Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 24

1.

Improving the quality of reporting randomized controlled trials in cardiothoracic surgery: the way forward.

Tiruvoipati R, Balasubramanian SP, Atturu G, Peek GJ, Elbourne D.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Aug;132(2):233-40.

PMID:
16872940
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

Determining the reporting quality of RCTs in clinical pharmacology.

Mills E, Loke YK, Wu P, Montori VM, Perri D, Moher D, Guyatt G.

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004 Jul;58(1):61-5. Erratum in: Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004 Jul;58(1):102.

PMID:
15206994
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
3.

Quality of reporting of randomized trials as a measure of methodologic quality.

Huwiler-Müntener K, Jüni P, Junker C, Egger M.

JAMA. 2002 Jun 5;287(21):2801-4.

PMID:
12038917
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials.

Jüni P, Altman DG, Egger M.

BMJ. 2001 Jul 7;323(7303):42-6. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
11440947
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
5.

The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials.

Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG.

Lancet. 2001 Apr 14;357(9263):1191-4.

PMID:
11323066
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before-and-after evaluation.

Moher D, Jones A, Lepage L; CONSORT Group (Consolidated Standards for Reporting of Trials).

JAMA. 2001 Apr 18;285(15):1992-5.

PMID:
11308436
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration.

Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D, Gøtzsche PC, Lang T; CONSORT GROUP (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials).

Ann Intern Med. 2001 Apr 17;134(8):663-94. Review.

PMID:
11304107
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Statistical considerations in the intent-to-treat principle.

Lachin JM.

Control Clin Trials. 2000 Jun;21(3):167-89. Erratum in: Control Clin Trials 2000 Oct;21(5):526.

PMID:
10822117
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Intention to treat analysis is related to methodological quality.

Ruiz-Canela M, Martínez-González MA, de Irala-Estévez J.

BMJ. 2000 Apr 8;320(7240):1007-8. No abstract available.

PMID:
10753165
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
10.

Quality of full and final publications reporting acute stroke trials: a systematic review.

Bath FJ, Owen VE, Bath PM.

Stroke. 1998 Oct;29(10):2203-10.

PMID:
9756604
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
11.
12.

CONSORT: an evolving tool to help improve the quality of reports of randomized controlled trials. Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials.

Moher D.

JAMA. 1998 May 13;279(18):1489-91. No abstract available.

PMID:
9600488
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement.

Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, Horton R, Moher D, Olkin I, Pitkin R, Rennie D, Schulz KF, Simel D, Stroup DF.

JAMA. 1996 Aug 28;276(8):637-9. No abstract available.

PMID:
8773637
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?

Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, McQuay HJ.

Control Clin Trials. 1996 Feb;17(1):1-12.

PMID:
8721797
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

Surgical research or comic opera: questions, but few answers.

Horton R.

Lancet. 1996 Apr 13;347(9007):984-5. No abstract available.

PMID:
8606606
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Blinding and exclusions after allocation in randomised controlled trials: survey of published parallel group trials in obstetrics and gynaecology.

Schulz KF, Grimes DA, Altman DG, Hayes RJ.

BMJ. 1996 Mar 23;312(7033):742-4.

PMID:
8605459
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
17.

Intention to treat--who should use ITT?

Lewis JA, Machin D.

Br J Cancer. 1993 Oct;68(4):647-50. No abstract available.

PMID:
8398686
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
18.

Peer review. Crude and understudied, but indispensable.

Kassirer JP, Campion EW.

JAMA. 1994 Jul 13;272(2):96-7. No abstract available.

PMID:
8015140
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

Assessing the quality of randomization from reports of controlled trials published in obstetrics and gynecology journals.

Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Grimes DA, Altman DG.

JAMA. 1994 Jul 13;272(2):125-8.

PMID:
8015122
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials.

Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG.

JAMA. 1995 Feb 1;273(5):408-12.

PMID:
7823387
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk