Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 94

1.

Considerations in the construction of an instrument to assess attitudes regarding critical illness gene variation research.

Freeman BD, Kennedy CR, Bolcic-Jankovic D, Eastman A, Iverson E, Shehane E, Celious A, Barillas J, Clarridge B.

J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2012 Feb;7(1):58-70. doi: 10.1525/jer.2012.7.1.58.

2.

Attitudes of legal guardians in the ICU - a qualitative report.

Kuniavsky M, van Heerden PV, Kadmon I, Dekeyser Ganz F, Linton DM, Sviri S.

Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2014 Apr;30(2):86-92. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2013.10.002. Epub 2013 Nov 7.

PMID:
24211049
3.

Are physicians' recommendations to limit life support beneficial or burdensome? Bringing empirical data to the debate.

White DB, Evans LR, Bautista CA, Luce JM, Lo B.

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009 Aug 15;180(4):320-5. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200811-1776OC. Epub 2009 Jun 4.

4.

Exploring determinants of surrogate decision-maker confidence: an example from the ICU.

Bolcic-Jankovic D, Clarridge BR, LeBlanc JL, Mahmood RS, Roman AM, Freeman BD.

J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2014 Oct;9(4):76-85. doi: 10.1177/1556264614545036. Epub 2014 Aug 7.

PMID:
25747298
5.

Perspectives of surrogate decision makers for critically ill patients regarding gene variation research.

Iverson E, Celious A, Kennedy CR, Shehane E, Eastman A, Warren V, Freeman BD.

Genet Med. 2013 May;15(5):368-73. doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.142. Epub 2012 Nov 15.

PMID:
23154525
6.

Surrogate receptivity to participation in critical illness genetic research: aligning research oversight and stakeholder concerns.

Freeman BD, Butler K, Bolcic-Jankovic D, Clarridge BR, Kennedy CR, LeBlanc J, Chandros Hull S.

Chest. 2015 Apr;147(4):979-88. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-0797.

7.

An empirical study of surrogates' preferred level of control over value-laden life support decisions in intensive care units.

Johnson SK, Bautista CA, Hong SY, Weissfeld L, White DB.

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Apr 1;183(7):915-21. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201008-1214OC. Epub 2010 Oct 29.

8.
9.

Genetic research and testing in critical care: surrogates' perspective.

Freeman BD, Kennedy CR, Coopersmith CM, Zehnbauer BA, Buchman TG.

Crit Care Med. 2006 Apr;34(4):986-94.

PMID:
16484903
10.

Life support for patients without a surrogate decision maker: who decides?

White DB, Curtis JR, Wolf LE, Prendergast TJ, Taichman DB, Kuniyoshi G, Acerra F, Lo B, Luce JM.

Ann Intern Med. 2007 Jul 3;147(1):34-40.

PMID:
17606959
11.

Patient and healthcare professional factors influencing end-of-life decision-making during critical illness: a systematic review.

Frost DW, Cook DJ, Heyland DK, Fowler RA.

Crit Care Med. 2011 May;39(5):1174-89. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31820eacf2. Review.

PMID:
21336127
12.

Using simulation to isolate physician variation in intensive care unit admission decision making for critically ill elders with end-stage cancer: a pilot feasibility study.

Barnato AE, Hsu HE, Bryce CL, Lave JR, Emlet LL, Angus DC, Arnold RM.

Crit Care Med. 2008 Dec;36(12):3156-63. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31818f40d2.

13.

Surrogate consent for genomics research in intensive care.

Shelton AK, Fish AF, Cobb JP, Bachman JA, Jenkins RL, Battistich V, Freeman BD.

Am J Crit Care. 2009 Sep;18(5):418-26; quiz 427. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2009473. Review.

14.

Ethical considerations in the collection of genetic data from critically ill patients: what do published studies reveal about potential directions for empirical ethics research?

Freeman BD, Kennedy CR, Frankel HL, Clarridge B, Bolcic-Jankovic D, Iverson E, Shehane E, Celious A, Zehnbauer BA, Buchman TG.

Pharmacogenomics J. 2010 Apr;10(2):77-85. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2009.61. Epub 2009 Dec 8.

15.

Distinguishing messenger from message in delivering bad news.

Brown S.

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 Apr 15;181(8):873; author reply 873-4. No abstract available.

PMID:
20382802
16.

Health-care decision making. Part I: Legal and ethical principles.

Grant K, Huntington SR.

Physician Assist. 1989 Jun;13(6):93, 96, 98 passim.

PMID:
10314670
17.

Are physicians' recommendations on limiting life support really burdensome?

Gutierrez C, Pastores SM.

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 Apr 15;181(8):873; author reply 873-4. No abstract available.

PMID:
20382803
18.

Surrogate and patient discrepancy regarding consent for critical care research.

Newman JT, Smart A, Reese TR, Williams A, Moss M.

Crit Care Med. 2012 Sep;40(9):2590-4. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318258ff19.

19.
20.

Handling ethical, legal and social issues in birth cohort studies involving genetic research: responses from studies in six countries.

Ries NM, LeGrandeur J, Caulfield T.

BMC Med Ethics. 2010 Mar 23;11:4. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-11-4. Review.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk