Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 84

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 22596932)

1.

Commentary: thoughts on assessing evidence for gene by environment interaction.

Weinberg CR.

Int J Epidemiol. 2012 Jun;41(3):705-7. doi: 10.1093/ije/dys048. Epub 2012 May 16. No abstract available.

2.

Commentary: study of gene-environment interplay--a lesson in how to keep oneself busy for the foreseeable future.

Viding E.

J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2013 Oct;54(10):1144-6. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12129.

PMID:
24007417
3.

Comparative research design: a guide for the clinical nurse specialist.

Siedlecki SL.

Clin Nurse Spec. 2013 Mar-Apr;27(2):63-6. doi: 10.1097/NUR.0b013e3182819189. No abstract available.

PMID:
23392061
4.

The development of evidence-based guidelines in dentistry.

Faggion CM Jr.

J Dent Educ. 2013 Feb;77(2):124-36.

5.

Analysis of epidemiologic studies of genetic effects and gene-environment interactions.

GarcĂ­a-Closas M, Jacobs K, Kraft P, Chatterjee N.

IARC Sci Publ. 2011;(163):281-301. Review.

PMID:
22997868
6.

Methodology for the MASCC/ISOO Mucositis Clinical Practice Guidelines Update.

Bowen JM, Elad S, Hutchins RD, Lalla RV; Mucositis Study Group of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society of Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO).

Support Care Cancer. 2013 Jan;21(1):303-8. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1592-7. Epub 2012 Sep 9.

PMID:
22960942
7.

Commentary: Francis Galton, twins and intelligence.

Gillham NW.

Int J Epidemiol. 2012 Aug;41(4):920-2. doi: 10.1093/ije/dys098. No abstract available.

8.

Commentary: The birth of the twin study--a commentary on Francis Galton's 'The history of twins'.

Waller JC.

Int J Epidemiol. 2012 Aug;41(4):913-7. doi: 10.1093/ije/dys100. No abstract available.

9.

Commentary: Francis Galton and the twin method.

Bulmer M.

Int J Epidemiol. 2012 Aug;41(4):911-3. doi: 10.1093/ije/dys096. No abstract available.

10.

Tumours: Less lactation may explain cancer rise.

Oudesluys-Murphy AM.

Nature. 2012 Jun 27;486(7404):473. doi: 10.1038/486473c. No abstract available.

PMID:
22739302
11.

Commentary: reporting and assessing evidence for interaction: why, when and how?

Clayton D.

Int J Epidemiol. 2012 Jun;41(3):707-10. doi: 10.1093/ije/dys069. Epub 2012 May 16. No abstract available.

12.

Recommendations and proposed guidelines for assessing the cumulative evidence on joint effects of genes and environments on cancer occurrence in humans.

Boffetta P, Winn DM, Ioannidis JP, Thomas DC, Little J, Smith GD, Cogliano VJ, Hecht SS, Seminara D, Vineis P, Khoury MJ.

Int J Epidemiol. 2012 Jun;41(3):686-704. doi: 10.1093/ije/dys010. Epub 2012 May 16.

13.

[Genetics, gene-environment-interactions and epigenetics in the development of depressive disorders].

Klein AM, Glaesmer H.

Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2012 Mar-Apr;62(3-4):95-101. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1306320. Epub 2012 Apr 2. Review. German.

PMID:
22473427
14.

Mobile genetic elements and cancer. From mutations to gene therapy.

Kozeretska IA, Demydov SV, Ostapchenko LI.

Exp Oncol. 2011 Dec;33(4):198-205. Review.

PMID:
22217707
15.

[Practice-based research can result in research-based practice. The gap between research results and care benefits].

Nilsen P.

Lakartidningen. 2011 Sep 7-13;108(36):1672-3. Swedish. No abstract available.

PMID:
22032008
16.

Bias in the case-only design applied to studies of gene-environment and gene-gene interaction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Dennis J, Hawken S, Krewski D, Birkett N, Gheorghe M, Frei J, McKeown-Eyssen G, Little J.

Int J Epidemiol. 2011 Oct;40(5):1329-41. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyr088. Epub 2011 Jul 4. Review.

17.

Data withdrawal in randomized controlled trials: Defining the problem and proposing solutions: a commentary.

Ye C, Giangregorio L, Holbrook A, Pullenayegum E, Goldsmith CH, Thabane L.

Contemp Clin Trials. 2011 May;32(3):318-22. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2011.01.016. Epub 2011 Feb 4. Review.

PMID:
21300179
18.

A commentary on the complexity of tinnitus management: clinical guidelines provide a path through the fog.

Searchfield G.

Eval Health Prof. 2011 Dec;34(4):421-8. doi: 10.1177/0163278710392983. Epub 2011 Jan 10.

PMID:
21224266
19.

Critical appraisal guidelines for assessing the quality and impact of user involvement in research.

Wright D, Foster C, Amir Z, Elliott J, Wilson R.

Health Expect. 2010 Dec;13(4):359-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00607.x.

PMID:
20629767
20.

In defense of valid design as a policy rule.

Evans EL.

Am J Bioeth. 2010 Jun;10(6):18-9. doi: 10.1080/15265161003686522. No abstract available.

PMID:
20526962
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk