Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 230

1.

The effect of computer-assisted evaluation of labor on cesarean rates.

Hamilton E, Platt R, Gauthier R, McNamara H, Miner L, Rothenberg S, Asselin G, Sabbah R, Benjamin A, Lake M, Vintzileos A.

J Healthc Qual. 2004 Jan-Feb;26(1):37-44.

PMID:
14763319
2.

Using the medical audit cycle to reduce cesarean section rates.

Robson MS, Scudamore IW, Walsh SM.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jan;174(1 Pt 1):199-205.

PMID:
8572006
3.
4.

Adherence to guidelines on the management of dystocia and cesarean section rates.

Oppenheimer LW, Holmes P, Yang Q, Yang T, Walker M, Wu Wen S.

Am J Perinatol. 2007 May;24(5):271-5. Epub 2007 May 4.

PMID:
17484079
5.

Physician incentives and the timing of cesarean sections: evidence from California.

Spetz J, Smith MW, Ennis SF.

Med Care. 2001 Jun;39(6):536-50.

PMID:
11404639
6.

The continuing effectiveness of active management of first labor, despite a doubling in overall nulliparous cesarean delivery.

Foley ME, Alarab M, Daly L, Keane D, Rath A, O'herlihy C.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Sep;191(3):891-5.

PMID:
15467560
8.

Temporal variation in rates of cesarean section for dystocia: does "convenience" play a role?

Fraser W, Usher RH, McLean FH, Bossenberry C, Thomson ME, Kramer MS, Smith LP, Power H.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Feb;156(2):300-4.

PMID:
3826164
9.

Study of the variations of the cesarean sections rate in the Rhône-Alpes region (France): effect of women and maternity service characteristics.

Rabilloud M, Ecochard R, Guilhot J, Toselli A, Mabriez JC, Matillon Y.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1998 May;78(1):11-7.

PMID:
9605442
10.

Cesarean section deliveries in Fiji, 1986 to 1996.

Saunders DL, Makutu SL.

Pac Health Dialog. 2001 Mar;8(1):71-7.

PMID:
12017841
11.

A prospective randomized study of the aggressive management of early labor.

Cohen GR, O'Brien WF, Lewis L, Knuppel RA.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Nov;157(5):1174-7.

PMID:
3688070
12.

Incidence and outcomes of dystocia in the active phase of labor in term nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset.

Kjaergaard H, Olsen J, Ottesen B, Dykes AK.

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(4):402-7. doi: 10.1080/00016340902811001.

PMID:
19330572
13.

The Jordanian cesarean section rate.

Hindawi IM, Meri ZB.

Saudi Med J. 2004 Nov;25(11):1631-5.

PMID:
15573191
14.

Effect of a clinical practice guideline on physician compliance.

Suwanrath-Kengpol C, Pinjaroen S, Krisanapan O, Petmanee P.

Int J Qual Health Care. 2004 Aug;16(4):327-32.

15.

The MFMU Cesarean Registry: impact of fetal size on trial of labor success for patients with previous cesarean for dystocia.

Peaceman AM, Gersnoviez R, Landon MB, Spong CY, Leveno KJ, Varner MW, Rouse DJ, Moawad AH, Caritis SN, Harper M, Wapner RJ, Sorokin Y, Miodovnik M, Carpenter M, O'Sullivan MJ, Sibai BM, Langer O, Thorp JM, Ramin SM, Mercer BM; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Oct;195(4):1127-31.

PMID:
17000245
16.
17.

A review of factors associated with dystocia and cesarean section in nulliparous women.

Lowe NK.

J Midwifery Womens Health. 2007 May-Jun;52(3):216-28. Review.

PMID:
17467588
18.

Evidence-based strategies for reducing cesarean section rates: a meta-analysis.

Chaillet N, Dumont A.

Birth. 2007 Mar;34(1):53-64. Review.

PMID:
17324180
19.

Do risk factors for elective cesarean section differ from those of cesarean section during labor in low risk pregnancies?

Roman H, Blondel B, Bréart G, Goffinet F.

J Perinat Med. 2008;36(4):297-305. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2008.044.

PMID:
18598118
20.

Practice environment is associated with obstetric decision making regarding abnormal labor.

Carpenter MW, Soule D, Yates WT, Meeker CI.

Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Oct;70(4):657-62.

PMID:
3627632
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk