Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 15

1.

Using evoked compound action potentials to assess activation of electrodes and predict C-levels in the Tempo+ cochlear implant speech processor.

Alvarez I, de la Torre A, Sainz M, Roldán C, Schoesser H, Spitzer P.

Ear Hear. 2010 Feb;31(1):134-45. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181bdb88f.

PMID:
19838116
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

Relation of electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds to behavioral T- and C-levels in children with cochlear implants.

Holstad BA, Sonneveldt VG, Fears BT, Davidson LS, Aaron RJ, Richter M, Matusofsky M, Brenner CA, Strube MJ, Skinner MW.

Ear Hear. 2009 Feb;30(1):115-27. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181906c0f.

PMID:
19125034
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

Use of neural response telemetry measures to objectively set the comfort levels in the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant.

King JE, Polak M, Hodges AV, Payne S, Telischi FF.

J Am Acad Audiol. 2006 Jun;17(6):413-31; quiz 462.

PMID:
16866005
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.
5.

Changes over time in electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance values in children using the Nucleus 24M cochlear implant.

Henkin Y, Kaplan-Neeman R, Muchnik C, Kronenberg J, Hildesheimer M.

Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2003 Aug;67(8):873-80.

PMID:
12880667
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

A longitudinal study of electrode impedance, the electrically evoked compound action potential, and behavioral measures in nucleus 24 cochlear implant users.

Hughes ML, Vander Werff KR, Brown CJ, Abbas PJ, Kelsay DM, Teagle HF, Lowder MW.

Ear Hear. 2001 Dec;22(6):471-86.

PMID:
11770670
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the nucleus 24 speech processor: data from adults.

Brown CJ, Hughes ML, Luk B, Abbas PJ, Wolaver A, Gervais J.

Ear Hear. 2000 Apr;21(2):151-63.

PMID:
10777022
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Post-operative stapedius reflex tests with simultaneous loudness scaling in patients supplied with cochlear implants.

Stephan K, Welzl-Müller K.

Audiology. 2000 Jan-Feb;39(1):13-8.

PMID:
10749066
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Relationship between EABR thresholds and levels used to program the CLARION speech processor.

Brown CJ, Hughes ML, Lopez SM, Abbas PJ.

Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1999 Apr;177:50-7.

PMID:
10214802
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Long-term stability of fitting parameters with the COMBI 40.

Schmidt M, Griesser A.

Am J Otol. 1997 Nov;18(6 Suppl):S109-10.

PMID:
9391621
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Electrical middle ear muscle reflex: use in cochlear implant programming.

Hodges AV, Balkany TJ, Ruth RA, Lambert PR, Dolan-Ash S, Schloffman JJ.

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997 Sep;117(3 Pt 1):255-61.

PMID:
9334774
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

The effect of loudness imbalance between electrodes in cochlear implant users.

Dawson PW, Skok M, Clark GM.

Ear Hear. 1997 Apr;18(2):156-65.

PMID:
9099565
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Relationships among comfort levels determined by cochlear implant patient's self-programming, audiologist's programming, and electrical stapedius reflex thresholds.

Shallop JK, Ash KR.

Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1995 Sep;166:175-6. No abstract available.

PMID:
7668623
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

Better speech recognition with cochlear implants.

Wilson BS, Finley CC, Lawson DT, Wolford RD, Eddington DK, Rabinowitz WM.

Nature. 1991 Jul 18;352(6332):236-8.

PMID:
1857418
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk