Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 282

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 12165640)

1.

Performance of diagnostic mammography for women with signs or symptoms of breast cancer.

Barlow WE, Lehman CD, Zheng Y, Ballard-Barbash R, Yankaskas BC, Cutter GR, Carney PA, Geller BM, Rosenberg R, Kerlikowske K, Weaver DL, Taplin SH.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002 Aug 7;94(15):1151-9.

2.

Physician predictors of mammographic accuracy.

Smith-Bindman R, Chu P, Miglioretti DL, Quale C, Rosenberg RD, Cutter G, Geller B, Bacchetti P, Sickles EA, Kerlikowske K.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Mar 2;97(5):358-67.

3.
4.

Effect of previous benign breast biopsy on the interpretive performance of subsequent screening mammography.

Taplin SH, Abraham L, Geller BM, Yankaskas BC, Buist DS, Smith-Bindman R, Lehman C, Weaver D, Carney PA, Barlow WE.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Jul 21;102(14):1040-51. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq233. Epub 2010 Jul 2.

5.

Effect of estrogen replacement therapy on the specificity and sensitivity of screening mammography.

Laya MB, Larson EB, Taplin SH, White E.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996 May 15;88(10):643-9.

6.

Diagnostic mammography performance and race: outcomes in Black and White women.

Yankaskas BC, Gill KS.

Cancer. 2005 Dec 15;104(12):2671-81.

7.

Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography.

Ernster VL, Ballard-Barbash R, Barlow WE, Zheng Y, Weaver DL, Cutter G, Yankaskas BC, Rosenberg R, Carney PA, Kerlikowske K, Taplin SH, Urban N, Geller BM.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002 Oct 16;94(20):1546-54.

8.

Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers.

Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL, White D, Finder CA, Taplin SH, White E.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Jul 5;92(13):1081-7.

9.

Factors affecting sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography and MRI in women with an inherited risk for breast cancer.

Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Obdeijn IM, Boetes C, Zonderland HM, Muller SH, Kok T, Manoliu RA, Besnard AP, Tilanus-Linthorst MM, Seynaeve C, Bartels CC, Kaas R, Meijer S, Oosterwijk JC, Hoogerbrugge N, Tollenaar RA, Rutgers EJ, de Koning HJ, Klijn JG.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006 Nov;100(1):109-19. Epub 2006 Jun 22.

PMID:
16791481
10.

Biennial versus annual mammography and the risk of late-stage breast cancer.

White E, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC, Geller BM, Rosenberg RD, Kerlikowske K, Saba L, Vacek PM, Carney PA, Buist DS, Oestreicher N, Barlow W, Ballard-Barbash R, Taplin SH.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Dec 15;96(24):1832-9.

11.

The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of screening mammography and symptomatic status.

Kavanagh AM, Giles GG, Mitchell H, Cawson JN.

J Med Screen. 2000;7(2):105-10.

PMID:
11002452
12.

Rate of breast cancer diagnoses among postmenopausal women with self-reported breast symptoms.

Aiello EJ, Buist DS, White E, Seger D, Taplin SH.

J Am Board Fam Pract. 2004 Nov-Dec;17(6):408-15.

13.

Factors contributing to mammography failure in women aged 40-49 years.

Buist DS, Porter PL, Lehman C, Taplin SH, White E.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Oct 6;96(19):1432-40.

14.

Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening.

Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, Yaffe M, Baum JK, Acharyya S, Conant EF, Fajardo LL, Bassett L, D'Orsi C, Jong R, Rebner M; Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial (DMIST) Investigators Group.

N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 27;353(17):1773-83. Epub 2005 Sep 16. Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2006 Oct 26;355(17):1840.

15.

The positive predictive value for diagnosis of breast cancer full-field digital mammography versus film-screen mammography in the diagnostic mammographic population.

Seo BK, Pisano ED, Kuzmiak CM, Koomen M, Pavic D, McLelland R, Lee Y, Cole EB, Mattingly D, Lee J.

Acad Radiol. 2006 Oct;13(10):1229-35.

PMID:
16979072
16.

Frequency and predictive value of a mammographic recommendation for short-interval follow-up.

Yasmeen S, Romano PS, Pettinger M, Chlebowski RT, Robbins JA, Lane DS, Hendrix SL.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 Mar 19;95(6):429-36.

17.

[Evaluation of scintimammography as an additional test to conventional mammography in detection of breast cancer].

Cwikła JB, Buscombe JR, Kolasińska AD, Holloway B, Hilson AJ.

Ginekol Pol. 2003 May;74(5):362-70. Polish.

PMID:
12931463
18.

The influence of knowledge of mammography findings on the accuracy of breast ultrasound in symptomatic women.

Houssami N, Irwig L, Simpson JM, McKessar M, Blome S, Noakes J.

Breast J. 2005 May-Jun;11(3):167-72.

PMID:
15871700
19.

Endogenous hormone levels, mammographic density, and subsequent risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women.

Tamimi RM, Byrne C, Colditz GA, Hankinson SE.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Aug 1;99(15):1178-87. Epub 2007 Jul 24.

20.

Variability of interpretive accuracy among diagnostic mammography facilities.

Jackson SL, Taplin SH, Sickles EA, Abraham L, Barlow WE, Carney PA, Geller B, Berns EA, Cutter GR, Elmore JG.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Jun 3;101(11):814-27. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp105. Epub 2009 May 26.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk