Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 333

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 12061481)

2.

The impact of genetic counselling on risk perception and mental health in women with a family history of breast cancer.

Watson M, Lloyd S, Davidson J, Meyer L, Eeles R, Ebbs S, Murday V.

Br J Cancer. 1999 Feb;79(5-6):868-74.

3.

Psychological impact of genetic counseling for familial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Braithwaite D, Emery J, Walter F, Prevost AT, Sutton S.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Jan 21;96(2):122-33. Review.

4.

The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women's risk perceptions and levels of distress.

Cull A, Anderson ED, Campbell S, Mackay J, Smyth E, Steel M.

Br J Cancer. 1999 Feb;79(3-4):501-8.

5.

Psychological impact of genetic counseling for familial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Braithwaite D, Emery J, Walter F, Prevost AT, Sutton S.

Fam Cancer. 2006;5(1):61-75. Review.

PMID:
16528610
6.

Psychological outcomes and risk perception after genetic testing and counselling in breast cancer: a systematic review.

Butow PN, Lobb EA, Meiser B, Barratt A, Tucker KM.

Med J Aust. 2003 Jan 20;178(2):77-81. Review.

PMID:
12526728
7.

Long-term outcomes of genetic counseling in women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast cancer.

Meiser B, Butow PN, Barratt AL, Schnieden V, Gattas M, Kirk J, Gaff C, Suthers G, Tucker K; Psychological Impact Collaborative Group.

Patient Educ Couns. 2001 Sep;44(3):215-25.

PMID:
11553422
8.

Risk assessment of first-degree relatives of women with breast cancer: a feasibility study.

Hurt GJ, McQuellon RP, Michielutte R, Conrad DM, Carter S, Anderson H.

Oncol Nurs Forum. 2001 Aug;28(7):1097-104.

PMID:
11517843
9.

Psychological support needs for women at high genetic risk of breast cancer: some preliminary indicators.

Hopwood P, Keeling F, Long A, Pool C, Evans G, Howell A.

Psychooncology. 1998 Sep-Oct;7(5):402-12.

PMID:
9809331
10.

Psychological adjustment among male partners in response to women's breast/ovarian cancer risk: a theoretical review of the literature.

Sherman KA, Kasparian NA, Mireskandari S.

Psychooncology. 2010 Jan;19(1):1-11. doi: 10.1002/pon.1582. Review.

PMID:
19472298
11.

Family history of breast cancer: what do women understand and recall about their genetic risk?

Watson M, Duvivier V, Wade Walsh M, Ashley S, Davidson J, Papaikonomou M, Murday V, Sacks N, Eeles R.

J Med Genet. 1998 Sep;35(9):731-8.

12.
13.

Cancer-specific worry interference in women attending a breast and ovarian cancer risk evaluation program: impact on emotional distress and health functioning.

Trask PC, Paterson AG, Wang C, Hayasaka S, Milliron KJ, Blumberg LR, Gonzalez R, Murray S, Merajver SD.

Psychooncology. 2001 Sep-Oct;10(5):349-60.

PMID:
11536413
14.

Psychological distress in women seeking genetic counseling for breast-ovarian cancer risk: the contributions of personality and appraisal.

Audrain J, Schwartz MD, Lerman C, Hughes C, Peshkin BN, Biesecker B.

Ann Behav Med. 1997 Fall;19(4):370-7.

PMID:
9706364
16.

A literature review of the psychological impact of genetic testing on breast cancer patients.

Schlich-Bakker KJ, ten Kroode HF, Ausems MG.

Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Jul;62(1):13-20. Epub 2005 Oct 19. Review.

PMID:
16242293
17.

Psychological distress in women at risk of hereditary breast/ovarian or HNPCC cancers in the absence of demonstrated mutations.

Geirdal AØ, Reichelt JG, Dahl AA, Heimdal K, Maehle L, Stormorken A, Møller P.

Fam Cancer. 2005;4(2):121-6.

PMID:
15951962
18.

Psychological counseling strategies for women at risk of breast cancer.

Kash KM, Holland JC, Osborne MP, Miller DG.

J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1995;(17):73-9.

PMID:
8573459
19.

Cancer genetic risk assessment for individuals at risk of familial breast cancer.

Hilgart JS, Coles B, Iredale R.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 15;2:CD003721. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003721.pub3. Review.

PMID:
22336791
20.

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: diagnostic strategies and their implications.

Bonis PA, Trikalinos TA, Chung M, Chew P, Ip S, DeVine DA, Lau J.

Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007 May;(150):1-180. Review.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk