Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 205

1.

Comparison of automated versus vacuum-assisted biopsy methods for sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast.

Philpotts LE, Hooley RJ, Lee CH.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 Feb;180(2):347-51.

PMID:
12540431
2.

Sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast: comparison of 14-gauge automated gun and 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy methods.

Cho N, Moon WK, Cha JH, Kim SM, Kim SJ, Lee SH, Chung HK, Cho KS, Park IA, Noh DY.

Korean J Radiol. 2005 Apr-Jun;6(2):102-9.

3.
4.

Atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ as revealed by large-core needle breast biopsy: results of surgical excision.

Darling ML, Smith DN, Lester SC, Kaelin C, Selland DL, Denison CM, DiPiro PJ, Rose DI, Rhei E, Meyer JE.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Nov;175(5):1341-6.

PMID:
11044038
5.

[Comparison of sonographically guided vacuum-assisted and automated core-needle breast biopsy methods].

Semiz Oysu A, Kaya H, Güllüoğlu B, Aribal E.

Tani Girisim Radyol. 2004 Mar;10(1):44-7. Turkish.

6.

Core needle breast biopsy in patients undergoing anticoagulation therapy: preliminary results.

Melotti MK, Berg WA.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Jan;174(1):245-9.

PMID:
10628487
7.

Comparison of the underestimation rate in cases with ductal carcinoma in situ at ultrasound-guided core biopsy: 14-gauge automated core-needle biopsy vs 8- or 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy.

Suh YJ, Kim MJ, Kim EK, Moon HJ, Kwak JY, Koo HR, Yoon JH.

Br J Radiol. 2012 Aug;85(1016):e349-56. doi: 10.1259/bjr/30974918. Epub 2012 Mar 14.

8.
9.
11.

[US-guided core biopsy of the breast with an automated biopsy gun: comparison with an aspiration core needle device].

Taki S, Kakuda K, Kakuma K, Annen Y, Kiyohara K, Kosugi M.

Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi. 1997 Jan;57(1):1-4. Japanese.

PMID:
9038055
12.
13.
14.

Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: our experience and comparison with stereotactic automated needle biopsy.

Tothova L, Rauova K, Valkovic L, Vanovcanova L, Lehotska V.

Bratisl Lek Listy. 2013;114(2):71-7.

PMID:
23331202
15.

Underestimation of atypical ductal hyperplasia at sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast.

Jang M, Cho N, Moon WK, Park JS, Seong MH, Park IA.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Nov;191(5):1347-51. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.3643.

PMID:
18941067
16.

Accuracy and complication rates of US-guided vacuum-assisted core breast biopsy: initial results.

Simon JR, Kalbhen CL, Cooper RA, Flisak ME.

Radiology. 2000 Jun;215(3):694-7.

PMID:
10831686
17.

Breast lesions with imaging-histologic discordance during 16-gauge core needle biopsy system: would vacuum-assisted removal get significantly more definitive histologic diagnosis than vacuum-assisted biopsy?

Wang ZL, Liu G, Li JL, Su L, Liu XJ, Wang W, Tang J.

Breast J. 2011 Sep-Oct;17(5):456-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2011.01128.x. Epub 2011 Jul 15.

PMID:
21762244
18.

Stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: a validation study.

Pfarl G, Helbich TH, Riedl CC, Wagner T, Gnant M, Rudas M, Liberman L.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Dec;179(6):1503-7.

PMID:
12438044
19.

Breast lesions with imaging-histologic discordance during US-guided 14G automated core biopsy: can the directional vacuum-assisted removal replace the surgical excision? Initial findings.

Kim MJ, Kim EK, Lee JY, Youk JH, Park BW, Kim SI, Kim H, Oh KK.

Eur Radiol. 2007 Sep;17(9):2376-83. Epub 2007 Mar 15. Erratum in: Eur Radiol. 2007 Dec;17(12):3261.

PMID:
17361422
20.
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk