Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 123

1.

Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated.

Thompson SG.

BMJ. 1994 Nov 19;309(6965):1351-5. Review.

PMID:
7866085
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
2.

Controversies in meta-analysis: the case of the trials of serum cholesterol reduction.

Thompson SG.

Stat Methods Med Res. 1993;2(2):173-92. Review.

PMID:
8261257
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

A graphical method for exploring heterogeneity in meta-analyses: application to a meta-analysis of 65 trials.

Baujat B, Mahé C, Pignon JP, Hill C.

Stat Med. 2002 Sep 30;21(18):2641-52.

PMID:
12228882
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

Meta-analyses involving cluster randomization trials: a review of published literature in health care.

Laopaiboon M.

Stat Methods Med Res. 2003 Dec;12(6):515-30. Review.

PMID:
14653354
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

[Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].

Biggeri A, Bellini P, Terracini B; Italian MISA Group.

Epidemiol Prev. 2001 Mar-Apr;25(2 Suppl):1-71. Italian.

PMID:
11515188
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

Methods of meta-analysis: an analysis.

Koretz RL.

Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2002 Sep;5(5):467-74. Review.

PMID:
12172468
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Borrowing strength from external trials in a meta-analysis.

Higgins JP, Whitehead A.

Stat Med. 1996 Dec 30;15(24):2733-49.

PMID:
8981683
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Random effects survival models gave a better understanding of heterogeneity in individual patient data meta-analyses.

Michiels S, Baujat B, Mahé C, Sargent DJ, Pignon JP.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Mar;58(3):238-45.

PMID:
15718112
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Heterogeneity and statistical significance in meta-analysis: an empirical study of 125 meta-analyses.

Engels EA, Schmid CH, Terrin N, Olkin I, Lau J.

Stat Med. 2000 Jul 15;19(13):1707-28. Review.

PMID:
10861773
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods.

Thompson SG, Sharp SJ.

Stat Med. 1999 Oct 30;18(20):2693-708.

PMID:
10521860
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Assessing the reporting and scientific quality of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of treatments for anxiety disorders.

Bereza BG, Machado M, Einarson TR.

Ann Pharmacother. 2008 Oct;42(10):1402-9. doi: 10.1345/aph.1L204. Epub 2008 Sep 2.

PMID:
18728102
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Statistical heterogeneity in systematic reviews of clinical trials: a critical appraisal of guidelines and practice.

Higgins J, Thompson S, Deeks J, Altman D.

J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002 Jan;7(1):51-61. Review.

PMID:
11822262
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

[Meta-analysis as a tool for evaluation of evidence].

Koch A, Ziegler S.

Med Klin (Munich). 2000 Feb 15;95(2):109-16. Review. German.

PMID:
10714131
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Detecting and describing heterogeneity in meta-analysis.

Hardy RJ, Thompson SG.

Stat Med. 1998 Apr 30;17(8):841-56.

PMID:
9595615
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.
16.

Quantitative synthesis in systematic reviews.

Lau J, Ioannidis JP, Schmid CH.

Ann Intern Med. 1997 Nov 1;127(9):820-6.

PMID:
9382404
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Meta-analyses of clinical drug trials--gold standard reviews or statistical alchemy?

Chan ES.

Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2000 Sep;29(5):610-5.

PMID:
11126696
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials: the need for complete data.

Clarke MJ, Stewart LA.

J Eval Clin Pract. 1995 Nov;1(2):119-26. Review.

PMID:
9238566
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.
20.

Issues in subgroup analyses and meta-analyses of clinical trials.

Bigger JT.

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003 Sep;14(9 Suppl):S6-8.

PMID:
12950510
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk