Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 40

1.

LUMINANCE DISCRIMINATION OF BRIEF FLASHES UNDER VARIOUS CONDITIONS OF ADAPTATION.

CORNSWEET TN, PINSKER HM.

J Physiol. 1965 Jan;176:294-310. No abstract available.

2.

EVALUATION OF A COMPUTER-RETRIEVED RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE.

MEYERS PH, BECKER HC, SWEENEY JW, NICE CM Jr, NETTLETON WJ Jr.

Radiology. 1963 Aug;81:201-6. No abstract available.

PMID:
14053756
3.

Television contrast expansions of single roentgenograms.

GERSHON-COHEN J, FISHER JF.

Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1959 Feb;81(2):325-7. No abstract available.

PMID:
13617559
4.

Prototype medical image management system (MIMS) at the University of Pennsylvania: software design considerations. 1987.

Seshadri SB, Arenson R, Khalsa S, Brikman I, van der Voorde F.

J Digit Imaging. 2003 Mar;16(1):96-102; discussion 95. No abstract available.

5.

Diagnosis of cardiovascular disease by digital subtraction angiography.

Mistretta CA, Crummy AB.

Science. 1981 Nov 13;214(4522):761-5.

PMID:
7292009
6.

The effect of varying spatial resolution on the detectability of diffuse pulmonary nodules. Assessment with digitized conventional radiographs.

Foley WD, Wilson CR, Keyes GS, DiBianca FA, Scanlon GT, Schleuter D, Lawson TL.

Radiology. 1981 Oct;141(1):25-31.

PMID:
7291538
7.

The influence of ambient and viewbox light upon visual detection of low-contrast targets in a radiograph.

Alter AJ, Kargas GA, Kargas SA, Cameron JR, McDermott JC.

Invest Radiol. 1982 Jul-Aug;17(4):402-6.

PMID:
7129822
8.
9.

Adaptive grey level assignment in CT scan display.

Pizer SM, Zimmerman JB, Staab EV.

J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1984 Apr;8(2):300-5.

PMID:
6707283
10.

Patient exposure requirements for high contrast resolution in digital radiographic systems.

Rimkus D, Baily NA.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1984 Mar;142(3):603-8.

PMID:
6607653
11.

The electro-optical processing of radiographic images.

Kundel HL, Revesz G, Stauffer HM.

Radiol Clin North Am. 1969 Dec;7(3):447-60. No abstract available.

PMID:
5382259
12.

The use of psychophysical principles in the design of a total digital radiology department.

Seeley GW, Newell JD 2nd.

Radiol Clin North Am. 1985 Jun;23(2):341-8.

PMID:
3991891
13.

Nodule detection with and without a chest image.

Kundel HL, Nodine CF, Thickman D, Carmody D, Toto L.

Invest Radiol. 1985 Jan-Feb;20(1):94-9.

PMID:
3980184
14.

Visual perception and image display terminals.

Kundel HL.

Radiol Clin North Am. 1986 Mar;24(1):69-78.

PMID:
3961130
15.

Estimating digital information throughput rates for radiology networks. A model.

Cox GG, Templeton AW, Anderson WH, Cook LT, Hensley KS, Dwyer SJ 3rd.

Invest Radiol. 1986 Feb;21(2):162-6.

PMID:
3957590
16.

Digital and conventional chest imaging: a modified ROC study of observer performance using simulated nodules.

Chakraborty DP, Breatnach ES, Yester MV, Soto B, Barnes GT, Fraser RG.

Radiology. 1986 Jan;158(1):35-9.

PMID:
3940394
17.

Digital and conventional chest images: observer performance with Film Digital Radiography System.

Goodman LR, Foley WD, Wilson CR, Rimm AA, Lawson TL.

Radiology. 1986 Jan;158(1):27-33.

PMID:
3940392
18.

Digital radiography of subtle pulmonary abnormalities: an ROC study of the effect of pixel size on observer performance.

MacMahon H, Vyborny CJ, Metz CE, Doi K, Sabeti V, Solomon SL.

Radiology. 1986 Jan;158(1):21-6.

PMID:
3940383
20.

Digital gastrointestinal imaging: the effect of pixel size on detection of subtle mucosal abnormalities.

Kastan DJ, Ackerman LV, Feczko PJ.

Radiology. 1987 Mar;162(3):853-6.

PMID:
3809504
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk