Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 166

1.

Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ. The BMJ Economic Evaluation Working Party.

Drummond MF, Jefferson TO.

BMJ. 1996 Aug 3;313(7052):275-83. No abstract available.

PMID:
8704542
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
2.

Evaluating the BMJ guidelines for economic submissions: prospective audit of economic submissions to BMJ and The Lancet.

Jefferson T, Smith R, Yee Y, Drummond M, Pratt M, Gale R.

JAMA. 1998 Jul 15;280(3):275-7.

PMID:
9676680
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

Are guidelines for peer-reviewing economic evaluations necessary? A survey of current editorial practice.

Jefferson T, Demicheli V.

Health Econ. 1995 Sep-Oct;4(5):383-8.

PMID:
8563836
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

Assessing quality of economic submissions to the BMJ.

Jefferson T, Demicheli V, Entwistle V.

BMJ. 1995 Aug 5;311(7001):393-4. No abstract available.

PMID:
7640570
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
5.

Qualitative research articles: information for authors and peer reviewers.

Rowan M, Huston P.

CMAJ. 1997 Nov 15;157(10):1442-6. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
9371080
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
6.

[Economic evaluation studies in health].

Rovira-Forns J, Antoñanzas-Villar F.

Med Clin (Barc). 2005 Dec 1;125 Suppl 1:61-71. Spanish.

PMID:
16464430
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Reporting guidelines for economic studies.

Mason J, Drummond M.

Health Econ. 1995 Mar-Apr;4(2):85-94. No abstract available.

PMID:
7613600
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Genetic health technology and economic evaluation: a critical review.

Jarrett J, Mugford M.

Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2006;5(1):27-35. Review.

PMID:
16774290
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Quality of manuscript reviews in nursing research.

Henly SJ, Dougherty MC.

Nurs Outlook. 2009 Jan-Feb;57(1):18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2008.05.006.

PMID:
19150263
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Writing for publication--a guide for new authors.

Dixon N.

Int J Qual Health Care. 2001 Oct;13(5):417-21.

PMID:
11669570
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
11.

Upgrading our instructions for authors.

Schriger DL, Wears RL, Cooper RJ, Callaham ML.

Ann Emerg Med. 2003 Apr;41(4):565-7. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
12658258
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

The Lancet's statistical review process: areas for improvement by authors.

Gore SM, Jones G, Thompson SG.

Lancet. 1992 Jul 11;340(8811):100-2.

PMID:
1351973
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Guide for peer reviewers of scientific articles in the Croatian Medical Journal.

Marusić M, Sambunjak D, Marusić A.

Croat Med J. 2005 Apr;46(2):326-32.

PMID:
15849858
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
14.

What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection.

Gupta P, Kaur G, Sharma B, Shah D, Choudhury P.

Indian Pediatr. 2006 Jun;43(6):479-89. Erratum in: Indian Pediatr. 2006 Aug;43(8):749.

PMID:
16820657
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
15.

The distribution of health care costs and their statistical analysis for economic evaluation.

Briggs A, Gray A.

J Health Serv Res Policy. 1998 Oct;3(4):233-45. Review.

PMID:
10187204
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Publishing in English-language journals.

Davis AJ, Tschudin V.

Nurs Ethics. 2007 May;14(3):425-30.

PMID:
17459824
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Advice on writing an abstract for a scientific meeting and on the evaluation of abstracts by selection committees.

Taboulet P.

Eur J Emerg Med. 2000 Mar;7(1):67-72. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
10839383
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

The expression "proof" is often misused by reviewers and authors.

Versprille A.

Intensive Care Med. 1997 Jan;23(1):131-2. No abstract available.

PMID:
9037659
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

From submission to publication: a retrospective review of the tables and figures in a cohort of randomized controlled trials submitted to the British Medical Journal.

Schriger DL, Sinha R, Schroter S, Liu PY, Altman DG.

Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Dec;48(6):750-6, 756.e1-21. Epub 2006 Sep 15.

PMID:
16978740
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Comments on European Medical Writers Association (EMWA) guidelines on the role of medical writers in developing peer-reviewed publications.

Foote M, Hamilton CW, Mallia-Hughes M.

Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 May;21(5):703-4; author reply 704. No abstract available.

PMID:
15969869
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk