Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 81

1.

The third United States-Japan meeting on the Toxicological Characterization of Environmental Chemicals.

Kurokawa Y, Damstra T.

Environ Health Perspect. 1992 Nov;98:281-6.

PMID:
1486859
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
2.

U.S.-Japan joint meeting on the toxicological characterization of environmental chemicals of mutual interest.

Damstra T, Kurokawa Y.

Environ Health Perspect. 1990 Jul;87:301-7.

PMID:
2269235
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
3.

The fourth United States-Japan meeting on the toxicological characterization of environmental chemicals.

Damstra T, Kurokawa Y.

Environ Health Perspect. 1993 Dec;101(7):644-9. No abstract available.

PMID:
8143598
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
4.
5.

A perspective on current and future uses of alternative models for carcinogenicity testing.

Goodman JI.

Toxicol Pathol. 2001;29 Suppl:173-6. Review.

PMID:
11695554
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
6.

Comparative results of 327 chemical carcinogenicity studies.

Haseman JK, Huff JE, Zeiger E, McConnell EE.

Environ Health Perspect. 1987 Oct;74:229-35.

PMID:
3691430
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
7.

Evaluation of reduced protocols for carcinogenicity testing of chemicals: report of a joint EPA/NIEHS workshop.

Lai DY, Baetcke KP, Vu VT, Cotruvo JA, Eustis SL.

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1994 Apr;19(2):183-201. Review.

PMID:
8041916
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Animal carcinogenicity studies: 2. Obstacles to extrapolation of data to humans.

Knight A, Bailey J, Balcombe J.

Altern Lab Anim. 2006 Feb;34(1):29-38.

PMID:
16522148
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
9.

Animal carcinogenicity studies: 1. Poor human predictivity.

Knight A, Bailey J, Balcombe J.

Altern Lab Anim. 2006 Feb;34(1):19-27.

PMID:
16522147
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
10.
11.
12.

The "rodent carcinogen" dilemma: formidable challenge for the technologies of the new millennium.

Johnson FM.

Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000;919:288-99. No abstract available.

PMID:
11083119
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Profiling the activity of environmental chemicals in prenatal developmental toxicity studies using the U.S. EPA's ToxRefDB.

Knudsen TB, Martin MT, Kavlock RJ, Judson RS, Dix DJ, Singh AV.

Reprod Toxicol. 2009 Sep;28(2):209-19. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2009.03.016. Epub 2009 Apr 10.

PMID:
19446433
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.
15.

Use of genetic toxicology data in U.S. EPA risk assessment: the mercury study report as an example.

Schoeny R.

Environ Health Perspect. 1996 May;104 Suppl 3:663-73.

PMID:
8781402
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
16.

Guidelines for developmental toxicity testing of chemicals in Japan.

Tanimura T.

Neurobehav Toxicol Teratol. 1985 Nov-Dec;7(6):647-52.

PMID:
3835459
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Excessive fear of PCBs.

Abelson PH.

Science. 1991 Jul 26;253(5018):361. No abstract available.

PMID:
1907400
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Chemicals causing mammary gland tumors in animals signal new directions for epidemiology, chemicals testing, and risk assessment for breast cancer prevention.

Rudel RA, Attfield KR, Schifano JN, Brody JG.

Cancer. 2007 Jun 15;109(12 Suppl):2635-66. Review.

PMID:
17503434
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
19.

Polychlorinated dibenzofurans.

[No authors listed]

IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 1997;69:345-423. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
9336730
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Will all chemicals be carcinogenic to rodents when adequately evaluated?

Ashby J, Purchase IF.

Mutagenesis. 1993 Nov;8(6):489-93. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
8133777
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk