Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 103

1.

High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes.

Cicchetti DV, Feinstein AR.

J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(6):551-8.

PMID:
2189948
2.

High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes.

Feinstein AR, Cicchetti DV.

J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(6):543-9.

PMID:
2348207
3.

Behavior and interpretation of the kappa statistic: resolution of the two paradoxes.

Lantz CA, Nebenzahl E.

J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Apr;49(4):431-4.

PMID:
8621993
4.

Statistical methods in epidemiology. v. Towards an understanding of the kappa coefficient.

Rigby AS.

Disabil Rehabil. 2000 May 20;22(8):339-44. Review.

PMID:
10896093
5.

Observer variation in the assessment of the histopathologic diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Riber C, Tønnesen H, Aru A, Bjerregaard B.

Scand J Gastroenterol. 1999 Jan;34(1):46-9.

PMID:
10048732
6.
7.

Diagnostic accuracy of antimyosin scintigraphy in suspected myocarditis.

Narula J, Khaw BA, Dec GW, Palacios IF, Newell JB, Southern JF, Fallon JT, Strauss HW, Haber E, Yasuda T.

J Nucl Cardiol. 1996 Sep-Oct;3(5):371-81.

PMID:
8902668
8.
9.

Bias, prevalence and kappa.

Byrt T, Bishop J, Carlin JB.

J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 May;46(5):423-9.

PMID:
8501467
10.
11.

Inter-observer variability in the assessment of nerve function in leprosy patients in Ethiopia.

Lienhardt C, Currie H, Wheeler JG.

Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 1995 Mar;63(1):62-76.

PMID:
7730721
12.

Inter-observer and intra-observer variability of the Oxford clinical cataract classification and grading system.

Sparrow JM, Ayliffe W, Bron AJ, Brown NP, Hill AR.

Int Ophthalmol. 1988 Jan;11(3):151-7.

PMID:
3417387
13.

Observer agreement paradoxes in 2x2 tables: comparison of agreement measures.

Shankar V, Bangdiwala SI.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Aug 28;14:100. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-100.

14.

[True and false agreement relations between 2 qualitative tests].

Grenier B.

Pathol Biol (Paris). 1985 Nov;33(9):934-8. French.

PMID:
3909085
15.

[Radiographic signs of scaphoid union after bone grafting: the analysis of inter-observer agreement and intra-observer reproducibility].

Mirić D, Vucković C, Djordjević Z.

Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2005 Mar-Apr;133(3-4):142-5. Serbian.

17.
18.

Observer agreement on pen level prevalence of clinical signs in finishing pigs.

Petersen HH, Enøe C, Nielsen EO.

Prev Vet Med. 2004 Jul 16;64(2-4):147-56.

PMID:
15325769
19.

Inter- and intra-observer variation in the histopathological reporting of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions using a modified Bethesda grading system.

McCluggage WG, Walsh MY, Thornton CM, Hamilton PW, Date A, Caughley LM, Bharucha H.

Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Feb;105(2):206-10.

PMID:
9501788
20.

Interexaminer reliability of low back pain assessment using the McKenzie method.

Kilpikoski S, Airaksinen O, Kankaanpää M, Leminen P, Videman T, Alen M.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Apr 15;27(8):E207-14.

PMID:
11935120
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk