Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 16

1.

Primer on statistical interpretation or methods report card on propensity-score matching in the cardiology literature from 2004 to 2006: a systematic review.

Austin PC.

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2008 Sep;1(1):62-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.790634. Review.

PMID:
20031790
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
2.

The performance of different propensity-score methods for estimating relative risks.

Austin PC.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Jun;61(6):537-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.07.011. Epub 2008 Feb 14.

PMID:
18471657
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003.

Austin PC.

Stat Med. 2008 May 30;27(12):2037-49. Review.

PMID:
18038446
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

Propensity-score matching in the cardiovascular surgery literature from 2004 to 2006: a systematic review and suggestions for improvement.

Austin PC.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Nov;134(5):1128-35. Review.

PMID:
17976439
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios.

Austin PC.

Stat Med. 2007 Jul 20;26(16):3078-94.

PMID:
17187347
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Conditioning on the propensity score can result in biased estimation of common measures of treatment effect: a Monte Carlo study.

Austin PC, Grootendorst P, Normand SL, Anderson GM.

Stat Med. 2007 Feb 20;26(4):754-68.

PMID:
16783757
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study.

Austin PC, Grootendorst P, Anderson GM.

Stat Med. 2007 Feb 20;26(4):734-53.

PMID:
16708349
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Missed opportunities in the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction: an assessment of the effects of statin underprescribing on mortality.

Austin PC, Mamdani MM, Juurlink DN, Alter DA, Tu JV.

Am Heart J. 2006 May;151(5):969-75.

PMID:
16644313
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

A review of the application of propensity score methods yielded increasing use, advantages in specific settings, but not substantially different estimates compared with conventional multivariable methods.

Stürmer T, Joshi M, Glynn RJ, Avorn J, Rothman KJ, Schneeweiss S.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 May;59(5):437-47. Epub 2005 Oct 13. Review.

PMID:
16632131
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
11.

A comparison of propensity score methods: a case-study estimating the effectiveness of post-AMI statin use.

Austin PC, Mamdani MM.

Stat Med. 2006 Jun 30;25(12):2084-106.

PMID:
16220490
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Generating survival times to simulate Cox proportional hazards models.

Bender R, Augustin T, Blettner M.

Stat Med. 2005 Jun 15;24(11):1713-23.

PMID:
15724232
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

The use of the propensity score for estimating treatment effects: administrative versus clinical data.

Austin PC, Mamdani MM, Stukel TA, Anderson GM, Tu JV.

Stat Med. 2005 May 30;24(10):1563-78.

PMID:
15706581
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Effects and non-effects of paired identical observations in comparing proportions with binary matched-pairs data.

Agresti A, Min Y.

Stat Med. 2004 Jan 15;23(1):65-75. Review.

PMID:
14695640
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

Effect of statins on risk of coronary disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

LaRosa JC, He J, Vupputuri S.

JAMA. 1999 Dec 22-29;282(24):2340-6.

PMID:
10612322
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

The bias due to incomplete matching.

Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB.

Biometrics. 1985 Mar;41(1):103-16.

PMID:
4005368
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk