Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 107

1.

Trends in the treatment of adults with ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

Jacobs BL, Kaufman SR, Morgenstern H, Hollenbeck BK, Wolf JS Jr, Hollingsworth JM.

J Endourol. 2013 Mar;27(3):355-60. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0017. Epub 2012 Nov 7.

PMID:
22967009
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
2.

National trends and disparities in the use of minimally invasive adult pyeloplasty.

Sukumar S, Sun M, Karakiewicz PI, Friedman AA, Chun FK, Sammon J, Ghani KR, Ravi P, Bianchi M, Jeong W, Shariat SF, Hansen J, Peabody JO, Elder JS, Menon M, Trinh QD.

J Urol. 2012 Sep;188(3):913-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.05.013. Epub 2012 Jul 20.

PMID:
22819404
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

Comparison of open and endourologic approaches to the obstructed ureteropelvic junction.

Brooks JD, Kavoussi LR, Preminger GM, Schuessler WW, Moore RG.

Urology. 1995 Dec;46(6):791-5.

PMID:
7502417
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

Minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a critical analysis of results.

Eden CG.

Eur Urol. 2007 Oct;52(4):983-9. Epub 2007 Jul 6. Review.

PMID:
17629395
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.
6.

Endopyelotomy for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction: risk factors determine the success rate.

Danuser H, Ackermann DK, Böhlen D, Studer UE.

J Urol. 1998 Jan;159(1):56-61.

PMID:
9400436
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

The minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a review of our experience during the last decade.

Yanke BV, Lallas CD, Pagnani C, McGinnis DE, Bagley DH.

J Urol. 2008 Oct;180(4):1397-402. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.06.020. Epub 2008 Aug 15.

PMID:
18707717
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Long-term success of antegrade endopyelotomy compared with pyeloplasty at a single institution.

Dimarco DS, Gettman MT, McGee SM, Chow GK, Leroy AJ, Slezak J, Patterson DE, Segura JW.

J Endourol. 2006 Oct;20(10):707-12.

PMID:
17094743
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

Sundaram CP, Grubb RL 3rd, Rehman J, Yan Y, Chen C, Landman J, McDougall EM, Clayman RV.

J Urol. 2003 Jun;169(6):2037-40.

PMID:
12771713
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Practice trends in contemporary management of adult ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

Marcovich R, Jacobson AI, Aldana JP, Lee BR, Smith AD.

Urology. 2003 Jul;62(1):22-5; discussion 25-6.

PMID:
12837413
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Minimally invasive surgical management of pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction: update on the current status of robotic-assisted pyeloplasty.

Uberoi J, Disick GI, Munver R.

BJU Int. 2009 Dec;104(11):1722-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08682.x. Epub 2009 Jun 10. Review.

PMID:
19519760
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: long-term experience with an algorithm for laser endopyelotomy and laparoscopic retroperitoneal pyeloplasty.

Rassweiler JJ, Subotic S, Feist-Schwenk M, Sugiono M, Schulze M, Teber D, Frede T.

J Urol. 2007 Mar;177(3):1000-5.

PMID:
17296396
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Emerging trends in robotic pyeloplasty for the management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults.

Monn MF, Bahler CD, Schneider EB, Sundaram CP.

J Urol. 2013 Apr;189(4):1352-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.001. Epub 2012 Oct 9.

PMID:
23063631
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Comparison of open and laparoscopic pyeloplasty in ureteropelvic junction obstruction surgery: report of 49 cases.

Umari P, Lissiani A, Trombetta C, Belgrano E.

Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2011 Dec;83(4):169-74.

PMID:
22670313
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

Is antegrade endopyelotomy really less invasive than open pyeloplasty?

Dobry E, Usai P, Studer UE, Danuser H.

Urol Int. 2007;79(2):152-6.

PMID:
17851286
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Population-based comparison of laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in paediatric pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction.

Knoedler J, Han L, Granberg C, Kramer S, Chow G, Gettman M, Kimball B, Moriarty J, Kim S, Husmann D.

BJU Int. 2013 Jun;111(7):1141-7. doi: 10.1111/bju.12039. Epub 2013 Mar 19.

PMID:
23510261
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

Wyler SF, Bachmann A, Casella R, Gasser T, Sulser T.

J Endourol. 2004 Dec;18(10):948-51.

PMID:
15801360
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Pediatric endopyelotomy: the Washington University experience.

Figenshau RS, Clayman RV, Colberg JW, Coplen DE, Soble JJ, Manley CB.

J Urol. 1996 Dec;156(6):2025-30.

PMID:
8911382
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

Single-center comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty, Acucise endopyelotomy, and open pyeloplasty.

Baldwin DD, Dunbar JA, Wells N, McDougall EM.

J Endourol. 2003 Apr;17(3):155-60.

PMID:
12803987
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Endopyeloplasty versus endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

Desai MM, Desai MR, Gill IS.

Urology. 2004 Jul;64(1):16-21; discussion 21.

PMID:
15245924
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk