Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 223

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 16110885)

1.

Public perceptions of transgenic animals.

Einsiedel EF.

Rev Sci Tech. 2005 Apr;24(1):149-57. Review.

PMID:
16110885
2.

Transgenic and cloned animals in the food chain - are we prepared to tackle it?

Jagadeesan P, Salem SB.

J Sci Food Agric. 2015 Apr 10. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.7205. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
25857482
3.

Genetically engineered livestock: ethical use for food and medical models.

Garas LC, Murray JD, Maga EA.

Annu Rev Anim Biosci. 2015;3:559-75. doi: 10.1146/annurev-animal-022114-110739. Epub 2014 Sep 3.

PMID:
25387117
4.

Attitudes to genetically modified food over time: How trust in organizations and the media cycle predict support.

Marques MD, Critchley CR, Walshe J.

Public Underst Sci. 2015 Jul;24(5):601-18. doi: 10.1177/0963662514542372. Epub 2014 Jul 24.

PMID:
25063421
5.

Animal Biotechnology: Science-Based Concerns.

National Research Council (US) Committee on Defining Science-Based Concerns Associated with Products of Animal Biotechnology.

Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2002.

6.

Explaining end-users' intentions to use innovative medical and food biotechnology products.

Mulder BC, Poortvliet PM, Lugtig P, de Bruin M.

Biotechnol J. 2014 Aug;9(8):997-9. doi: 10.1002/biot.201400224. Epub 2014 Jun 12.

PMID:
24919762
8.

Determinants of public attitudes to genetically modified salmon.

Amin L, Azad MA, Gausmian MH, Zulkifli F.

PLoS One. 2014 Jan 29;9(1):e86174. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086174. eCollection 2014.

9.

Stakeholders' attitude to genetically modified foods and medicine.

Amin L, Jahi JM, Nor AR.

ScientificWorldJournal. 2013 Dec 5;2013:516742. doi: 10.1155/2013/516742. eCollection 2013.

10.

Benefits and risks associated with genetically modified food products.

Kramkowska M, Grzelak T, Czyżewska K.

Ann Agric Environ Med. 2013;20(3):413-9. Review.

11.

Plant biotechnology: Tarnished promise.

[No authors listed]

Nature. 2013 May 2;497(7447):21. doi: 10.1038/497021a. No abstract available.

PMID:
23636376
12.
13.
14.

Genetically modified animals from life-science, socio-economic and ethical perspectives: examining issues in an EU policy context.

Frewer LJ, Kleter GA, Brennan M, Coles D, Fischer AR, Houdebine LM, Mora C, Millar K, Salter B.

N Biotechnol. 2013 Jun 25;30(5):447-60. doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2013.03.010. Epub 2013 Apr 6. Review.

PMID:
23567982
15.

Poison postures.

[No authors listed]

Nature. 2012 Sep 27;489(7417):474. No abstract available.

PMID:
23025010
16.

Nanotechnology: Armed resistance.

Phillips L.

Nature. 2012 Aug 30;488(7413):576-9. doi: 10.1038/488576a. No abstract available. Erratum in: Nature. 2012 Sep 6;489(7414):21.

PMID:
22932361
17.

[Biosafety assessment of genetically engineered animals: a review].

Xu J, Li N.

Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao. 2012 Mar;28(3):267-81. Review. Chinese.

PMID:
22712386
18.

Factors influencing Malaysian public attitudes to agro-biotechnology.

Amin L, Ahmad J, Jahi JM, Nor AR, Osman M, Mahadi NM.

Public Underst Sci. 2011 Sep;20(5):674-89.

PMID:
22164706
19.

[Challenges for a new health pact: biotechnology and risk].

Ianni AM.

Cien Saude Colet. 2011;16 Suppl 1:837-46. Portuguese.

20.

Public attitudes and beliefs about genetics.

Condit CM.

Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2010;11:339-59. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-082509-141740. Review.

PMID:
20690816
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk