Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 98

1.

Elective single embryo transfer trends and predictors of a good perinatal outcome--United States, 1999 to 2010.

Steinberg ML, Boulet S, Kissin D, Warner L, Jamieson DJ.

Fertil Steril. 2013 Jun;99(7):1937-43. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.01.134. Epub 2013 Feb 26.

2.

Trends and outcomes for donor oocyte cycles in the United States, 2000-2010.

Kawwass JF, Monsour M, Crawford S, Kissin DM, Session DR, Kulkarni AD, Jamieson DJ; National ART Surveillance System (NASS) Group.

JAMA. 2013 Dec 11;310(22):2426-34. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.280924.

3.

Is cryopreservation of embryos a legitimate surrogate marker of embryo quality in studies of assisted reproductive technology conducted using national databases?

Stern JE, Lieberman ES, Macaluso M, Racowsky C.

Fertil Steril. 2012 Apr;97(4):890-3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.12.050. Epub 2012 Jan 20.

PMID:
22265032
4.

Impact of single embryo transfer policy on perinatal outcomes in fresh and frozen cycles-analysis of the Japanese Assisted Reproduction Technology registry between 2007 and 2012.

Takeshima K, Jwa SC, Saito H, Nakaza A, Kuwahara A, Ishihara O, Irahara M, Hirahara F, Yoshimura Y, Sakumoto T.

Fertil Steril. 2016 Feb;105(2):337-46.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.10.002. Epub 2015 Oct 27.

PMID:
26518122
5.

Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance — United States, 2012.

Sunderam S, Kissin DM, Crawford SB, Folger SG, Jamieson DJ, Warner L, Barfield WD; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015 Aug 14;64(6):1-29.

6.

Costs of achieving live birth from assisted reproductive technology: a comparison of sequential single and double embryo transfer approaches.

Crawford S, Boulet SL, Mneimneh AS, Perkins KM, Jamieson DJ, Zhang Y, Kissin DM.

Fertil Steril. 2016 Feb;105(2):444-50. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.10.032. Epub 2015 Nov 19.

PMID:
26604068
7.

Endometriosis and assisted reproductive technology: United States trends and outcomes 2000-2011.

Kawwass JF, Crawford S, Session DR, Kissin DM, Jamieson DJ; National ART Surveillance System Group.

Fertil Steril. 2015 Jun;103(6):1537-43. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.003. Epub 2015 Apr 14.

PMID:
25881877
8.

Number of embryos transferred after in vitro fertilization and good perinatal outcome.

Kissin DM, Kulkarni AD, Kushnir VA, Jamieson DJ; National ART Surveillance System Group.

Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Feb;123(2 Pt 1):239-47. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000106.

9.

Comparison of live-birth defects after luteal-phase ovarian stimulation vs. conventional ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization and vitrified embryo transfer cycles.

Chen H, Wang Y, Lyu Q, Ai A, Fu Y, Tian H, Cai R, Hong Q, Chen Q, Shoham Z, Kuang Y.

Fertil Steril. 2015 May;103(5):1194-1201.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.02.020. Epub 2015 Mar 23.

PMID:
25813280
10.

Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2011.

Sunderam S, Kissin DM, Crawford SB, Folger SG, Jamieson DJ, Barfield WD; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

MMWR Surveill Summ. 2014 Nov 21;63(10):1-28.

11.

Guidelines for the number of embryos to transfer following in vitro fertilization No. 182, September 2006.

JOINT SOGC-CFAS.

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008 Aug;102(2):203-16. Review.

PMID:
18773532
12.

Trends and correlates of good perinatal outcomes in assisted reproductive technology.

Joshi N, Kissin D, Anderson JE, Session D, Macaluso M, Jamieson DJ.

Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Oct;120(4):843-51.

13.

Elective cryopreservation of all embryos with subsequent cryothaw embryo transfer in patients at risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome reduces the risk of adverse obstetric outcomes: a preliminary study.

Imudia AN, Awonuga AO, Kaimal AJ, Wright DL, Styer AK, Toth TL.

Fertil Steril. 2013 Jan;99(1):168-73. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.08.060. Epub 2012 Sep 29.

PMID:
23025881
14.

The association between embryo quality and perinatal outcome of singletons born after single embryo transfers: a pilot study.

Oron G, Son WY, Buckett W, Tulandi T, Holzer H.

Hum Reprod. 2014 Jul;29(7):1444-51. Epub 2014 May 8.

15.

Practice patterns and outcomes with the use of single embryo transfer in the United States.

Luke B, Brown MB, Grainger DA, Cedars M, Klein N, Stern JE; Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Writing Group.

Fertil Steril. 2010 Feb;93(2):490-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.02.077. Epub 2009 Apr 18.

PMID:
19376512
16.

In vitro fertilization and multiple pregnancies: an evidence-based analysis.

Health Quality Ontario.

Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006;6(18):1-63. Epub 2006 Oct 1.

17.

Clinical factors associated with live birth after single embryo transfer.

Kresowik JD, Sparks AE, Van Voorhis BJ.

Fertil Steril. 2012 Nov;98(5):1152-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.07.1141. Epub 2012 Sep 6.

PMID:
22959461
18.

Assisted reproductive technology surveillance -- United States, 2010.

Sunderam S, Kissin DM, Crawford S, Anderson JE, Folger SG, Jamieson DJ, Barfield WD; Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC.

MMWR Surveill Summ. 2013 Dec 6;62(9):1-24.

19.

Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of frozen thawed versus fresh embryos generated through in vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Maheshwari A, Pandey S, Shetty A, Hamilton M, Bhattacharya S.

Fertil Steril. 2012 Aug;98(2):368-77.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.019. Epub 2012 Jun 13. Review.

PMID:
22698643
20.

Using the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome System morphological measures to predict live birth after assisted reproductive technology.

Luke B, Brown MB, Stern JE, Jindal SK, Racowsky C, Ball GD.

Fertil Steril. 2014 Nov;102(5):1338-44. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.1242. Epub 2014 Sep 11.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk