Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 213

1.

Effect of government actions on technological innovation for SO2 control.

Taylor MR, Rubin ES, Hounshell DA.

Environ Sci Technol. 2003 Oct 15;37(20):4527-34. Review.

PMID:
14594357
2.

Technology innovations and experience curves for nitrogen oxides control technologies.

Yeh S, Rubin ES, Taylor MR, Hounshell DA.

J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2005 Dec;55(12):1827-38.

PMID:
16408687
3.

Flue gas desulfurization: the state of the art.

Srivastava RK, Jozewicz W.

J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2001 Dec;51(12):1676-88.

PMID:
15666473
4.

Synergistic mercury removal by conventional pollutant control strategies for coal-fired power plants in China.

Wang S, Zhang L, Wu Y, Ancora MP, Zhao Y, Hao J.

J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2010 Jun;60(6):722-30.

PMID:
20564998
5.

Acid deposition and integrated zoning control in China.

Li W, Gao J.

Environ Manage. 2002 Aug;30(2):169-82.

PMID:
12105759
7.

Is EPA blocking clean coal technology?

Pelley J.

Environ Sci Technol. 2007 Jan 1;41(1):11-2. No abstract available.

PMID:
17265920
8.

Mercury policy and regulations for coal-fired power plants.

Rallo M, Lopez-Anton MA, Contreras ML, Maroto-Valer MM.

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2012 May;19(4):1084-96. doi: 10.1007/s11356-011-0658-2. Epub 2011 Nov 17. Review.

PMID:
22090257
9.

Historical analysis of SO2 pollution control policies in China.

Gao C, Yin H, Ai N, Huang Z.

Environ Manage. 2009 Mar;43(3):447-57. doi: 10.1007/s00267-008-9252-x. Epub 2009 Jan 22.

PMID:
19159968
10.

Nitrogen oxides emission control options for coal-fired electric utility boilers.

Srivastava RK, Hall RE, Khan S, Culligan K, Lani BW.

J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2005 Sep;55(9):1367-88. Review.

PMID:
16259432
11.

Improvements in the operation of SO2 scrubbers in China's coal power plants.

Xu Y.

Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Jan 15;45(2):380-5. doi: 10.1021/es1025678. Epub 2010 Dec 2.

PMID:
21126067
12.

Supply curves for using powder river basin coal to reduce sulfur emissions.

Malvadkar SB, Smith D, McGurl GV.

J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2004 Jun;54(6):741-9.

PMID:
15242153
13.

Effects of public health interventions on industrial emissions and ambient air in Cartagena, Spain.

Cirera L, Rodríguez M, Giménez J, Jiménez E, Saez M, Guillén JJ, Medrano J, Martínez-Victoria MA, Ballester F, Moreno-Grau S, Navarro C.

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2009 Mar;16(2):152-61. doi: 10.1007/s11356-008-0091-3. Epub 2008 Dec 23.

PMID:
19104864
14.

The changing environment for technological innovation in health care.

Goodman CS, Gelijns AC.

Baxter Health Policy Rev. 1996;2:267-315.

PMID:
11066263
15.

Modeling the effects of changes in new source review on national SO2 and NOx emissions from electricity-generating units.

Evans DA, Hobbs BF, Oren C, Palmer KL.

Environ Sci Technol. 2008 Jan 15;42(2):347-53.

PMID:
18284129
16.

U.S.-Canada cooperation: the U.S.-Canada air quality agreement.

McLean B, Barton J.

J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2008;71(9-10):564-9. doi: 10.1080/15287390801997567.

PMID:
18569627
17.

Air quality impact of the coal-fired power plants in the northern passageway of the China West-East Power Transmission Project.

Xue Z, Hao J, Chai F, Duan N, Chen Y, Li J, Chen F, Liu S, Pu W.

J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2005 Dec;55(12):1816-26.

PMID:
16408686
18.

Canada, U.S. fight acid rain.

Smith RB.

Occup Health Saf. 1991 Nov;60(11):45-6. No abstract available.

PMID:
1808577
19.

Control of mercury vapor emissions from combustion flue gas.

Yan R, Liang DT, Tay JH.

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2003;10(6):399-407. Review.

PMID:
14690030
20.

Potential flue gas impurities in carbon dioxide streams separated from coal-fired power plants.

Lee JY, Keener TC, Yang YJ.

J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2009 Jun;59(6):725-32.

PMID:
19603740
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk