Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 95

1.

A scale for rating the quality of psychological trials for pain.

Yates SL, Morley S, Eccleston C, de C Williams AC.

Pain. 2005 Oct;117(3):314-25.

PMID:
16154704
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

Rating the methodological quality of single-subject designs and n-of-1 trials: introducing the Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED) Scale.

Tate RL, McDonald S, Perdices M, Togher L, Schultz R, Savage S.

Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2008 Aug;18(4):385-401. doi: 10.1080/09602010802009201.

PMID:
18576270
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials.

Maher CG, Sherrington C, Herbert RD, Moseley AM, Elkins M.

Phys Ther. 2003 Aug;83(8):713-21.

PMID:
12882612
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
4.

A new scale for assessing the quality of randomized clinical trials of psychotherapy.

Kocsis JH, Gerber AJ, Milrod B, Roose SP, Barber J, Thase ME, Perkins P, Leon AC.

Compr Psychiatry. 2010 May-Jun;51(3):319-24. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2009.07.001. Epub 2009 Aug 28.

PMID:
20399343
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

Assessing the quality of randomized trials: reliability of the Jadad scale.

Clark HD, Wells GA, Huët C, McAlister FA, Salmi LR, Fergusson D, Laupacis A.

Control Clin Trials. 1999 Oct;20(5):448-52.

PMID:
10503804
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

Reliability of Chalmers' scale to assess quality in meta-analyses on pharmacological treatments for osteoporosis.

Bérard A, Andreu N, Tétrault J, Niyonsenga T, Myhal D.

Ann Epidemiol. 2000 Nov;10(8):498-503.

PMID:
11118928
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Appraising the quality of randomized controlled trials: inter-rater reliability for the OTseeker evidence database.

Tooth L, Bennett S, McCluskey A, Hoffmann T, McKenna K, Lovarini M.

J Eval Clin Pract. 2005 Dec;11(6):547-55.

PMID:
16364108
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

A scale for distinguishing efficacy from effectiveness was adapted and applied to stroke rehabilitation studies.

Zettler LL, Speechley MR, Foley NC, Salter KL, Teasell RW.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Jan;63(1):11-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.007. Epub 2009 Sep 8. Review.

PMID:
19740623
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

A checklist to evaluate a report of a nonpharmacological trial (CLEAR NPT) was developed using consensus.

Boutron I, Moher D, Tugwell P, Giraudeau B, Poiraudeau S, Nizard R, Ravaud P.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Dec;58(12):1233-40. Epub 2005 Oct 13.

PMID:
16291467
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.
11.

Assessing the reporting and scientific quality of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of treatments for anxiety disorders.

Bereza BG, Machado M, Einarson TR.

Ann Pharmacother. 2008 Oct;42(10):1402-9. doi: 10.1345/aph.1L204. Epub 2008 Sep 2.

PMID:
18728102
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Development of a tool to rate the quality assessment of randomized controlled trials using a Delphi technique.

Sindhu F, Carpenter L, Seers K.

J Adv Nurs. 1997 Jun;25(6):1262-8.

PMID:
9181425
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?

Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, McQuay HJ.

Control Clin Trials. 1996 Feb;17(1):1-12.

PMID:
8721797
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Inter-rater and test-retest reliability of quality assessments by novice student raters using the Jadad and Newcastle-Ottawa Scales.

Oremus M, Oremus C, Hall GB, McKinnon MC; ECT & Cognition Systematic Review Team.

BMJ Open. 2012 Jul 31;2(4). pii: e001368. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001368. Print 2012.

PMID:
22855629
[PubMed]
Free Article
15.
16.

Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses.

Moher D, Cook DJ, Jadad AR, Tugwell P, Moher M, Jones A, Pham B, Klassen TP.

Health Technol Assess. 1999;3(12):i-iv, 1-98. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
10374081
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
17.

Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials?

Poolman RW, Struijs PA, Krips R, Sierevelt IN, Lutz KH, Bhandari M.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Sep 11;6:44.

PMID:
16965628
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
18.

Methods and processes of the CONSORT Group: example of an extension for trials assessing nonpharmacologic treatments.

Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, Schulz KF, Ravaud P; CONSORT Group.

Ann Intern Med. 2008 Feb 19;148(4):W60-6.

PMID:
18283201
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

The Delphi list: a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus.

Verhagen AP, de Vet HC, de Bie RA, Kessels AG, Boers M, Bouter LM, Knipschild PG.

J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Dec;51(12):1235-41.

PMID:
10086815
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Interrater reliability in clinical trials of depressive disorders.

Mulsant BH, Kastango KB, Rosen J, Stone RA, Mazumdar S, Pollock BG.

Am J Psychiatry. 2002 Sep;159(9):1598-600. Review.

PMID:
12202285
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk