Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 20

1.

Infection after reamed intramedullary nailing of the tibia: a case series review.

Petrisor B, Anderson S, Court-Brown CM.

J Orthop Trauma. 2005 Aug;19(7):437-41.

PMID:
16056073
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations II: pilot study of a new system.

Atkins D, Briss PA, Eccles M, Flottorp S, Guyatt GH, Harbour RT, Hill S, Jaeschke R, Liberati A, Magrini N, Mason J, O'Connell D, Oxman AD, Phillips B, Schünemann H, Edejer TT, Vist GE, Williams JW Jr; GRADE Working Group.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2005 Mar 23;5(1):25.

PMID:
15788089
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
3.

Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group.

Atkins D, Eccles M, Flottorp S, Guyatt GH, Henry D, Hill S, Liberati A, O'Connell D, Oxman AD, Phillips B, Schünemann H, Edejer TT, Vist GE, Williams JW Jr; GRADE Working Group.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2004 Dec 22;4(1):38.

PMID:
15615589
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
4.

Users' guide to the surgical literature. How to assess a randomized controlled trial in surgery.

Thoma A, Farrokhyar F, Bhandari M, Tandan V; Evidence-Based Surgery Working Group.

Can J Surg. 2004 Jun;47(3):200-8. No abstract available.

PMID:
15264385
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
5.

Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.

Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, Eccles M, Falck-Ytter Y, Flottorp S, Guyatt GH, Harbour RT, Haugh MC, Henry D, Hill S, Jaeschke R, Leng G, Liberati A, Magrini N, Mason J, Middleton P, Mrukowicz J, O'Connell D, Oxman AD, Phillips B, Schünemann HJ, Edejer T, Varonen H, Vist GE, Williams JW Jr, Zaza S; GRADE Working Group.

BMJ. 2004 Jun 19;328(7454):1490.

PMID:
15205295
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
6.

Limiting loss to follow-up in a multicenter randomized trial in orthopedic surgery.

Sprague S, Leece P, Bhandari M, Tornetta P 3rd, Schemitsch E, Swiontkowski MF; S.P.R.I.N.T. Investigators.

Control Clin Trials. 2003 Dec;24(6):719-25.

PMID:
14662277
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Hierarchy of evidence: differences in results between non-randomized studies and randomized trials in patients with femoral neck fractures.

Bhandari M, Tornetta P 3rd, Ellis T, Audige L, Sprague S, Kuo JC, Swiontkowski MF.

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004 Jan;124(1):10-6. Epub 2003 Oct 24. Review.

PMID:
14576955
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

The relevance of the Women's Health Initiative results on combined hormone replacement therapy in clinical practice.

Lemay A.

J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2002 Sep;24(9):711-5.

PMID:
12360366
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.
10.

Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results From the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trial.

Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, LaCroix AZ, Kooperberg C, Stefanick ML, Jackson RD, Beresford SA, Howard BV, Johnson KC, Kotchen JM, Ockene J; Writing Group for the Women's Health Initiative Investigators.

JAMA. 2002 Jul 17;288(3):321-33.

PMID:
12117397
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

The CONSORT statement: explanation and elaboration. Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials.

Kessler KM.

Ann Intern Med. 2002 Jun 18;136(12):926-7; author reply 926-7. No abstract available.

PMID:
12069568
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

The CONSORT statement: explanation and elaboration. Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials.

Yuasa H.

Ann Intern Med. 2002 Jun 18;136(12):926-7; author reply 926-7. No abstract available.

PMID:
12069567
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Sample size slippages in randomised trials: exclusions and the lost and wayward.

Schulz KF, Grimes DA.

Lancet. 2002 Mar 2;359(9308):781-5.

PMID:
11888606
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Generation of allocation sequences in randomised trials: chance, not choice.

Schulz KF, Grimes DA.

Lancet. 2002 Feb 9;359(9305):515-9. Review.

PMID:
11853818
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs.

Concato J, Shah N, Horwitz RI.

N Engl J Med. 2000 Jun 22;342(25):1887-92.

PMID:
10861325
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
16.

The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials.

Kunz R, Oxman AD.

BMJ. 1998 Oct 31;317(7167):1185-90.

PMID:
9794851
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
17.

Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?

Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, McQuay HJ.

Control Clin Trials. 1996 Feb;17(1):1-12.

PMID:
8721797
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't.

Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS.

BMJ. 1996 Jan 13;312(7023):71-2. No abstract available.

PMID:
8555924
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
19.

Bias in treatment assignment in controlled clinical trials.

Chalmers TC, Celano P, Sacks HS, Smith H Jr.

N Engl J Med. 1983 Dec 1;309(22):1358-61.

PMID:
6633598
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysis.

Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L'Abbé KA.

J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Mar;45(3):255-65.

PMID:
1569422
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk