Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 76


Patient preferences in randomised trials: threat or opportunity?

Torgerson DJ, Klaber-Moffett J, Russell IT.

J Health Serv Res Policy. 1996 Oct;1(4):194-7.


Conceptual framework and systematic review of the effects of participants' and professionals' preferences in randomised controlled trials.

King M, Nazareth I, Lampe F, Bower P, Chandler M, Morou M, Sibbald B, Lai R.

Health Technol Assess. 2005 Sep;9(35):1-186, iii-iv. Review.


The role of radiography in primary care patients with low back pain of at least 6 weeks duration: a randomised (unblinded) controlled trial.

Kendrick D, Fielding K, Bentley E, Miller P, Kerslake R, Pringle M.

Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(30):1-69.


Advice for the management of low back pain: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

Liddle SD, Gracey JH, Baxter GD.

Man Ther. 2007 Nov;12(4):310-27. Epub 2007 Mar 28. Review.


Longer term clinical and economic benefits of offering acupuncture care to patients with chronic low back pain.

Thomas KJ, MacPherson H, Ratcliffe J, Thorpe L, Brazier J, Campbell M, Fitter M, Roman M, Walters S, Nicholl JP.

Health Technol Assess. 2005 Aug;9(32):iii-iv, ix-x, 1-109.


Randomised controlled trials of conventional antipsychotic versus new atypical drugs, and new atypical drugs versus clozapine, in people with schizophrenia responding poorly to, or intolerant of, current drug treatment.

Lewis SW, Davies L, Jones PB, Barnes TR, Murray RM, Kerwin R, Taylor D, Hayhurst KP, Markwick A, Lloyd H, Dunn G.

Health Technol Assess. 2006 May;10(17):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-165.


Clinical effectiveness, tolerability and cost-effectiveness of newer drugs for epilepsy in adults: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Wilby J, Kainth A, Hawkins N, Epstein D, McIntosh H, McDaid C, Mason A, Golder S, O'Meara S, Sculpher M, Drummond M, Forbes C.

Health Technol Assess. 2005 Apr;9(15):1-157, iii-iv. Review.


Efficacy of spinal manipulation and mobilization for low back pain and neck pain: a systematic review and best evidence synthesis.

Bronfort G, Haas M, Evans RL, Bouter LM.

Spine J. 2004 May-Jun;4(3):335-56. Review.


Determinants of patients' treatment preferences in a clinical trial.

Awad MA, Shapiro SH, Lund JP, Feine JS.

Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2000 Apr;28(2):119-25.


Supplementation of a home-based exercise programme with a class-based programme for people with osteoarthritis of the knees: a randomised controlled trial and health economic analysis.

McCarthy CJ, Mills PM, Pullen R, Richardson G, Hawkins N, Roberts CR, Silman AJ, Oldham JA.

Health Technol Assess. 2004 Nov;8(46):iii-iv, 1-61. Review.


Lay public's understanding of equipoise and randomisation in randomised controlled trials.

Robinson EJ, Kerr CE, Stevens AJ, Lilford RJ, Braunholtz DA, Edwards SJ, Beck SR, Rowley MG.

Health Technol Assess. 2005 Mar;9(8):1-192, iii-iv.


Stepped treatment of older adults on laxatives. The STOOL trial.

Mihaylov S, Stark C, McColl E, Steen N, Vanoli A, Rubin G, Curless R, Barton R, Bond J.

Health Technol Assess. 2008 May;12(13):iii-iv, ix-139.


What do patients really want? Patients' preferences for treatment for angina.

Bowling A, Culliford L, Smith D, Rowe G, Reeves BC.

Health Expect. 2008 Jun;11(2):137-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00482.x.


Cost-effectiveness of functional cardiac testing in the diagnosis and management of coronary artery disease: a randomised controlled trial. The CECaT trial.

Sharples L, Hughes V, Crean A, Dyer M, Buxton M, Goldsmith K, Stone D.

Health Technol Assess. 2007 Dec;11(49):iii-iv, ix-115.


Absorbent products for urinary/faecal incontinence: a comparative evaluation of key product designs.

Fader M, Cottenden A, Getliffe K, Gage H, Clarke-O'Neill S, Jamieson K, Green N, Williams P, Brooks R, Malone-Lee J.

Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jul;12(29):iii-iv, ix-185. Review.


Using routine data to complement and enhance the results of randomised controlled trials.

Lewsey JD, Leyland AH, Murray GD, Boddy FA.

Health Technol Assess. 2000;4(22):1-55.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk