Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 220

1.
2.

An interrater reliability study of the assessment of pressure ulcer risk using the Braden scale and the classification of pressure ulcers in a home care setting.

Kottner J, Halfens R, Dassen T.

Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Oct;46(10):1307-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.03.014. Epub 2009 Apr 29.

PMID:
19406400
3.
4.

Inter- and intrarater reliability of the Waterlow pressure sore risk scale: a systematic review.

Kottner J, Dassen T, Tannen A.

Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Mar;46(3):369-79. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.09.010. Epub 2008 Nov 4. Review.

PMID:
18986650
5.

An interrater reliability study of the Braden scale in two nursing homes.

Kottner J, Dassen T.

Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 Oct;45(10):1501-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.02.007.

PMID:
18395726
6.

Predicting pressure ulcer risk with the modified Braden, Braden, and Norton scales in acute care hospitals in Mainland China.

Kwong E, Pang S, Wong T, Ho J, Shao-ling X, Li-jun T.

Appl Nurs Res. 2005 May;18(2):122-8.

PMID:
15991112
7.

EPUAP classification system for pressure ulcers: European reliability study.

Beeckman D, Schoonhoven L, Fletcher J, Furtado K, Gunningberg L, Heyman H, Lindholm C, Paquay L, VerdĂș J, Defloor T.

J Adv Nurs. 2007 Dec;60(6):682-91.

PMID:
18039255
8.

Accuracy and quality in the nursing documentation of pressure ulcers: a comparison of record content and patient examination.

Gunningberg L, Ehrenberg A.

J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2004 Nov-Dec;31(6):328-35.

PMID:
15867708
9.

How accurate are pressure ulcer grades? An image-based survey of nurse performance.

Russell LJ, Reynolds TM.

J Tissue Viability. 2001 Apr;11(2):67, 70-5.

PMID:
11949377
10.

A risk assessment scale for the prediction of pressure sore development: reliability and validity.

Lindgren M, Unosson M, Krantz AM, Ek AC.

J Adv Nurs. 2002 Apr;38(2):190-9.

PMID:
11940132
11.

Reliability of the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel classification system.

Defloor T, Schoonhoven L, Katrien V, Weststrate J, Myny D.

J Adv Nurs. 2006 Apr;54(2):189-98.

PMID:
16553705
12.

Pressure ulcer grading.

Moore Z.

Nurs Stand. 2005 Sep 7-13;19(52):56-64; quiz 66. Review.

PMID:
16163987
13.

Examining the validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales: a replication study.

Gould D, Goldstone L, Kelly D, Gammon J.

Int J Nurs Stud. 2004 Mar;41(3):331-9.

PMID:
14967190
14.

Inter-rater reliability of risk-assessment scales.

Watkinson C.

Prof Nurse. 1996 Aug;11(11):751-2, 755-6.

PMID:
8718321
15.

The reliability of two observation methods of nonblanchable erythema, Grade 1 pressure ulcer.

Vanderwee K, Grypdonck MH, De Bacquer D, Defloor T.

Appl Nurs Res. 2006 Aug;19(3):156-62.

PMID:
16877195
16.

Skin breakdown in acute care pediatrics.

Suddaby EC, Barnett S, Facteau L.

Pediatr Nurs. 2005 Mar-Apr;31(2):132-8, 148.

PMID:
15934568
17.
18.

The PUSH tool: a survey to determine its perceived usefulness.

Berlowitz DR, Ratliff C, Cuddigan J, Rodeheaver GT; National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel.

Adv Skin Wound Care. 2005 Nov-Dec;18(9):480-3.

PMID:
16365545
19.

Validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales; Cubbin and Jackson, Braden, and Douglas scale.

Jun Seongsook RN, Jeong Ihnsook RN, Lee Younghee RN.

Int J Nurs Stud. 2004 Feb;41(2):199-204.

PMID:
14725784
20.

Reliability testing of the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators pressure ulcer indicator.

Hart S, Bergquist S, Gajewski B, Dunton N.

J Nurs Care Qual. 2006 Jul-Sep;21(3):256-65.

PMID:
16816607
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk