Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 212

1.

Genome-wide detection of single-nucleotide and copy-number variations of a single human cell.

Zong C, Lu S, Chapman AR, Xie XS.

Science. 2012 Dec 21;338(6114):1622-6. doi: 10.1126/science.1229164.

2.

A single cell level based method for copy number variation analysis by low coverage massively parallel sequencing.

Zhang C, Zhang C, Chen S, Yin X, Pan X, Lin G, Tan Y, Tan K, Xu Z, Hu P, Li X, Chen F, Xu X, Li Y, Zhang X, Jiang H, Wang W.

PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54236. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054236. Epub 2013 Jan 23.

3.

Microfluidic whole genome amplification device for single cell sequencing.

Yu Z, Lu S, Huang Y.

Anal Chem. 2014 Oct 7;86(19):9386-90. doi: 10.1021/ac5032176. Epub 2014 Sep 22.

PMID:
25233049
4.

Comparison of multiple displacement amplification (MDA) and multiple annealing and looping-based amplification cycles (MALBAC) in single-cell sequencing.

Chen M, Song P, Zou D, Hu X, Zhao S, Gao S, Ling F.

PLoS One. 2014 Dec 8;9(12):e114520. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114520. eCollection 2014. Erratum in: PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0124990.

5.

Uniform and accurate single-cell sequencing based on emulsion whole-genome amplification.

Fu Y, Li C, Lu S, Zhou W, Tang F, Xie XS, Huang Y.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Sep 22;112(38):11923-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1513988112. Epub 2015 Sep 4.

6.

A quantitative comparison of single-cell whole genome amplification methods.

de Bourcy CF, De Vlaminck I, Kanbar JN, Wang J, Gawad C, Quake SR.

PLoS One. 2014 Aug 19;9(8):e105585. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105585. eCollection 2014.

7.

Whole genome amplification with SurePlex results in better copy number alteration detection using sequencing data compared to the MALBAC method.

Deleye L, De Coninck D, Christodoulou C, Sante T, Dheedene A, Heindryckx B, Van den Abbeel E, De Sutter P, Menten B, Deforce D, Van Nieuwerburgh F.

Sci Rep. 2015 Jun 30;5:11711. doi: 10.1038/srep11711.

8.

Comparison of variations detection between whole-genome amplification methods used in single-cell resequencing.

Hou Y, Wu K, Shi X, Li F, Song L, Wu H, Dean M, Li G, Tsang S, Jiang R, Zhang X, Li B, Liu G, Bedekar N, Lu N, Xie G, Liang H, Chang L, Wang T, Chen J, Li Y, Zhang X, Yang H, Xu X, Wang L, Wang J.

Gigascience. 2015 Aug 6;4:37. doi: 10.1186/s13742-015-0068-3. eCollection 2015.

9.

Mate pair sequencing of whole-genome-amplified DNA following laser capture microdissection of prostate cancer.

Murphy SJ, Cheville JC, Zarei S, Johnson SH, Sikkink RA, Kosari F, Feldman AL, Eckloff BW, Karnes RJ, Vasmatzis G.

DNA Res. 2012 Oct;19(5):395-406. doi: 10.1093/dnares/dss021. Epub 2012 Sep 18.

10.

Single-cell paired-end genome sequencing reveals structural variation per cell cycle.

Voet T, Kumar P, Van Loo P, Cooke SL, Marshall J, Lin ML, Zamani Esteki M, Van der Aa N, Mateiu L, McBride DJ, Bignell GR, McLaren S, Teague J, Butler A, Raine K, Stebbings LA, Quail MA, D'Hooghe T, Moreau Y, Futreal PA, Stratton MR, Vermeesch JR, Campbell PJ.

Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jul;41(12):6119-38. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt345. Epub 2013 Apr 29.

11.

Quantitative assessment of single-cell whole genome amplification methods for detecting copy number variation using hippocampal neurons.

Ning L, Li Z, Wang G, Hu W, Hou Q, Tong Y, Zhang M, Chen Y, Qin L, Chen X, Man HY, Liu P, He J.

Sci Rep. 2015 Jun 19;5:11415. doi: 10.1038/srep11415.

12.

Single-Cell Whole-Genome Amplification and Sequencing: Methodology and Applications.

Huang L, Ma F, Chapman A, Lu S, Xie XS.

Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2015;16:79-102. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-090413-025352. Epub 2015 Jun 11. Review.

PMID:
26077818
13.

The Performance of Whole Genome Amplification Methods and Next-Generation Sequencing for Pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis of Chromosomal Abnormalities.

Li N, Wang L, Wang H, Ma M, Wang X, Li Y, Zhang W, Zhang J, Cram DS, Yao Y.

J Genet Genomics. 2015 Apr 20;42(4):151-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2015.03.001. Epub 2015 Mar 14.

PMID:
25953353
14.

Evaluation of affinity-based genome-wide DNA methylation data: effects of CpG density, amplification bias, and copy number variation.

Robinson MD, Stirzaker C, Statham AL, Coolen MW, Song JZ, Nair SS, Strbenac D, Speed TP, Clark SJ.

Genome Res. 2010 Dec;20(12):1719-29. doi: 10.1101/gr.110601.110. Epub 2010 Nov 2. Erratum in: Genome Res. 2011 Jan;21(1):146.

15.

A new workflow for whole-genome sequencing of single human cells.

Binder V, Bartenhagen C, Okpanyi V, Gombert M, Moehlendick B, Behrens B, Klein HU, Rieder H, Ida Krell PF, Dugas M, Stoecklein NH, Borkhardt A.

Hum Mutat. 2014 Oct;35(10):1260-70. doi: 10.1002/humu.22625. Epub 2014 Aug 18.

PMID:
25066732
16.

Copy Number Variation detection from 1000 Genomes Project exon capture sequencing data.

Wu J, Grzeda KR, Stewart C, Grubert F, Urban AE, Snyder MP, Marth GT.

BMC Bioinformatics. 2012 Nov 17;13:305. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-305.

17.

Characterization of whole genome amplified (WGA) DNA for use in genotyping assay development.

Han T, Chang CW, Kwekel JC, Chen Y, Ge Y, Martinez-Murillo F, Roscoe D, Težak Z, Philip R, Bijwaard K, Fuscoe JC.

BMC Genomics. 2012 Jun 1;13:217. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-217.

18.

Whole-genome haplotyping by dilution, amplification, and sequencing.

Kaper F, Swamy S, Klotzle B, Munchel S, Cottrell J, Bibikova M, Chuang HY, Kruglyak S, Ronaghi M, Eberle MA, Fan JB.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Apr 2;110(14):5552-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1218696110. Epub 2013 Mar 18.

19.

Genome analyses of single human oocytes.

Hou Y, Fan W, Yan L, Li R, Lian Y, Huang J, Li J, Xu L, Tang F, Xie XS, Qiao J.

Cell. 2013 Dec 19;155(7):1492-506. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.11.040.

20.

Deep sequencing in cancer research.

Yoshida K, Sanada M, Ogawa S.

Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2013 Feb;43(2):110-5. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hys206. Epub 2012 Dec 5. Review.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk