Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 130

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 10619342)

1.

Fish allergy: is cross-reactivity among fish species relevant? Double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge studies of fish allergic adults.

Helbling A, Haydel R Jr, McCants ML, Musmand JJ, El-Dahr J, Lehrer SB.

Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1999 Dec;83(6 Pt 1):517-23.

PMID:
10619342
2.

Fish collagen allergy: a pitfall of the prick-to-prick test with raw fish.

Chikazawa S, Hashimoto T, Kobayashi Y, Satoh T.

Br J Dermatol. 2015 Jun 25. doi: 10.1111/bjd.13962. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
26111301
3.

Historical background, definitions and differential diagnosis.

Sampson HA.

Chem Immunol Allergy. 2015;101:1-7. doi: 10.1159/000371644. Epub 2015 May 21.

PMID:
26022859
4.

The impact of double-blind placebo- controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) on the socioeconomic cost of food allergy in Europe.

Cerecedo I, Zamora J, Fox M, Voordouw J, Plana N, Rokicka E, Fernandez-Rivas M, Vázquez Cortés S, Reche M, Fiandor A, Kowalski M, Antonides G, Mugford M, Frewer LJ, De la Hoz B.

J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2014;24(6):418-24.

PMID:
25668893
5.

Loss-of-function variants of the filaggrin gene are associated with clinical reactivity to foods.

van Ginkel CD, Flokstra-de Blok BM, Kollen BJ, Kukler J, Koppelman GH, Dubois AE.

Allergy. 2015 Apr;70(4):461-4. doi: 10.1111/all.12569. Epub 2015 Jan 26.

PMID:
25620092
6.

Epinephrine use in positive oral food challenges performed as a screening test for food allergy therapy trials.

Noone S, Ross J, Sampson HA, Wang J.

J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2015 May-Jun;3(3):424-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2014.10.008. Epub 2015 Jan 13.

PMID:
25609353
7.

Standardized food challenges are subject to variability in interpretation of clinical symptoms.

van Erp FC, Knulst AC, Meijer Y, Gabriele C, van der Ent CK.

Clin Transl Allergy. 2014 Nov 30;4(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13601-014-0043-6. eCollection 2014.

8.

[Food allergy diagnosis in patients with elimination diet history. Preliminary report].

Navarrete-Rodríguez EM, Del Río-Navarro BE, Pozo-Beltrán CF, García-Fajardo DE, Saucedo-Ramírez OJ, Castelán-Chávez EE.

Rev Alerg Mex. 2014 Oct-Dec;61(4):298-304. Spanish.

PMID:
25473867
9.

Differences between observers in interpreting double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges: a randomized trial.

Brand PL, Landzaat-Berghuizen MA.

Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2014 Dec;25(8):755-9. doi: 10.1111/pai.12313.

PMID:
25403147
10.

Hazelnut allergy differs between children and adults in frequency of severity, aetiology and relevance of diagnostic parameters.

Masthoff LJ, van Hoffen E, de Reus A, Boonacker CW, Bruijnzeel-Koomen CA, Pasmans SG, Knulst AC.

Clin Exp Allergy. 2014 Dec;44(12):1539-45. doi: 10.1111/cea.12440.

PMID:
25333730
11.

Specific IgE to fish extracts does not predict allergy to specific species within an adult fish allergic population.

Schulkes KJ, Klemans RJ, Knigge L, de Bruin-Weller M, Bruijnzeel-Koomen CA, Marknell deWitt A, Lidholm J, Knulst AC.

Clin Transl Allergy. 2014 Sep 1;4:27. doi: 10.1186/2045-7022-4-27. eCollection 2014.

12.

Angler fish is not an alternative in allergy to multiple fish species.

Azofra J, Maroto AS, Vivanco F, Pastor-Vargas C.

Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2014 Sep;113(3):323-4. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2014.06.008. Epub 2014 Jul 1. No abstract available.

PMID:
24996993
13.

Positive reactions to placebo in children undergoing double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge.

Ahrens B, Niggemann B, Wahn U, Beyer K.

Clin Exp Allergy. 2014 Apr;44(4):572-8. doi: 10.1111/cea.12284.

PMID:
24479560
14.

Plasma IL-25 is elevated in a subgroup of patients with clinical reactivity to peanut.

Aalberse JA, van Thuijl AO, Meijer Y, de Jager W, van der Palen-Merkus T, Sprikkelman AB, Hoekstra MO, Prakken BJ, van Wijk F.

Clin Transl Allergy. 2013 Dec 2;3(1):40. doi: 10.1186/2045-7022-3-40.

15.

Unexpected cross-reactivity in a cat-allergy patient. An allergic reaction at the circus.

Feleszko W, Zalewski BM, Kulus M.

Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2014 Nov-Dec;42(6):624-5. doi: 10.1016/j.aller.2013.06.008. Epub 2013 Aug 21. No abstract available.

PMID:
23972402
16.

Adverse reactions during drug challenges: a single US institution's experience.

Kao L, Rajan J, Roy L, Kavosh E, Khan DA.

Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2013 Feb;110(2):86-91.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2012.11.007. Epub 2012 Dec 17.

PMID:
23352526
17.

Asthma after chicken consumption due to cross-reactivity between fish and chicken parvalbumin.

González-de-Olano D, Bartolomé B, Maroto AS, Vivanco F, Pastor-Vargas C.

J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2012;22(3):227-8. No abstract available.

18.

Late type of bronchial response to milk ingestion challenge: a comparison of open and double-blind challenge.

Pelikan Z.

J Allergy (Cairo). 2012;2012:515267. doi: 10.1155/2012/515267. Epub 2011 Nov 3.

19.

Development of a standardized low-dose double-blind placebo-controlled challenge vehicle for the EuroPrevall project.

Cochrane SA, Salt LJ, Wantling E, Rogers A, Coutts J, Ballmer-Weber BK, Fritsche P, Fernández-Rivas M, Reig I, Knulst A, Le TM, Asero R, Beyer K, Golding M, Crevel R, Clare Mills EN, Mackie AR.

Allergy. 2012 Jan;67(1):107-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2011.02715.x. Epub 2011 Sep 19.

PMID:
22092081
20.

Evaluation and comparison of the species-specificity of 3 antiparvalbumin IgG antibodies.

Lee PW, Nordlee JA, Koppelman SJ, Baumert JL, Taylor SL.

J Agric Food Chem. 2011 Dec 14;59(23):12309-16. doi: 10.1021/jf203277z. Epub 2011 Nov 3.

PMID:
21999209
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk