Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 1196

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 15611647)

1.

Comparative genomics, evolution and origins of the nuclear envelope and nuclear pore complex.

Mans BJ, Anantharaman V, Aravind L, Koonin EV.

Cell Cycle. 2004 Dec;3(12):1612-37. Epub 2004 Dec 20.

2.

Evolutionary genomics of nucleo-cytoplasmic large DNA viruses.

Iyer LM, Balaji S, Koonin EV, Aravind L.

Virus Res. 2006 Apr;117(1):156-84. Epub 2006 Feb 21. Review.

PMID:
16494962
3.

The C-terminal domain of TAP interacts with the nuclear pore complex and promotes export of specific CTE-bearing RNA substrates.

Bachi A, Braun IC, Rodrigues JP, Panté N, Ribbeck K, von Kobbe C, Kutay U, Wilm M, Görlich D, Carmo-Fonseca M, Izaurralde E.

RNA. 2000 Jan;6(1):136-58.

4.

Glimpsing over the event horizon: evolution of nuclear pores and envelope.

Jékely G.

Cell Cycle. 2005 Feb;4(2):297-9. Epub 2005 Feb 6.

5.

Structural analysis of the nuclear pore complex by integrated approaches.

Elad N, Maimon T, Frenkiel-Krispin D, Lim RY, Medalia O.

Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2009 Apr;19(2):226-32. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2009.02.009. Epub 2009 Mar 25. Review.

PMID:
19327984
6.

The human homologue of yeast CRM1 is in a dynamic subcomplex with CAN/Nup214 and a novel nuclear pore component Nup88.

Fornerod M, van Deursen J, van Baal S, Reynolds A, Davis D, Murti KG, Fransen J, Grosveld G.

EMBO J. 1997 Feb 17;16(4):807-16.

8.

The yeast nucleoporin Nup188p interacts genetically and physically with the core structures of the nuclear pore complex.

Nehrbass U, Rout MP, Maguire S, Blobel G, Wozniak RW.

J Cell Biol. 1996 Jun;133(6):1153-62.

9.

Structural and functional analysis of Nup133 domains reveals modular building blocks of the nuclear pore complex.

Berke IC, Boehmer T, Blobel G, Schwartz TU.

J Cell Biol. 2004 Nov 22;167(4):591-7.

10.

Evidence for a shared nuclear pore complex architecture that is conserved from the last common eukaryotic ancestor.

DeGrasse JA, DuBois KN, Devos D, Siegel TN, Sali A, Field MC, Rout MP, Chait BT.

Mol Cell Proteomics. 2009 Sep;8(9):2119-30. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M900038-MCP200. Epub 2009 Jun 13.

11.
12.

Three-dimensional organization of chromatids by nuclear envelope-associated structures.

Blobel G.

Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2010;75:545-54. doi: 10.1101/sqb.2010.75.004. Epub 2010 Nov 3. Review.

PMID:
21047906
13.

Long unfolded linkers facilitate membrane protein import through the nuclear pore complex.

Meinema AC, Laba JK, Hapsari RA, Otten R, Mulder FA, Kralt A, van den Bogaart G, Lusk CP, Poolman B, Veenhoff LM.

Science. 2011 Jul 1;333(6038):90-3. doi: 10.1126/science.1205741. Epub 2011 Jun 9.

14.

Molecular dissection of the nuclear pore complex.

Panté N, Aebi U.

Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 1996 Apr;31(2):153-99. Review.

PMID:
8740526
15.

Nuclear mRNA export requires specific FG nucleoporins for translocation through the nuclear pore complex.

Terry LJ, Wente SR.

J Cell Biol. 2007 Sep 24;178(7):1121-32. Epub 2007 Sep 17.

16.
17.

Mediators of nuclear protein import target karyophilic proteins to pore complexes of cytoplasmic annulate lamellae.

Cordes VC, Rackwitz HR, Reidenbach S.

Exp Cell Res. 1997 Dec 15;237(2):419-33.

PMID:
9434638
18.

Dbp5, a DEAD-box protein required for mRNA export, is recruited to the cytoplasmic fibrils of nuclear pore complex via a conserved interaction with CAN/Nup159p.

Schmitt C, von Kobbe C, Bachi A, Panté N, Rodrigues JP, Boscheron C, Rigaut G, Wilm M, Séraphin B, Carmo-Fonseca M, Izaurralde E.

EMBO J. 1999 Aug 2;18(15):4332-47.

20.

Computational and biochemical identification of a nuclear pore complex binding site on the nuclear transport carrier NTF2.

Cushman I, Bowman BR, Sowa ME, Lichtarge O, Quiocho FA, Moore MS.

J Mol Biol. 2004 Nov 19;344(2):303-10.

PMID:
15522285
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk