Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 103

1.
2.

The feasibility of using pattern recognition software to measure the influence of computer use on the consultation.

de Lusignan S, Wilson E, Dyble A, Grant T, Theadom A, Chan T.

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2003 Nov 26;3:12.

3.

A framework for comparing video methods used to assess the clinical consultation: a qualitative study.

Leong A, Koczan P, De Lusignan S, Sheeler I.

Med Inform Internet Med. 2006 Dec;31(4):255-65.

PMID:
17135058
4.

The patient, the doctor and the emergency department: a cross-sectional study of patient-centredness in 1990 and 2005.

Dale J, Sandhu H, Lall R, Glucksman E.

Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Aug;72(2):320-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.02.005. Epub 2008 May 20. Erratum in: Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Feb;74(2):278.

PMID:
18495410
5.

The feasibility of using UML to compare the impact of different brands of computer system on the clinical consultation.

Kumarapeli P, de Lusignan S, Koczan P, Jones B, Sheeler I.

Inform Prim Care. 2007;15(4):245-53.

6.

A comparison of videotape and audiotape assessment of patient-centredness in family physicians' consultations.

Weingarten MA, Yaphe J, Blumenthal D, Oren M, Margalit A.

Patient Educ Couns. 2001 Nov;45(2):107-10.

PMID:
11687323
7.
8.

Talking with the alien: interaction with computers in the GP consultation.

Dowell A, Stubbe M, Scott-Dowell K, Macdonald L, Dew K.

Aust J Prim Health. 2013;19(4):275-82. doi: 10.1071/PY13036.

PMID:
24070141
9.

Verbal and non-verbal behavior of doctors and patients in primary care consultations - how this relates to patient enablement.

Pawlikowska T, Zhang W, Griffiths F, van Dalen J, van der Vleuten C.

Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Jan;86(1):70-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.04.019. Epub 2011 May 28.

PMID:
21621365
11.

Computers in the new consultation: within the first minute.

Pearce C, Trumble S, Arnold M, Dwan K, Phillips C.

Fam Pract. 2008 Jun;25(3):202-8. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmn018. Epub 2008 May 25.

12.

Verbal prescribing in general practice consultations.

Gibson M, Neil Jenkings K, Wilson R, Purves I.

Soc Sci Med. 2006 Sep;63(6):1684-98. Epub 2006 Jun 9.

PMID:
16762470
13.

Measuring the impact of different brands of computer systems on the clinical consultation: a pilot study.

Refsum C, Kumarapeli P, Gunaratne A, Dodds R, Hasan A, de Lusignan S.

Inform Prim Care. 2008;16(2):119-27.

15.

Factors that influence the patient centredness of a consultation.

Law SA, Britten N.

Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Oct;45(399):520-4.

16.

The ALFA (Activity Log Files Aggregation) toolkit: a method for precise observation of the consultation.

de Lusignan S, Kumarapeli P, Chan T, Pflug B, van Vlymen J, Jones B, Freeman GK.

J Med Internet Res. 2008 Sep 8;10(4):e27. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1080.

17.

Using an open source observational tool to measure the influence of the doctor's consulting style and the computer system on the outcomes of the clinical consultation.

De Lusignan S, Kumarapeli P, Debar S, Kushniruk AW, Pearce C.

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;150:1017-21.

PMID:
19745467
18.

Using the computer in the clinical consultation; setting the stage, reviewing, recording, and taking actions: multi-channel video study.

Kumarapeli P, de Lusignan S.

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jun;20(e1):e67-75. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001081. Epub 2012 Dec 15.

19.

Provider interaction with the electronic health record: the effects on patient-centered communication in medical encounters.

Street RL Jr, Liu L, Farber NJ, Chen Y, Calvitti A, Zuest D, Gabuzda MT, Bell K, Gray B, Rick S, Ashfaq S, Agha Z.

Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Sep;96(3):315-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.004. Epub 2014 May 14.

20.

Assessing the impact of recording quality target data on the GP consultation using multi-channel video.

Moulene MV, de Lusignan S, Freeman G, van Vlymen J, Sheeler I, Singleton A, Kumarapeli P.

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;129(Pt 2):1132-6.

PMID:
17911892
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk