Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 90

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 14757803)

2.

What quality improvement professionals need to know about IRBs.

Byers JF, Aragon ED.

J Healthc Qual. 2003 Jul-Aug;25(4):4-9; quiz 9, 56. Erratum in: J Healthc Qual. 2003 Nov-Dec;25(6):44.

PMID:
14606206
3.
4.

[The origin of informed consent].

Mallardi V.

Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27. Italian.

PMID:
16602332
5.

Ethical conduct recommendations for quality improvement projects.

Layer T.

J Healthc Qual. 2003 Jul-Aug;25(4):44-6.

PMID:
14606212
6.

Knowledge development, quality improvement, and research ethics.

Redman RW.

Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2007;21(4):217-9.

PMID:
18236767
8.

A survey of academic medical centers to distinguish between quality improvement and research activities.

Johnson N, Vermeulen L, Smith KM.

Qual Manag Health Care. 2006 Oct-Dec;15(4):215-20.

PMID:
17047495
9.

Quality improvement, research, and the institutional review board.

Harrington L.

J Healthc Qual. 2007 May-Jun;29(3):4-9.

PMID:
17708327
10.

Implementation of Releasing Time to Care - the productive ward.

Wilson G.

J Nurs Manag. 2009 Jul;17(5):647-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2009.01026.x.

PMID:
19575723
11.

Speaking the right language: the scientific method as a framework for a continuous quality improvement program within academic medical research compliance units.

Nolte KB, Stewart DM, O'Hair KC, Gannon WL, Briggs MS, Barron AM, Pointer J, Larson RS.

Acad Med. 2008 Oct;83(10):941-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181850b2a. Review.

PMID:
18820524
12.

Critical care checklists, the Keystone Project, and the Office for Human Research Protections: a case for streamlining the approval process in quality-improvement research.

Savel RH, Goldstein EB, Gropper MA.

Crit Care Med. 2009 Feb;37(2):725-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819541f8. Review.

PMID:
19114910
13.

Working with the institutional review board.

Byerly WG.

Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009 Jan 15;66(2):176-84. doi: 10.2146/ajhp070066. Review.

PMID:
19139484
14.

Quality improvement and the need for IRB review.

Nerenz DR, Stoltz PK, Jordan J.

Qual Manag Health Care. 2003 Jul-Sep;12(3):159-70.

PMID:
12891960
15.

Commentary: quality improvement projects: how do we protect patients' rights?

Diamond LH, Kliger AS, Goldman RS, Palevsky PM.

Am J Med Qual. 2004 Jan-Feb;19(1):25-7.

PMID:
14977022
16.

Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.

Bekkering GE, Kleijnen J.

Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.

PMID:
18987905
17.

Intensive care unit quality improvement: a "how-to" guide for the interdisciplinary team.

Curtis JR, Cook DJ, Wall RJ, Angus DC, Bion J, Kacmarek R, Kane-Gill SL, Kirchhoff KT, Levy M, Mitchell PH, Moreno R, Pronovost P, Puntillo K.

Crit Care Med. 2006 Jan;34(1):211-8. Review.

PMID:
16374176
18.

Conflicts of interest in research involving human beings.

Greco D, Diniz NM.

J Int Bioethique. 2008 Mar-Jun;19(1-2):143-54, 202-3. Review.

PMID:
18664007
19.

[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].

Bekkering GE, Kleijnen J.

Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25. German.

PMID:
19034813
20.

The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.

Buckley S, Coleman J, Davison I, Khan KS, Zamora J, Malick S, Morley D, Pollard D, Ashcroft T, Popovic C, Sayers J.

Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897. Review.

PMID:
19404891
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk