Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 188

Related Citations for PubMed (Select 21887705)

1.

Predicting fractures in an international cohort using risk factor algorithms without BMD.

Sambrook PN, Flahive J, Hooven FH, Boonen S, Chapurlat R, Lindsay R, Nguyen TV, Díez-Perez A, Pfeilschifter J, Greenspan SL, Hosmer D, Netelenbos JC, Adachi JD, Watts NB, Cooper C, Roux C, Rossini M, Siris ES, Silverman S, Saag KG, Compston JE, LaCroix A, Gehlbach S.

J Bone Miner Res. 2011 Nov;26(11):2770-7. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.503.

PMID:
21887705
2.

FRAX® tool, the WHO algorithm to predict osteoporotic fractures: the first analysis of its discriminative and predictive ability in the Spanish FRIDEX cohort.

Azagra R, Roca G, Encabo G, Aguyé A, Zwart M, Güell S, Puchol N, Gene E, Casado E, Sancho P, Solà S, Torán P, Iglesias M, Gisbert MC, López-Expósito F, Pujol-Salud J, Fernandez-Hermida Y, Puente A, Rosàs M, Bou V, Antón JJ, Lansdberg G, Martín-Sánchez JC, Díez-Pérez A, Prieto-Alhambra D.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Oct 22;13:204. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-204.

3.

WHO absolute fracture risk models (FRAX): do clinical risk factors improve fracture prediction in older women without osteoporosis?

Hillier TA, Cauley JA, Rizzo JH, Pedula KL, Ensrud KE, Bauer DC, Lui LY, Vesco KK, Black DM, Donaldson MG, Leblanc ES, Cummings SR.

J Bone Miner Res. 2011 Aug;26(8):1774-82. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.372.

4.

Discriminative value of FRAX for fracture prediction in a cohort of Chinese postmenopausal women.

Cheung EY, Bow CH, Cheung CL, Soong C, Yeung S, Loong C, Kung A.

Osteoporos Int. 2012 Mar;23(3):871-8. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1647-5. Epub 2011 May 12.

PMID:
21562875
5.

Calibration of FRAX ® 3.1 to the Dutch population with data on the epidemiology of hip fractures.

Lalmohamed A, Welsing PM, Lems WF, Jacobs JW, Kanis JA, Johansson H, De Boer A, De Vries F.

Osteoporos Int. 2012 Mar;23(3):861-9. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1852-2. Epub 2011 Nov 26.

6.

Fracture risk prediction using FRAX®: a 10-year follow-up survey of the Japanese Population-Based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Cohort Study.

Tamaki J, Iki M, Kadowaki E, Sato Y, Kajita E, Kagamimori S, Kagawa Y, Yoneshima H.

Osteoporos Int. 2011 Dec;22(12):3037-45. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1537-x. Epub 2011 Jan 29.

PMID:
21279504
7.

Bone mineral density enhances use of clinical risk factors in predicting ten-year risk of osteoporotic fractures in Chinese men: the Hong Kong Osteoporosis Study.

Bow CH, Tsang SW, Loong CH, Soong CS, Yeung SC, Kung AW.

Osteoporos Int. 2011 Nov;22(11):2799-807. doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1490-0. Epub 2011 Jan 14.

9.

Predictive value of FRAX for fracture in obese older women.

Premaor M, Parker RA, Cummings S, Ensrud K, Cauley JA, Lui LY, Hillier T, Compston J; Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF) Research Group.

J Bone Miner Res. 2013 Jan;28(1):188-95. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1729.

10.

Evaluation of the FRAX and Garvan fracture risk calculators in older women.

Bolland MJ, Siu AT, Mason BH, Horne AM, Ames RW, Grey AB, Gamble GD, Reid IR.

J Bone Miner Res. 2011 Feb;26(2):420-7. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.215.

PMID:
20721930
11.

Performance of FRAX in a cohort of community-dwelling, ambulatory older men: the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) study.

Ettinger B, Ensrud KE, Blackwell T, Curtis JR, Lapidus JA, Orwoll ES; Osteoporotic Fracture in Men (MrOS) Study Research Group.

Osteoporos Int. 2013 Apr;24(4):1185-93. doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-2215-3. Epub 2012 Nov 21.

12.

FRAX underestimates fracture risk in patients with diabetes.

Giangregorio LM, Leslie WD, Lix LM, Johansson H, Oden A, McCloskey E, Kanis JA.

J Bone Miner Res. 2012 Feb;27(2):301-8. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.556.

PMID:
22052532
13.

Construction of a FRAX® model for the assessment of fracture probability in Canada and implications for treatment.

Leslie WD, Lix LM, Langsetmo L, Berger C, Goltzman D, Hanley DA, Adachi JD, Johansson H, Oden A, McCloskey E, Kanis JA.

Osteoporos Int. 2011 Mar;22(3):817-27. doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1464-2. Epub 2010 Dec 16.

PMID:
21161509
14.

Fracture prediction and calibration of a Canadian FRAX® tool: a population-based report from CaMos.

Fraser LA, Langsetmo L, Berger C, Ioannidis G, Goltzman D, Adachi JD, Papaioannou A, Josse R, Kovacs CS, Olszynski WP, Towheed T, Hanley DA, Kaiser SM, Prior J, Jamal S, Kreiger N, Brown JP, Johansson H, Oden A, McCloskey E, Kanis JA, Leslie WD; CaMos Research Group.

Osteoporos Int. 2011 Mar;22(3):829-37. doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1465-1. Epub 2010 Dec 16.

PMID:
21161508
15.

A comparison of prediction models for fractures in older women: is more better?

Ensrud KE, Lui LY, Taylor BC, Schousboe JT, Donaldson MG, Fink HA, Cauley JA, Hillier TA, Browner WS, Cummings SR; Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Arch Intern Med. 2009 Dec 14;169(22):2087-94. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.404.

16.

Evaluation of FRAX to characterise fracture risk in Poland.

Czerwinski E, Kanis JA, Osieleniec J, Kumorek A, Milert A, Johansson H, McCloskey EV, Gorkiewicz M.

Osteoporos Int. 2011 Sep;22(9):2507-12. doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1502-0. Epub 2010 Dec 3.

PMID:
21127840
17.

Probability of fractures predicted by FRAX® and observed incidence in the Spanish ECOSAP Study cohort.

González-Macías J, Marin F, Vila J, Díez-Pérez A.

Bone. 2012 Jan;50(1):373-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.11.006. Epub 2011 Nov 20.

PMID:
22129640
18.

Primary care use of FRAX: absolute fracture risk assessment in postmenopausal women and older men.

Siris ES, Baim S, Nattiv A.

Postgrad Med. 2010 Jan;122(1):82-90. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2010.01.2102. Review.

PMID:
20107292
19.

Predictive value of low BMD for 1-year fracture outcomes is similar for postmenopausal women ages 50-64 and 65 and Older: results from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment (NORA).

Siris ES, Brenneman SK, Miller PD, Barrett-Connor E, Chen YT, Sherwood LM, Abbott TA.

J Bone Miner Res. 2004 Aug;19(8):1215-20. Epub 2004 May 10.

PMID:
15231007
20.

Utilization of DXA Bone Mineral Densitometry in Ontario: An Evidence-Based Analysis.

Health Quality Ontario.

Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006;6(20):1-180. Epub 2006 Nov 1.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk