Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 16

References for PMC Articles for PubMed (Select 20093597)

1.

A limitation of ACRIN DMIST.

Hixson GL Sr, Hendrick RE, Pisano ED, Yaffe MJ, Gatsonis CA.

Radiology. 2008 Aug;248(2):702; author reply 702-3. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2482080235. No abstract available.

PMID:
18641261
2.

Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST.

Pisano ED, Hendrick RE, Yaffe MJ, Baum JK, Acharyya S, Cormack JB, Hanna LA, Conant EF, Fajardo LL, Bassett LW, D'Orsi CJ, Jong RA, Rebner M, Tosteson AN, Gatsonis CA; DMIST Investigators Group.

Radiology. 2008 Feb;246(2):376-83. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2461070200.

3.

Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening.

Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, Yaffe M, Baum JK, Acharyya S, Conant EF, Fajardo LL, Bassett L, D'Orsi C, Jong R, Rebner M; Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial (DMIST) Investigators Group.

N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 27;353(17):1773-83. Epub 2005 Sep 16. Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2006 Oct 26;355(17):1840.

4.

American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial: objectives and methodology.

Pisano ED, Gatsonis CA, Yaffe MJ, Hendrick RE, Tosteson AN, Fryback DG, Bassett LW, Baum JK, Conant EF, Jong RA, Rebner M, D'Orsi CJ.

Radiology. 2005 Aug;236(2):404-12. Epub 2005 Jun 16.

PMID:
15961755
5.

Digital mammography.

Pisano ED, Yaffe MJ.

Radiology. 2005 Feb;234(2):353-62. Review.

PMID:
15670993
6.

Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer.

Lewin JM, D'Orsi CJ, Hendrick RE, Moss LJ, Isaacs PK, Karellas A, Cutter GR.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Sep;179(3):671-7.

PMID:
12185042
7.

Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4,945 paired examinations.

Lewin JM, Hendrick RE, D'Orsi CJ, Isaacs PK, Moss LJ, Karellas A, Sisney GA, Kuni CC, Cutter GR.

Radiology. 2001 Mar;218(3):873-80.

PMID:
11230669
8.

Full breast digital mammography with an amorphous silicon-based flat panel detector: physical characteristics of a clinical prototype.

Vedantham S, Karellas A, Suryanarayanan S, Albagli D, Han S, Tkaczyk EJ, Landberg CE, Opsahl-Ong B, Granfors PR, Levis I, D'Orsi CJ, Hendrick RE.

Med Phys. 2000 Mar;27(3):558-67.

9.

Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: detectors with high voltage protection.

Zhao W, Law J, Waechter D, Huang Z, Rowlands JA.

Med Phys. 1998 Apr;25(4):539-49.

PMID:
9571622
10.

Parametrization of mammography normalized average glandular dose tables.

Sobol WT, Wu X.

Med Phys. 1997 Apr;24(4):547-54.

PMID:
9127307
11.

Composition of mammographic phantom materials.

Geise RA, Palchevsky A.

Radiology. 1996 Feb;198(2):347-50.

PMID:
8596830
12.
13.

Dosage evaluation in mammography.

Stanton L, Villafana T, Day JL, Lightfoot DA.

Radiology. 1984 Feb;150(2):577-84.

PMID:
6691119
14.

Scanned-projection digital mammography.

Nishikawa RM, Mawdsley GE, Fenster A, Yaffe MJ.

Med Phys. 1987 Sep-Oct;14(5):717-27.

PMID:
3683300
15.

X-ray imaging using amorphous selenium: a photoinduced discharge readout method for digital mammography.

Rowlands JA, Hunter DM, Araj N.

Med Phys. 1991 May-Jun;18(3):421-31.

PMID:
1870485
16.
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk