Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 125

1.

From the five blind men to Cochrane Complementary Medicine systematic reviews.

Ezzo J.

J Altern Complement Med. 2003 Dec;9(6):969-72. No abstract available.

PMID:
14736367
2.

Clinical research on acupuncture. Part 2. Controlled clinical trials, an overview of their methods.

Birch S.

J Altern Complement Med. 2004 Jun;10(3):481-98. Review.

PMID:
15253852
3.

Clinical research on acupuncture. Part 1. What have reviews of the efficacy and safety of acupuncture told us so far?

Birch S, Hesselink JK, Jonkman FA, Hekker TA, Bos A.

J Altern Complement Med. 2004 Jun;10(3):468-80. Review.

PMID:
15253851
4.

Complementary medicine and the Cochrane Collaboration.

Ezzo J, Berman BM, Vickers AJ, Linde K.

JAMA. 1998 Nov 11;280(18):1628-30. No abstract available.

PMID:
9820271
5.

Standards to improve the reporting of clinical trials in acupuncture.

Hopewell S.

Acupunct Med. 2010 Jun;28(2):63. doi: 10.1136/aim.2010.002311. No abstract available.

PMID:
20615857
6.

Heterogeneity in search strategies among Cochrane acupuncture reviews: is there room for improvement?

Lui S, Smith EJ, Terplan M.

Acupunct Med. 2010 Sep;28(3):149-53. doi: 10.1136/aim.2010.002444. Epub 2010 Jun 28.

PMID:
20615852
7.

Assessing the utility of the standards for reporting trials of acupuncture (STRICTA): a survey of authors.

Prady SL, Macpherson H.

J Altern Complement Med. 2007 Nov;13(9):939-43.

PMID:
18047440
8.

Systematic reviews and meta-analysis.

Haase SC.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Feb;127(2):955-66. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318200afa9.

PMID:
21285802
9.

Commentary on Sood et al.: "Cochrane systematic reviews in acupuncture: methodological diversity in database searching".

Lao L.

J Altern Complement Med. 2005 Aug;11(4):723-4. No abstract available.

PMID:
16131299
10.

The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration.

Turner L, Boutron I, Hróbjartsson A, Altman DG, Moher D.

Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 23;2:79. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-79. Review. No abstract available.

11.

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group.

Int J Surg. 2010;8(5):336-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007. Epub 2010 Feb 18. No abstract available. Erratum in: Int J Surg. 2010;8(8):658.

12.
13.

Bias in the trial and reporting of trials of homeopathy: a fundamental breakdown in peer review and standards?

Frass M, Schuster E, Muchitsch I, Duncan J, Gei W, Kozel G, Kastinger-Mayr C, Felleitner AE, Reiter C, Endler C, Oberbaum M.

J Altern Complement Med. 2005 Oct;11(5):780-2. No abstract available.

PMID:
16296904
14.

Testing a tool for the classification of study designs in systematic reviews of interventions and exposures showed moderate reliability and low accuracy.

Hartling L, Bond K, Santaguida PL, Viswanathan M, Dryden DM.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Aug;64(8):861-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.010. Epub 2011 Apr 30.

PMID:
21531537
15.

Whether industry-supported or otherwise, trust is key to the acceptance of all research.

Glick M.

J Am Dent Assoc. 2010 Feb;141(2):127-8. No abstract available.

PMID:
20123863
16.

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement and publication bias.

Knobloch K, Yoon U, Vogt PM.

J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2011 Mar;39(2):91-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2010.11.001. Epub 2010 Dec 9.

PMID:
21145753
17.

Quality of systematic reviews in pediatric oncology--a systematic review.

Lundh A, Knijnenburg SL, Jørgensen AW, van Dalen EC, Kremer LC.

Cancer Treat Rev. 2009 Dec;35(8):645-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2009.08.010. Review.

PMID:
19836897
18.

Acupuncture research--the first 10 years in Exeter.

Ernst E.

Acupunct Med. 2003 Sep;21(3):100-4.

19.

Overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of acupuncture for stroke.

Zhang JH, Wang D, Liu M.

Neuroepidemiology. 2014;42(1):50-8. doi: 10.1159/000355435. Epub 2013 Dec 12. Review.

20.

Standards for reporting interventions in controlled trials of acupuncture: The STRICTA recommendations. STandards for Reporting Interventions in Controlled Trails of Acupuncture.

MacPherson H, White A, Cummings M, Jobst K, Rose K, Niemtzow R; STandards for Reporting Interventions in Controlled Trails of Acupuncture.

Acupunct Med. 2002 Mar;20(1):22-5.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk