Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 153

1.

Two new directions in speech processor design for cochlear implants.

Wilson BS, Schatzer R, Lopez-Poveda EA, Sun X, Lawson DT, Wolford RD.

Ear Hear. 2005 Aug;26(4 Suppl):73S-81S. Review.

PMID:
16082269
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

From electric acoustic stimulation to improved sound coding in cochlear implants.

Nopp P, Polak M.

Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;67:88-95. doi: 10.1159/000262600. Epub 2009 Nov 25. Review.

PMID:
19955725
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

New hardware for analog and combined analog and pulsatile sound-encoding strategies.

Hochmair-Desoyer IJ, Zierhofer C, Hochmair ES.

Prog Brain Res. 1993;97:291-300.

PMID:
8234755
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

Acceptance and fitting of the DUET device - a combined speech processor for electric acoustic stimulation.

Helbig S, Baumann U.

Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;67:81-7. doi: 10.1159/000262599. Epub 2009 Nov 25.

PMID:
19955724
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

Using genetic algorithms with subjective input from human subjects: implications for fitting hearing aids and cochlear implants.

Başkent D, Eiler CL, Edwards B.

Ear Hear. 2007 Jun;28(3):370-80.

PMID:
17485986
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

The influence of different speech processor and hearing aid settings on speech perception outcomes in electric acoustic stimulation patients.

Vermeire K, Anderson I, Flynn M, Van de Heyning P.

Ear Hear. 2008 Jan;29(1):76-86.

PMID:
18091097
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Cochlear implants: some likely next steps.

Wilson BS, Lawson DT, Muller JM, Tyler RS, Kiefer J.

Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2003;5:207-49. Epub 2003 Apr 16. Review.

PMID:
12704085
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Speech perception with mono- and quadrupolar electrode configurations: a crossover study.

Mens LH, Berenstein CK.

Otol Neurotol. 2005 Sep;26(5):957-64.

PMID:
16151343
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Design and evaluation of a continuous interleaved sampling (CIS) processing strategy for multichannel cochlear implants.

Wilson BS, Finley CC, Lawson DT, Wolford RD, Zerbi M.

J Rehabil Res Dev. 1993;30(1):110-6.

PMID:
8263821
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Clinical evaluation of higher stimulation rates in the nucleus research platform 8 system.

Plant K, Holden L, Skinner M, Arcaroli J, Whitford L, Law MA, Nel E.

Ear Hear. 2007 Jun;28(3):381-93.

PMID:
17485987
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Analysis of programming maps and its application for balancing multichannel cochlear implants.

Sainz M, de la Torre A, Roldán C, Ruiz JM, Vargas JL.

Int J Audiol. 2003 Jan;42(1):43-51.

PMID:
12564515
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

A new combined speech processor for electric and acoustic stimulation--eight months experience.

Helbig S, Baumann U, Helbig M, von Malsen-Waldkirch N, Gstoettner W.

ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2008;70(6):359-65. doi: 10.1159/000163031. Epub 2008 Nov 4.

PMID:
18984971
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.

Davidson LS.

Ear Hear. 2006 Oct;27(5):493-507.

PMID:
16957500
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

Cochlear implant speech processor placement and compression effects on sound sensitivity and interaural level difference.

Ricketts T, Grantham DW, D'Haese P, Edwards J, Barco A.

J Am Acad Audiol. 2006 Feb;17(2):133-40.

PMID:
16640065
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Better fitting of cochlear implants: modeling loudness for acoustic and electric stimuli.

McDermott H, Varsavsky A.

J Neural Eng. 2009 Dec;6(6):065007. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/6/6/065007. Epub 2009 Oct 23.

PMID:
19850972
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Neuroprosthetic hearing with auditory brainstem implants.

Kuchta J.

Biomed Tech (Berl). 2004 Apr;49(4):83-7.

PMID:
15171587
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Electric acoustic stimulation: a new era in prosthetic hearing rehabilitation.

Van de Heyning P, Punte AK.

Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;67:1-5. doi: 10.1159/000262591. Epub 2009 Nov 25. Review.

PMID:
19955716
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

Speech processing in vocoder-centric cochlear implants.

Loizou PC.

Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;64:109-43. Review.

PMID:
16891839
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.

Mok M, Grayden D, Dowell RC, Lawrence D.

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006 Apr;49(2):338-51.

PMID:
16671848
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk