Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 18

1.

Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes.

Finley CC, Holden TA, Holden LK, Whiting BR, Chole RA, Neely GJ, Hullar TE, Skinner MW.

Otol Neurotol. 2008 Oct;29(7):920-8. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318184f492.

2.

Implications of deep electrode insertion on cochlear implant fitting.

Gani M, Valentini G, Sigrist A, Kós MI, Boëx C.

J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2007 Mar;8(1):69-83. Epub 2007 Jan 11.

3.

Is word recognition correlated with the number of surviving spiral ganglion cells and electrode insertion depth in human subjects with cochlear implants?

Khan AM, Handzel O, Burgess BJ, Damian D, Eddington DK, Nadol JB Jr.

Laryngoscope. 2005 Apr;115(4):672-7.

PMID:
15805879
4.

Effects of insertion depth of cochlear implant electrodes upon speech perception.

Yukawa K, Cohen L, Blamey P, Pyman B, Tungvachirakul V, O'Leary S.

Audiol Neurootol. 2004 May-Jun;9(3):163-72.

PMID:
15084821
5.

Deep electrode insertion in cochlear implants: apical morphology, electrodes and speech perception results.

Hochmair I, Arnold W, Nopp P, Jolly C, Müller J, Roland P.

Acta Otolaryngol. 2003 Jun;123(5):612-7.

PMID:
12875584
6.

CT-derived estimation of cochlear morphology and electrode array position in relation to word recognition in Nucleus-22 recipients.

Skinner MW, Ketten DR, Holden LK, Harding GW, Smith PG, Gates GA, Neely JG, Kletzker GR, Brunsden B, Blocker B.

J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2002 Sep;3(3):332-50. Epub 2002 Feb 27.

7.

Effects of electrode location on speech recognition with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant.

Friesen LM, Shannon RV, Slattery WH 3rd.

J Am Acad Audiol. 2000 Sep;11(8):418-28.

PMID:
11012237
8.

Hearing results with deep insertion of cochlear implant electrodes.

Hodges AV, Villasuso E, Balkany T, Bird PA, Butts S, Lee D, Gomez O.

Am J Otol. 1999 Jan;20(1):53-5.

PMID:
9918173
9.

In vivo measures of cochlear length and insertion depth of nucleus cochlear implant electrode arrays.

Ketten DR, Skinner MW, Wang G, Vannier MW, Gates GA, Neely JG.

Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1998 Nov;175:1-16.

PMID:
9826942
10.

Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants.

Blamey P, Arndt P, Bergeron F, Bredberg G, Brimacombe J, Facer G, Larky J, Lindström B, Nedzelski J, Peterson A, Shipp D, Staller S, Whitford L.

Audiol Neurootol. 1996 Sep-Oct;1(5):293-306. Review.

PMID:
9390810
11.

Determination of the position of nucleus cochlear implant electrodes in the inner ear.

Skinner MW, Ketten DR, Vannier MW, Gates GA, Yoffie RL, Kalender WA.

Am J Otol. 1994 Sep;15(5):644-51.

PMID:
8572066
12.

Otopathology in a case of multichannel cochlear implantation.

Nadol JB Jr, Ketten DR, Burgess BJ.

Laryngoscope. 1994 Mar;104(3 Pt 1):299-303.

PMID:
8127186
13.

Insertion depth of the Nucleus electrode array and relative performance.

Hartrampf R, Dahm MC, Battmer RD, Gnadeberg D, Strauss-Schier A, Rost U, Lenarz T.

Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1995 Sep;166:277-80. No abstract available.

PMID:
7668668
14.
15.
16.

Factors predicting postoperative sentence scores in postlinguistically deaf adult cochlear implant patients.

Blamey PJ, Pyman BC, Gordon M, Clark GM, Brown AM, Dowell RC, Hollow RD.

Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1992 Apr;101(4):342-8.

PMID:
1562140
17.
18.

Relations among different measures of speech reception in subjects using a cochlear implant.

Rabinowitz WM, Eddington DK, Delhorne LA, Cuneo PA.

J Acoust Soc Am. 1992 Oct;92(4 Pt 1):1869-81.

PMID:
1401531
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk