Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 174

1.

The physician factor in cesarean birth rates.

Goyert GL, Bottoms SF, Treadwell MC, Nehra PC.

N Engl J Med. 1989 Mar 16;320(11):706-9.

PMID:
2922015
2.
3.

The Green Bay cesarean section study. I. The physician factor as a determinant of cesarean birth rates.

DeMott RK, Sandmire HF.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Jun;162(6):1593-9; discussion 1599-602.

PMID:
2360593
4.

Cesarean section rates in low-risk private patients managed by certified nurse-midwives and obstetricians.

Davis LG, Riedmann GL, Sapiro M, Minogue JP, Kazer RR.

J Nurse Midwifery. 1994 Mar-Apr;39(2):91-7.

PMID:
8027851
5.

Practice variations between family physicians and obstetricians in the management of low-risk pregnancies.

Hueston WJ, Applegate JA, Mansfield CJ, King DE, McClaflin RR.

J Fam Pract. 1995 Apr;40(4):345-51.

PMID:
7699347
6.

A successful program to lower cesarean-section rates.

Myers SA, Gleicher N.

N Engl J Med. 1988 Dec 8;319(23):1511-6.

PMID:
3185675
7.

The Israel perinatal census.

Mor-Yosef S, Samueloff A, Schenker JG.

Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992 Jun;18(2):139-45.

PMID:
1503538
8.

Socioeconomic differences in rates of cesarean section.

Gould JB, Davey B, Stafford RS.

N Engl J Med. 1989 Jul 27;321(4):233-9.

PMID:
2747759
9.

Physician cesarean delivery rates and risk-adjusted perinatal outcomes.

Li T, Rhoads GG, Smulian J, Demissie K, Wartenberg D, Kruse L.

Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jun;101(6):1204-12.

PMID:
12798526
10.

Indications for cesarean section in singleton pregnancies in two Danish counties with different cesarean section rates.

Sperling LS, Henriksen TB, Ulrichsen H, Hedegård M, Møller H, Hansen V, Ovlisen B, Secher NJ.

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1994 Feb;73(2):129-35.

PMID:
8116351
11.

Cesarean section in twin pregnancies in two Danish counties with different cesarean section rates.

Henriksen TB, Sperling L, Hedegaard M, Ulrichsen H, Ovlisen B, Secher NJ.

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1994 Feb;73(2):123-8.

PMID:
8116350
12.

The effect of physician characteristics on clinical behavior: cesarean section in New York State.

Tussing AD, Wojtowycz MA.

Soc Sci Med. 1993 Nov;37(10):1251-60.

PMID:
8272903
13.

Variations in the use of cesarean delivery for dystocia: lessons about the source of care.

McCloskey L, Petitti DB, Hobel CJ.

Med Care. 1992 Feb;30(2):126-35.

PMID:
1736018
14.

Reducing the cesarean section rate in a rural community hospital.

Iglesias S, Burn R, Saunders LD.

CMAJ. 1991 Dec 1;145(11):1459-64. Erratum in: Can Med Assoc J 1992 May 15;146(10):1701.

15.

Changes in maternal characteristics and obstetric practice and recent increases in primary cesarean delivery.

Joseph KS, Young DC, Dodds L, O'Connell CM, Allen VM, Chandra S, Allen AC.

Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Oct;102(4):791-800.

PMID:
14551010
16.

Clinical practice guideline for cesarean section due to cephalopelvic disproportion.

Chittiphavorn S, Pinjaroen S, Suwanrath C, Soonthornpun K.

J Med Assoc Thai. 2006 Jun;89(6):735-40.

PMID:
16850670
17.

Relation of private or clinic care to the cesarean birth rate.

de Regt RH, Minkoff HL, Feldman J, Schwarz RH.

N Engl J Med. 1986 Sep 4;315(10):619-24.

PMID:
3736601
18.
19.

The effect of physician factors on the cesarean section decision.

Burns LR, Geller SE, Wholey DR.

Med Care. 1995 Apr;33(4):365-82. Review.

PMID:
7731278
20.

The influence of the obstetrician in the relationship between epidural analgesia and cesarean section for dystocia.

Segal S, Blatman R, Doble M, Datta S.

Anesthesiology. 1999 Jul;91(1):90-6.

PMID:
10422933
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk