Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 126

Related Citations for PubMed (Select 23154391)

1.

A double-blinded randomized controlled trial of laparoendoscopic single-site access versus conventional 3-port appendectomy.

Teoh AY, Chiu PW, Wong TC, Poon MC, Wong SK, Leong HT, Lai PB, Ng EK.

Ann Surg. 2012 Dec;256(6):909-14. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182765fcf.

PMID:
23154391
2.

Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized controlled study.

Lee WS, Choi ST, Lee JN, Kim KK, Park YH, Lee WK, Baek JH, Lee TH.

Ann Surg. 2013 Feb;257(2):214-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318273bde4.

PMID:
23241869
3.

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study.

Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Towfigh S, Gevorgyan A, Essani R.

Ann Surg. 2005 Sep;242(3):439-48; discussion 448-50.

4.

A prospective, randomized controlled trial of single-incision laparoscopic vs conventional 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy for treatment of acute appendicitis.

Carter JT, Kaplan JA, Nguyen JN, Lin MY, Rogers SJ, Harris HW.

J Am Coll Surg. 2014 May;218(5):950-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.12.052. Epub 2014 Feb 19.

PMID:
24684867
5.

Comparative study between single-incision and three-port laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial.

Kye BH, Lee J, Kim W, Kim D, Lee D.

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013 May;23(5):431-6. doi: 10.1089/lap.2012.0284. Epub 2013 Mar 8.

PMID:
23473061
6.

Comparative study on surgical outcomes and operative costs of transumbilical single-port laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy in adult patients.

Lee YS, Kim JH, Moon EJ, Kim JJ, Lee KH, Oh SJ, Park SM, Hong TH.

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009 Dec;19(6):493-6. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181c15493.

PMID:
20027094
7.

Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery appendectomy.

Vidal O, Valentini M, Ginestà C, Martí J, Espert JJ, Benarroch G, García-Valdecasas JC.

Surg Endosc. 2010 Mar;24(3):686-91. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0661-6. Epub 2009 Aug 19.

PMID:
19690912
8.

Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy. Prospective randomized study of outcomes.

Minné L, Varner D, Burnell A, Ratzer E, Clark J, Haun W.

Arch Surg. 1997 Jul;132(7):708-11; discussion 712.

PMID:
9230853
9.

Comparison of needlescopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Lau DH, Yau KK, Chung CC, Leung FC, Tai YP, Li MK.

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2005 Apr;15(2):75-9.

PMID:
15821618
10.

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: what is the real difference? Results of a prospective randomized double-blinded trial.

Ignacio RC, Burke R, Spencer D, Bissell C, Dorsainvil C, Lucha PA.

Surg Endosc. 2004 Feb;18(2):334-7. Epub 2003 Dec 29.

PMID:
14691696
11.

Single incision versus standard 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial.

St Peter SD, Adibe OO, Juang D, Sharp SW, Garey CL, Laituri CA, Murphy JP, Andrews WS, Sharp RJ, Snyder CL, Holcomb GW 3rd, Ostlie DJ.

Ann Surg. 2011 Oct;254(4):586-90. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31823003b5.

PMID:
21946218
12.

A case-controlled comparison of single-site access versus conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy.

Teoh AY, Chiu PW, Wong TC, Wong SK, Lai PB, Ng EK.

Surg Endosc. 2011 May;25(5):1415-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1406-2. Epub 2010 Oct 23.

PMID:
20972583
13.

[Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients with chronic appendicitis].

Xu FF, Xiao LB, Wu WH, Zhang XW, Long S, Tan JF, Tan M.

Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2007 Jul;10(4):359-61. Chinese.

PMID:
17659463
14.

Single-incision multiport laparoscopy does not cause more pain than conventional laparoscopy: a prospective evaluation in children undergoing appendectomy.

Mayer S, Werner A, Wachowiak R, Buehligen U, Boehm R, Geyer C, Till H.

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011 Oct;21(8):753-6. doi: 10.1089/lap.2011.0131. Epub 2011 Jul 21.

PMID:
21777062
15.

Efficacy of laparoscopy in complicated appendicitis.

Garg CP, Vaidya BB, Chengalath MM.

Int J Surg. 2009 Jun;7(3):250-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.04.007. Epub 2009 Apr 23.

16.

Prospective nonrandomized study of conventional versus laparoscopic appendectomy.

Reiertsen O, Trondsen E, Bakka A, Andersen OK, Larsen S, Rosseland AR.

World J Surg. 1994 May-Jun;18(3):411-5; discussion 415-6.

PMID:
8091783
17.

Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) versus classic video-laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized prospective study.

Aprea G, Coppola Bottazzi E, Guida F, Masone S, Persico G.

J Surg Res. 2011 Apr;166(2):e109-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.11.885. Epub 2010 Dec 22.

PMID:
21227454
18.

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy; which method to choose? A prospective randomized comparison.

Kargar S, Mirshamsi MH, Zare M, Arefanian S, Shadman Yazdi E, Aref A.

Acta Med Iran. 2011;49(6):352-6.

20.

Single port/incision laparoscopic surgery compared with standard three-port laparoscopic surgery for appendicectomy - a randomised controlled trial.

Malik M, McCormack K, Krukowski ZH, McDonald A, McPherson G, Cook JA, Ahmed I; SCARLESS Study Group.

Trials. 2012 Oct 30;13:201. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-201.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk