Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 306

1.

Compomers as Class II restorations in primary molars.

Gross LC, Griffen AL, Casamassimo PS.

Pediatr Dent. 2001 Jan-Feb;23(1):24-7.

PMID:
11242726
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

Class V lesions restored with four different tooth-colored materials--3-year results.

Folwaczny M, Loher C, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R.

Clin Oral Investig. 2001 Mar;5(1):31-9.

PMID:
11355096
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

Clinical evaluation of compomer in primary teeth: 1-year results.

Hse KM, Wei SH.

J Am Dent Assoc. 1997 Aug;128(8):1088-96.

PMID:
9260418
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

Clinical evaluation of composite and compomer restorations in primary teeth: 24-month results.

Pascon FM, Kantovitz KR, Caldo-Teixeira AS, Borges AF, Silva TN, Puppin-Rontani RM, Garcia-Godoy F.

J Dent. 2006 Jul;34(6):381-8. Epub 2005 Oct 18.

PMID:
16242232
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

Two-year clinical evaluation of three restorative materials in primary molars.

Daou MH, Tavernier B, Meyer JM.

J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2009 Fall;34(1):53-8.

PMID:
19953810
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite.

Attin T, Opatowski A, Meyer C, Zingg-Meyer B, Buchalla W, Mönting JS.

Am J Dent. 2001 Jun;14(3):148-52.

PMID:
11572292
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study.

Folwaczny M, Loher C, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hinkel R.

Oper Dent. 2000 Jul-Aug;25(4):251-8.

PMID:
11203827
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Durability of a polyacid-modified composite resin (compomer) in primary molars. A multicenter study.

Andersson-Wenckert IE, Folkesson UH, van Dijken JW.

Acta Odontol Scand. 1997 Aug;55(4):255-60.

PMID:
9298168
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Clinical performance of a compomer and amalgam for the interproximal restoration of primary molars: a 24-month evaluation.

Duggal MS, Toumba KJ, Sharma NK.

Br Dent J. 2002 Sep 28;193(6):339-42.

PMID:
12368893
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
10.

Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions.

Ermiş RB.

Quintessence Int. 2002 Jul-Aug;33(7):542-8.

PMID:
12165991
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Class II restorations with a polyacid-modified composite resin in primary molars placed in a dental practice: results of a two-year clinical evaluation.

Attin T, Opatowski A, Meyer C, Zingg-Meyer B, Mönting JS.

Oper Dent. 2000 Jul-Aug;25(4):259-64.

PMID:
11203828
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Clinical evaluation of paired compomer and glass ionomer restorations in primary molars: final results after 42 months.

Welbury RR, Shaw AJ, Murray JJ, Gordon PH, McCabe JF.

Br Dent J. 2000 Jul 22;189(2):93-7.

PMID:
10975160
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Randomised trial of resin-based restorations in Class I and Class II beveled preparations in primary molars: 48-month results.

Alves dos Santos MP, Luiz RR, Maia LC.

J Dent. 2010 Jun;38(6):451-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.02.004. Epub 2010 Feb 25.

PMID:
20188783
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Durability of new restorative materials in Class III cavities.

van Dijken JW.

J Adhes Dent. 2001 Spring;3(1):65-70.

PMID:
11317385
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.

Kavvadia K, Kakaboura A, Vanderas AP, Papagiannoulis L.

Pediatr Dent. 2004 May-Jun;26(3):245-50.

PMID:
15185806
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Clinical performance of resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary teeth. A retrospective evaluation.

Croll TP, Bar-Zion Y, Segura A, Donly KJ.

J Am Dent Assoc. 2001 Aug;132(8):1110-6.

PMID:
11575018
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Class II restorations in primary teeth: 7-year study on three resin-modified glass ionomer cements and a compomer.

Qvist V, Laurberg L, Poulsen A, Teglers PT.

Eur J Oral Sci. 2004 Apr;112(2):188-96.

PMID:
15056118
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Clinical evaluation of polyacid-modified resin composite posterior restorations: one-year results.

Luo Y, Lo EC, Fang DT, Wei SH.

Quintessence Int. 2000 Oct;31(9):630-6.

PMID:
11203987
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

Clinical evaluation of four Class 5 restorative materials: 3-year recall.

Burgess JO, Gallo JR, Ripps AH, Walker RS, Ireland EJ.

Am J Dent. 2004 Jun;17(3):147-50.

PMID:
15301207
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and a compomer in restoring non-carious cervical lesions. 5-year results.

Folwaczny M, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R.

Am J Dent. 2001 Jun;14(3):153-6.

PMID:
11572293
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk