Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 106

1.

When should we believe nonrandomized studies of comparative effectiveness?

Hennessy S.

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Dec;90(6):764-6. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2011.243.

PMID:
22089339
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

Assessing the comparative effectiveness of newly marketed medications: methodological challenges and implications for drug development.

Schneeweiss S, Gagne JJ, Glynn RJ, Ruhl M, Rassen JA.

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Dec;90(6):777-90. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2011.235. Epub 2011 Nov 2.

PMID:
22048230
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

Methodological issues in comparative effectiveness research: clinical trials.

Peduzzi P, Kyriakides T, O'Connor TZ, Guarino P, Warren SR, Huang GD.

Am J Med. 2010 Dec;123(12 Suppl 1):e8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.10.003. Review.

PMID:
21184867
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

Measurement error and outcomes defined by exceeding a threshold: biased findings in comparative effectiveness trials.

Bůžková P.

Pharm Stat. 2012 Nov-Dec;11(6):429-41. doi: 10.1002/pst.1530. Epub 2012 Aug 12.

PMID:
22888090
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.
7.

The issue of multiplicity in noninferiority studies.

Ke C, Ding B, Jiang Q, Snapinn SM.

Clin Trials. 2012 Dec;9(6):730-5. doi: 10.1177/1740774512455370. Epub 2012 Aug 9.

PMID:
22879575
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

NINDS common data element project: a long-awaited breakthrough in streamlining trials.

Stone K.

Ann Neurol. 2010 Jul;68(1):A11-3. doi: 10.1002/ana.22114. No abstract available.

PMID:
20583225
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.
10.

Prioritizing comparative effectiveness research: are drug and implementation trials equally worth funding?

Gandjour A.

Pharmacoeconomics. 2011 Jul;29(7):555-61. doi: 10.2165/11588330-000000000-00000.

PMID:
21534639
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Developing a collaborative study protocol for combining payer-specific data and clinical trials for CER.

Sanchez RJ, Mardekian J, Cziraky MJ, Mullins CD.

J Manag Care Pharm. 2011 Nov-Dec;17(9 Suppl A):S34-7. No abstract available.

PMID:
22074673
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
12.

The incident user design in comparative effectiveness research.

Johnson ES, Bartman BA, Briesacher BA, Fleming NS, Gerhard T, Kornegay CJ, Nourjah P, Sauer B, Schumock GT, Sedrakyan A, Stürmer T, West SL, Schneeweiss S.

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Jan;22(1):1-6. doi: 10.1002/pds.3334. Epub 2012 Oct 1. Review.

PMID:
23023988
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

A framework for evidence evaluation and methodological issues in implantable device studies.

Sedrakyan A, Marinac-Dabic D, Normand SL, Mushlin A, Gross T.

Med Care. 2010 Jun;48(6 Suppl):S121-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181d991c4.

PMID:
20421824
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

The critical role of observational evidence in comparative effectiveness research.

Fleurence RL, Naci H, Jansen JP.

Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Oct;29(10):1826-33. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0630.

PMID:
20921482
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
15.

On guidelines for comparative effectiveness research using nonrandomized studies in secondary data sources.

Schneeweiss S.

Value Health. 2009 Nov-Dec;12(8):1041. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00607.x. Epub 2009 Sep 10. No abstract available.

PMID:
19744290
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Comparative effectiveness research: welcome to the real world.

Klein HG.

Transfusion. 2012 Jun;52(6):1162-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03692.x. No abstract available.

PMID:
22686529
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Comparative effectiveness research in spine surgery.

Abdullah KG, Benzel EC, Mroz TE.

Neurosurg Focus. 2012 Jul;33(1):E2. doi: 10.3171/2012.4.FOCUS1290. Review.

PMID:
22746234
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Revisiting issues, drawbacks and opportunities with observational studies in comparative effectiveness research.

Alemayehu D, Cappelleri JC.

J Eval Clin Pract. 2013 Aug;19(4):579-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01802.x. Epub 2011 Nov 29.

PMID:
22128798
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

Comparative effectiveness research: guidelines for good practices are just the beginning.

Johnson ML, Chitnis AS.

Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011 Feb;11(1):51-7. doi: 10.1586/erp.10.93.

PMID:
21351858
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Comparative effectiveness reviews need to pay as much attention to external validity as to internal validity risks of bias.

Tugwell P, Knottnerus A, Idzerda L.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Nov;64(11):1163-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.08.005. No abstract available.

PMID:
21959052
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk