Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 85

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 15140947)

1.

An assessment of accuracy, error, and conflict with support values from genome-scale phylogenetic data.

Taylor DJ, Piel WH.

Mol Biol Evol. 2004 Aug;21(8):1534-7. Epub 2004 May 12. Erratum in: Mol Biol Evol. 2004 Sep;21(9):1812.

2.

Comparing bootstrap and posterior probability values in the four-taxon case.

Cummings MP, Handley SA, Myers DS, Reed DL, Rokas A, Winka K.

Syst Biol. 2003 Aug;52(4):477-87.

PMID:
12857639
3.
4.

Reliability of Bayesian posterior probabilities and bootstrap frequencies in phylogenetics.

Erixon P, Svennblad B, Britton T, Oxelman B.

Syst Biol. 2003 Oct;52(5):665-73.

PMID:
14530133
5.
6.

Effects of branch length uncertainty on Bayesian posterior probabilities for phylogenetic hypotheses.

Kolaczkowski B, Thornton JW.

Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Sep;24(9):2108-18. Epub 2007 Jul 17.

8.

How meaningful are Bayesian support values?

Simmons MP, Pickett KM, Miya M.

Mol Biol Evol. 2004 Jan;21(1):188-99. Epub 2003 Oct 31.

9.

Comparison of Bayesian and maximum likelihood bootstrap measures of phylogenetic reliability.

Douady CJ, Delsuc F, Boucher Y, Doolittle WF, Douzery EJ.

Mol Biol Evol. 2003 Feb;20(2):248-54.

10.

The impact of outgroup choice and missing data on major seed plant phylogenetics using genome-wide EST data.

de la Torre-Bárcena JE, Kolokotronis SO, Lee EK, Stevenson DW, Brenner ED, Katari MS, Coruzzi GM, DeSalle R.

PLoS One. 2009 Jun 2;4(6):e5764. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005764.

11.

Branch-length prior influences Bayesian posterior probability of phylogeny.

Yang Z, Rannala B.

Syst Biol. 2005 Jun;54(3):455-70.

PMID:
16012111
12.

Bayesian support is larger than bootstrap support in phylogenetic inference: a mathematical argument.

Britton T, Svennblad B, Erixon P, Oxelman B.

Math Med Biol. 2007 Dec;24(4):401-11. Epub 2007 Oct 31.

PMID:
17977880
13.

Is there a star tree paradox?

Kolaczkowski B, Thornton JW.

Mol Biol Evol. 2006 Oct;23(10):1819-23. Epub 2006 Jul 12.

14.

Overcredibility of molecular phylogenies obtained by Bayesian phylogenetics.

Suzuki Y, Glazko GV, Nei M.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Dec 10;99(25):16138-43. Epub 2002 Nov 25.

15.

Genome-scale phylogeny and the detection of systematic biases.

Phillips MJ, Delsuc F, Penny D.

Mol Biol Evol. 2004 Jul;21(7):1455-8. Epub 2004 Apr 14.

16.

The importance of proper model assumption in bayesian phylogenetics.

Lemmon AR, Moriarty EC.

Syst Biol. 2004 Apr;53(2):265-77.

PMID:
15205052
17.

Supertree bootstrapping methods for assessing phylogenetic variation among genes in genome-scale data sets.

Burleigh JG, Driskell AC, Sanderson MJ.

Syst Biol. 2006 Jun;55(3):426-40.

PMID:
16861207
19.
20.

Tree disagreement: measuring and testing incongruence in phylogenies.

Planet PJ.

J Biomed Inform. 2006 Feb;39(1):86-102. Epub 2005 Sep 28. Review.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk