Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 30

1.

Chapter 8: meta-analysis of test performance when there is a "gold standard".

Trikalinos TA, Balion CM, Coleman CI, Griffith L, Santaguida PL, Vandermeer B, Fu R.

J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jun;27 Suppl 1:S56-66. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2029-1.

PMID:
22648676
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
2.

Chapter 1: Introduction to the Methods Guide for Medical Test Reviews.

Matchar DB.

J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jun;27 Suppl 1:S4-10. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1798-2.

PMID:
22648669
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
5.

Using the principles of randomized controlled trial design to guide test evaluation.

Lord SJ, Irwig L, Bossuyt PM.

Med Decis Making. 2009 Sep-Oct;29(5):E1-E12. doi: 10.1177/0272989X09340584. Epub 2009 Sep 22.

PMID:
19773580
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

Decision-analytic modeling to evaluate benefits and harms of medical tests: uses and limitations.

Trikalinos TA, Siebert U, Lau J.

Med Decis Making. 2009 Sep-Oct;29(5):E22-9. doi: 10.1177/0272989X09345022. Epub 2009 Sep 4.

PMID:
19734441
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Additional patient outcomes and pathways in evaluations of testing.

Bossuyt PM, McCaffery K.

Med Decis Making. 2009 Sep-Oct;29(5):E30-8. doi: 10.1177/0272989X09347013. Epub 2009 Sep 2.

PMID:
19726782
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Expected value of perfect information: an empirical example of reducing decision uncertainty by conducting additional research.

Oostenbrink JB, Al MJ, Oppe M, Rutten-van Mölken MP.

Value Health. 2008 Dec;11(7):1070-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00389.x.

PMID:
19602213
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Enhancing value of information analyses.

Janssen MP, Koffijberg H.

Value Health. 2009 Sep;12(6):935-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00548.x. Epub 2009 May 6.

PMID:
19432841
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Evaluating test strategies for colorectal cancer screening: a decision analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Zauber AG, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Knudsen AB, Wilschut J, van Ballegooijen M, Kuntz KM.

Ann Intern Med. 2008 Nov 4;149(9):659-69. Epub 2008 Oct 6.

PMID:
18838717
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
11.

Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Ann Intern Med. 2008 Nov 4;149(9):627-37. Epub 2008 Oct 6.

PMID:
18838716
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

A review and critique of modelling in prioritising and designing screening programmes.

Karnon J, Goyder E, Tappenden P, McPhie S, Towers I, Brazier J, Madan J.

Health Technol Assess. 2007 Dec;11(52):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-145. Review.

PMID:
18031651
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
13.

When is measuring sensitivity and specificity sufficient to evaluate a diagnostic test, and when do we need randomized trials?

Lord SJ, Irwig L, Simes RJ.

Ann Intern Med. 2006 Jun 6;144(11):850-5.

PMID:
16754927
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Good practice guidelines for decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment: a review and consolidation of quality assessment.

Philips Z, Bojke L, Sculpher M, Claxton K, Golder S.

Pharmacoeconomics. 2006;24(4):355-71. Review.

PMID:
16605282
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

Evaluating new screening tests for breast cancer.

Irwig L, Houssami N, Armstrong B, Glasziou P.

BMJ. 2006 Mar 25;332(7543):678-9. No abstract available.

PMID:
16565097
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
16.

Challenges in systematic reviews of diagnostic technologies.

Tatsioni A, Zarin DA, Aronson N, Samson DJ, Flamm CR, Schmid C, Lau J.

Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 2):1048-55. Review.

PMID:
15968029
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Primary stenting versus primary balloon angioplasty for treating acute myocardial infarction.

Nordmann AJ, Bucher H, Hengstler P, Harr T, Young J.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;(2):CD005313. Review.

PMID:
15846752
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.

Philips Z, Ginnelly L, Sculpher M, Claxton K, Golder S, Riemsma R, Woolacoot N, Glanville J.

Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. Review.

PMID:
15361314
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
19.

A pilot study on the use of decision theory and value of information analysis as part of the NHS Health Technology Assessment programme.

Claxton K, Ginnelly L, Sculpher M, Philips Z, Palmer S.

Health Technol Assess. 2004 Jul;8(31):1-103, iii.

PMID:
15248937
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
20.

Principles of good practice for decision analytic modeling in health-care evaluation: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Good Research Practices--Modeling Studies.

Weinstein MC, O'Brien B, Hornberger J, Jackson J, Johannesson M, McCabe C, Luce BR; ISPOR Task Force on Good Research Practices--Modeling Studies.

Value Health. 2003 Jan-Feb;6(1):9-17.

PMID:
12535234
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk