Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 204

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 15130011)

1.

Phase plate to extend the depth of field of incoherent hybrid imaging systems.

Sherif SS, Cathey WT, Dowski ER.

Appl Opt. 2004 May 1;43(13):2709-21.

PMID:
15130011
2.

Reduced depth of field in incoherent hybrid imaging systems.

Sherif SS, Cathey WT.

Appl Opt. 2002 Oct 10;41(29):6062-74.

PMID:
12389975
3.

Optimized sinusoidal phase mask to extend the depth of field of an incoherent imaging system.

Zhao H, Li Y.

Opt Lett. 2010 Jan 15;35(2):267-9. doi: 10.1364/OL.35.000267.

PMID:
20081991
4.

Improved sinusoidal phase plate to extend depth of field in incoherent hybrid imaging systems.

Wang J, Bu J, Wang M, Yang Y, Yuan XC.

Opt Lett. 2012 Nov 1;37(21):4534-6. doi: 10.1364/OL.37.004534.

PMID:
23114354
5.

Effect of detector noise in incoherent hybrid imaging systems.

Sherif SS, Dowski ER, Cathey WT.

Opt Lett. 2005 Oct 1;30(19):2566-8.

PMID:
16208901
6.

Rational phase mask to extend the depth of field in optical-digital hybrid imaging systems.

Zhou F, Li G, Zhang H, Wang D.

Opt Lett. 2009 Feb 1;34(3):380-2.

PMID:
19183665
7.
8.

An optimal binary amplitude-phase mask for hybrid imaging systems that exhibit high resolution and extended depth of field.

Ben-Eliezer E, Konforti N, Milgrom B, Marom E.

Opt Express. 2008 Dec 8;16(25):20540-61.

PMID:
19065193
9.

Optimized asymmetrical tangent phase mask to obtain defocus invariant modulation transfer function in incoherent imaging systems.

Le VN, Chen S, Fan Z.

Opt Lett. 2014 Apr 1;39(7):2171-4. doi: 10.1364/OL.39.002171.

PMID:
24686703
10.

Quality parameters analysis of optical imaging systems with enhanced focal depth using the Wigner distribution function

Zalvidea D, Colautti C, Sicre EE.

J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2000 May;17(5):867-73.

PMID:
10795634
11.

Increase in depth of field taking into account deconvolution by optimization of pupil mask.

Diaz F, Goudail F, Loiseaux B, Huignard JP.

Opt Lett. 2009 Oct 1;34(19):2970-2. doi: 10.1364/OL.34.002970.

PMID:
19794785
12.

Comparison of depth-of-focus-enhancing pupil masks based on a signal-to-noise-ratio criterion after deconvolution.

Diaz F, Goudail F, Loiseaux B, Huignard JP.

J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2010 Oct 1;27(10):2123-31. doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.27.002123.

PMID:
20922002
13.

Optical/digital incoherent image processing for extended depth of field.

Poon TC, Motamedi M.

Appl Opt. 1987 Nov 1;26(21):4612-5. doi: 10.1364/AO.26.004612.

PMID:
20523413
14.

Extending the depth of field through unbalanced optical path difference.

Chu K, George N, Chi W.

Appl Opt. 2008 Dec 20;47(36):6895-903.

PMID:
19104543
15.

Realizations of focus invariance in optical-digital systems with wave-front coding.

Bradburn S, Cathey WT, Dowski ER.

Appl Opt. 1997 Dec 10;36(35):9157-66.

PMID:
18264474
16.

Extension of depth of field using amplitude and phase modulation of the pupil function.

Bagheri S, Javidi B.

Opt Lett. 2008 Apr 1;33(7):757-9.

PMID:
18382542
17.

Analysis of optical systems with extended depth of field using the Wigner distribution function.

Yang Q, Liu L, Sun J, Zhu Y, Lu W.

Appl Opt. 2006 Dec 1;45(34):8586-95.

PMID:
17119553
18.

Incoherently combining logarithmic aspheric lenses for extended depth of field.

Chu K, George N, Chi W.

Appl Opt. 2009 Oct 1;48(28):5371-9. doi: 10.1364/AO.48.005371.

PMID:
19798377
19.

Extended depth of field through wave-front coding.

Dowski ER Jr, Cathey WT.

Appl Opt. 1995 Apr 10;34(11):1859-66. doi: 10.1364/AO.34.001859.

PMID:
21037731
20.

Phase pupil functions for reduction of defocus and spherical aberrations.

Mezouari S, Harvey AR.

Opt Lett. 2003 May 15;28(10):771-3.

PMID:
12779141
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk