Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 376

1.

Oral misoprostol vs. vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.

Adam I, Hassan OA, Elhassan EM.

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005 May;89(2):142-3. No abstract available.

PMID:
15847879
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

Cervical ripening and induction of labor with intravaginal misoprostol and Foley catheter cervical traction.

Kashanian M, Akbarian AR, Fekrat M.

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006 Jan;92(1):79-80. Epub 2005 Oct 21. No abstract available.

PMID:
16246342
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

A randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy of different doses of intravaginal misoprostol with intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.

Saxena P, Puri M, Bajaj M, Mishra A, Trivedi SS.

Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2011 Jul;15(7):759-63.

PMID:
21780543
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

A randomized clinical trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus cervical Foley plus oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.

Hill JB, Thigpen BD, Bofill JA, Magann E, Moore LE, Martin JN Jr.

Am J Perinatol. 2009 Jan;26(1):33-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1091396. Epub 2008 Oct 10.

PMID:
18850516
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

Vaginal misoprostol administration for cervical ripening and labor induction.

Wing DA, Gaffaney CA.

Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Sep;49(3):627-41. Review.

PMID:
16885668
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

A prospective randomized study comparing misoprostol and oxytocin for premature rupture of membranes at term.

Zeteroğlu S, Engin-Ustün Y, Ustün Y, Güvercinçi M, Sahin G, Kamaci M.

J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2006 May;19(5):283-7.

PMID:
16753768
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.

Adeniji OA, Oladokun A, Olayemi O, Adeniji OI, Odukogbe AA, Ogunbode O, Aimakhu CO, Omigbodun AO, Ilesanmi AO.

J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005 Feb;25(2):134-9.

PMID:
15814391
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Low dose intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical baloon catheter for pre-induction cervical ripening.

Tabowei TO, Oboro VO.

East Afr Med J. 2003 Feb;80(2):91-4.

PMID:
16167722
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial.

Paungmora N, Herabutya Y, O-Prasertsawat P, Punyavachira P.

J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2004 Oct;30(5):358-62.

PMID:
15327448
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Effectiveness and safety of a new vaginal misoprostol product specifically labeled for cervical ripening and labor induction.

Cecatti JG, Tedesco RP, Pires HM, Calderon IM, Faúndes A.

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(6):706-11.

PMID:
16752263
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Preinduction cervical ripening. A randomized trial of intravaginal misoprostol alone vs. a combination of transcervical Foley balloon and intravaginal misoprostol.

Rust OA, Greybush M, Atlas RO, Jones KJ, Balducci J.

J Reprod Med. 2001 Oct;46(10):899-904.

PMID:
11725734
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Comparison of 25 and 50 microg vaginally administered misoprostol for preinduction of cervical ripening and labor induction.

Has R, Batukan C, Ermis H, Cevher E, Araman A, Kiliç G, Ibrahimoğlu L.

Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2002;53(1):16-21.

PMID:
11803223
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: misoprostol vs oxytocin.

Fonseca L, Wood HC, Lucas MJ, Ramin SM, Phatak D, Gilstrap LC 3rd, Yeomans ER.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Sep;199(3):305.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.07.014.

PMID:
18771993
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Misoprostol vaginal insert for successful labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.

Wing DA, Miller H, Parker L, Powers BL, Rayburn WF; Misoprostol Vaginal Insert Miso-Obs-204 Investigators.

Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Mar;117(3):533-41. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318209d669.

PMID:
21343755
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

Factors affecting the likelihood of successful induction after intravaginal misoprostol application for cervical ripening and labor induction.

Wing DA, Tran S, Paul RH.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jun;186(6):1237-40; discussion 1240-3.

PMID:
12066104
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Intravaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter for cervical ripening and induction of labor.

Afolabi BB, Oyeneyin OL, Ogedengbe OK.

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005 Jun;89(3):263-7. Epub 2005 Apr 2.

PMID:
15919393
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

[Comparative study of the effect of intravaginal misoprostol at 50 and 100 micrograms in cervical ripening and labor induction].

Reyna-Villasmil E, Guerra-Velásquez M, Torres-Montilla M, Reyna-Villasmil N, Mejia-Montilla J, Labarca-Vincero N.

Invest Clin. 2005 Jun;46(2):179-86. Spanish.

PMID:
16001749
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Induction of labor in prolonged pregnancy with unfavorable cervix: comparison of sequential intracervical Foley catheter-intravaginal misoprostol and intravaginal misoprostol alone.

Ande AB, Ezeanochie CM, Olagbuji NB.

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Apr;285(4):967-71. doi: 10.1007/s00404-011-2094-4. Epub 2011 Oct 20.

PMID:
22012248
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

Labor induction with 25 microg versus 50 microg intravaginal misoprostol: a systematic review.

Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM, Delke I.

Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jan;99(1):145-51. Review.

PMID:
11777525
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Comparison of changes in pre-induction cervical factors' scores following ripening with transcervical foley catheter and intravaginal misoprostol.

Adeniji AO, Olayemi O, Odukogbe AA, Aimakhu CO, Oladokun A, Akindele FO, Adeniji OI, Omigbodun AO, Ilesanmi AO.

Afr J Med Med Sci. 2005 Dec;34(4):377-82.

PMID:
16752669
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk