Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 139

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 1653786)

1.

Evaluation of the Baxter-MicroScan 4-hour enzyme-based yeast identification system.

Land GA, Salkin IF, el-Zaatari M, McGinnis MR, Hashem G.

J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Apr;29(4):718-22.

2.

Clinical comparison of the Baxter MicroScan Yeast Identification Panel and the Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card.

Riddle DL, Giger O, Miller L, Hall GS, Woods GL.

Am J Clin Pathol. 1994 Apr;101(4):438-42.

PMID:
8160633
3.

Evaluation of Abbott Quantum II yeast identification system.

Salkin IF, Schadow KH, Bankaitis LA, McGinnis MR, Kemna ME.

J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Sep;22(3):442-4.

4.

Evaluation of the updated Vitek yeast identification data base.

el-Zaatari M, Pasarell L, McGinnis MR, Buckner J, Land GA, Salkin IF.

J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Sep;28(9):1938-41.

5.

Comparison of updated Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card and API 20C yeast identification systems.

Fenn JP, Segal H, Barland B, Denton D, Whisenant J, Chun H, Christofferson K, Hamilton L, Carroll K.

J Clin Microbiol. 1994 May;32(5):1184-7.

6.

Evaluation of the new API 20C strip for yeast identification against a conventional method.

Land GA, Harrison BA, Hulme KL, Cooper BH, Byrd JC.

J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Sep;10(3):357-64.

7.

Evaluation of the MicroScan Rapid Yeast Identification panel.

St Germain G, Beauchesne D.

J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Oct;29(10):2296-9.

8.

Comparison of RapID yeast plus system with API 20C system for identification of common, new, and emerging yeast pathogens.

Espinel-Ingroff A, Stockman L, Roberts G, Pincus D, Pollack J, Marler J.

J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Apr;36(4):883-6.

9.
10.

Rapid identification of yeasts by semi-automated and conventional methods.

Qadri SM, Flournoy DJ, Qadri SG, Ramirez EG.

Med Microbiol Immunol. 1986;175(5):307-16.

PMID:
3762492
11.

Misidentification of clinical yeast isolates by using the updated Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card.

Dooley DP, Beckius ML, Jeffrey BS.

J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Dec;32(12):2889-92.

12.

Evaluation of the new Micronaut-Candida system compared to the API ID32C method for yeast identification.

Szabó Z, Tóth B, Kovács M, Kardos G, Maráz A, Rozgonyi F, Majoros L.

J Clin Microbiol. 2008 May;46(5):1824-5. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02350-07. Epub 2008 Mar 5.

14.

Comparative study of seven commercial yeast identification systems.

Verweij PE, Breuker IM, Rijs AJ, Meis JF.

J Clin Pathol. 1999 Apr;52(4):271-3.

15.

Identification of clinical yeast isolates by using the Microring YT.

McGowan KL, Mortensen JE.

J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Feb;31(2):185-7.

16.

Update and evaluation of the AutoMicrobic yeast identification system.

Land G, Stotler R, Land K, Staneck J.

J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Oct;20(4):649-52.

17.
18.

Evaluation of the Pro-Lab ID ring system for the identification of medically important yeasts.

Sekhon AS, Padhye AA, Garg AK, Rae R.

Mycopathologia. 1992 Jul;119(1):11-6.

PMID:
1406902
19.

Comparison of three commercial systems for identification of yeasts commonly isolated in the clinical microbiology laboratory.

Wadlin JK, Hanko G, Stewart R, Pape J, Nachamkin I.

J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Jun;37(6):1967-70.

20.

Conventional and rapid methods for yeast identification.

Lin CC, Fung DY.

Crit Rev Microbiol. 1987;14(4):273-89. Review.

PMID:
3308316
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk