Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 165

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 22064159)

1.

Is funding source related to study reporting quality in obesity or nutrition randomized control trials in top-tier medical journals?

Kaiser KA, Cofield SS, Fontaine KR, Glasser SP, Thabane L, Chu R, Ambrale S, Dwary AD, Kumar A, Nayyar G, Affuso O, Beasley M, Allison DB.

Int J Obes (Lond). 2012 Jul;36(7):977-81. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2011.207. Epub 2011 Nov 8. Review.

2.

Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals.

Turner L, Shamseer L, Altman DG, Weeks L, Peters J, Kober T, Dias S, Schulz KF, Plint AC, Moher D.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11:MR000030. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000030.pub2. Review.

PMID:
23152285
3.

Industry funding and the reporting quality of large long-term weight loss trials.

Thomas O, Thabane L, Douketis J, Chu R, Westfall AO, Allison DB.

Int J Obes (Lond). 2008 Oct;32(10):1531-6. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2008.137. Epub 2008 Aug 19. Review.

4.

Association of industry sponsorship to published outcomes in gastrointestinal clinical research.

Brown A, Kraft D, Schmitz SM, Sharpless V, Martin C, Shah R, Shaheen NJ.

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006 Dec;4(12):1445-51. Epub 2006 Nov 13.

PMID:
17101295
5.

Funding source, trial outcome and reporting quality: are they related? Results of a pilot study.

Clifford TJ, Barrowman NJ, Moher D.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2002 Sep 4;2(1):18.

6.

Modified versus standard intention-to-treat reporting: are there differences in methodological quality, sponsorship, and findings in randomized trials? A cross-sectional study.

Montedori A, Bonacini MI, Casazza G, Luchetta ML, Duca P, Cozzolino F, Abraha I.

Trials. 2011 Feb 28;12:58. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-58.

7.

Standards for reporting randomized controlled trials in neurosurgery.

Kiehna EN, Starke RM, Pouratian N, Dumont AS.

J Neurosurg. 2011 Feb;114(2):280-5. doi: 10.3171/2010.8.JNS091770. Epub 2010 Nov 5. Review.

PMID:
21054137
8.

Reporting of conflicts of interest in meta-analyses of trials of pharmacological treatments.

Roseman M, Milette K, Bero LA, Coyne JC, Lexchin J, Turner EH, Thombs BD.

JAMA. 2011 Mar 9;305(10):1008-17. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.257. Review.

PMID:
21386079
9.

Association between research sponsorship and study outcome in plastic surgery literature.

Momeni A, Becker A, Bannasch H, Antes G, Blümle A, Stark GB.

Ann Plast Surg. 2009 Dec;63(6):661-4. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181951917.

PMID:
19887933
10.

Quality of reporting in randomized trials published in high-quality surgical journals.

Sinha S, Sinha S, Ashby E, Jayaram R, Grocott MP.

J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Nov;209(5):565-571.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.07.019. Epub 2009 Sep 11.

PMID:
19854395
11.

Association of industry funding with the outcome and quality of randomized controlled trials of drug therapy for rheumatoid arthritis.

Khan NA, Lombeida JI, Singh M, Spencer HJ, Torralba KD.

Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Jul;64(7):2059-67. doi: 10.1002/art.34393.

12.

The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: survey of major general medical journals.

Berwanger O, Ribeiro RA, Finkelsztejn A, Watanabe M, Suzumura EA, Duncan BB, Devereaux PJ, Cook D.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Apr;62(4):387-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.05.013. Epub 2008 Nov 17. Review.

PMID:
19010643
13.

Assessment of the quality of reporting in abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in five leading Chinese medical journals.

Chen Y, Li J, Ai C, Duan Y, Wang L, Zhang M, Hopewell S.

PLoS One. 2010 Aug 2;5(8):e11926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011926.

14.

Has the quality of abstracts for randomised controlled trials improved since the release of Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trial guideline for abstract reporting? A survey of four high-profile anaesthesia journals.

Can OS, Yilmaz AA, Hasdogan M, Alkaya F, Turhan SC, Can MF, Alanoglu Z.

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Jul;28(7):485-92. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32833fb96f.

PMID:
21037480
15.

Are reports of randomized controlled trials improving over time? A systematic review of 284 articles published in high-impact general and specialized medical journals.

To MJ, Jones J, Emara M, Jadad AR.

PLoS One. 2013 Dec 31;8(12):e84779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084779. eCollection 2013. Review.

16.

Characteristics of randomized trials published in Latin America and the Caribbean according to funding source.

Reveiz L, Sangalang S, Glujovsky D, Pinzon CE, Asenjo Lobos C, Cortes M, Cañón M, Bardach A, Bonfill X.

PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056410. Epub 2013 Feb 13. Review.

17.

CONSORT adoption and quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: a systematic analysis in two dermatology journals.

Alvarez F, Meyer N, Gourraud PA, Paul C.

Br J Dermatol. 2009 Nov;161(5):1159-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09382.x. Epub 2009 Jun 6.

PMID:
19681881
18.

Improvement in the quality of randomized controlled trials among general anesthesiology journals 2000 to 2006: a 6-year follow-up.

Greenfield ML, Mhyre JM, Mashour GA, Blum JM, Yen EC, Rosenberg AL.

Anesth Analg. 2009 Jun;108(6):1916-21. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31819fe6d7.

PMID:
19448222
19.

The roles of funding source, clinical trial outcome, and quality of reporting in orthopedic surgery literature.

Khan SN, Mermer MJ, Myers E, Sandhu HS.

Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2008 Dec;37(12):E205-12; discussion E212.

PMID:
19212579
20.

Conflicts of interest at medical journals: the influence of industry-supported randomised trials on journal impact factors and revenue - cohort study.

Lundh A, Barbateskovic M, Hróbjartsson A, Gøtzsche PC.

PLoS Med. 2010 Oct 26;7(10):e1000354. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000354. Erratum in: PLoS Med. 2011 Feb;8(2). doi: 10.1371/annotation/7e5c299c-2db7-4ddf-8eff-ab793511eccd.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk