Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 105

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 21857023)

1.

The Triangle Model for evaluating the effect of health information technology on healthcare quality and safety.

Ancker JS, Kern LM, Abramson E, Kaushal R.

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jan-Feb;19(1):61-5. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000385. Epub 2011 Aug 20.

2.

Medical informatics in the intensive care unit: overview of technology assessment.

Adhikari N, Lapinsky SE.

J Crit Care. 2003 Mar;18(1):41-7. Review.

PMID:
12640613
3.

The impact of eHealth on the quality and safety of health care: a systematic overview.

Black AD, Car J, Pagliari C, Anandan C, Cresswell K, Bokun T, McKinstry B, Procter R, Majeed A, Sheikh A.

PLoS Med. 2011 Jan 18;8(1):e1000387. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000387. Review.

4.

Going online: The role of web-based initiatives in health information technology.

Clingan SA.

J Med Pract Manage. 2011 Jan-Feb;26(4):225-7.

PMID:
21506462
5.

Identification of features of electronic prescribing systems to support quality and safety in primary care using a modified Delphi process.

Sweidan M, Williamson M, Reeve JF, Harvey K, O'Neill JA, Schattner P, Snowdon T.

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010 Apr 15;10:21. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-10-21.

6.

The study of client-provider interactions: a review of methodological issues.

Simmons R, Elias C.

Stud Fam Plann. 1994 Jan-Feb;25(1):1-17. Review.

PMID:
8209391
7.

Using information technology to improve the quality and safety of emergency care.

Handel DA, Wears RL, Nathanson LA, Pines JM.

Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Jun;18(6):e45-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01070.x.

PMID:
21676049
8.

Leveraging information technology to improve quality and safety.

Einbinder JS, Bates DW.

Yearb Med Inform. 2007:22-9. Review. Erratum in: Yearb Med Inform. 2008:19.

PMID:
17700900
9.
10.

Telehealth success: evaluation framework development.

Hebert M.

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2001;84(Pt 2):1145-9.

PMID:
11604908
11.

A socio-technical model of health information technology-related e-iatrogenesis.

Sittig DF.

AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2008 Nov 6:1209-10.

PMID:
18998788
12.

Health services research evaluation principles. Broadening a general framework for evaluating health information technology.

Sockolow PS, Crawford PR, Lehmann HP.

Methods Inf Med. 2012;51(2):122-30. doi: 10.3414/ME10-01-0066. Epub 2012 Feb 7.

PMID:
22311125
13.

A new sociotechnical model for studying health information technology in complex adaptive healthcare systems.

Sittig DF, Singh H.

Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Oct;19 Suppl 3:i68-74. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2010.042085.

14.

Public attitudes about health information technology, and its relationship to health care quality, costs, and privacy.

Gaylin DS, Moiduddin A, Mohamoud S, Lundeen K, Kelly JA.

Health Serv Res. 2011 Jun;46(3):920-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01233.x. Epub 2011 Jan 28.

15.

Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care.

Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, Maglione M, Mojica W, Roth E, Morton SC, Shekelle PG.

Ann Intern Med. 2006 May 16;144(10):742-52. Epub 2006 Apr 11. Review.

PMID:
16702590
16.

An inventory of evaluation studies of information technology in health care: trends in evaluation research 1982-2002.

Ammenwerth E, de Keizer N.

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;107(Pt 2):1289-94.

PMID:
15361022
17.

Information technology as an infrastructure for patient safety: nursing research needs.

Newbold SK, Kuperman GJ, Bakken S, Brennan PF, Mendonca EA, Park HA, Radenovic A.

Int J Med Inform. 2004 Aug;73(7-8):657-62.

PMID:
15246047
18.

[Quality of health care, accreditation, and health technology assessment in Croatia: role of agency for quality and accreditation in health].

Mittermayer R, Huić M, Mestrović J.

Acta Med Croatica. 2010 Dec;64(5):425-34. Croatian.

PMID:
21692267
19.
20.

An inventory of evaluation studies of information technology in health care trends in evaluation research 1982-2002.

Ammenwerth E, de Keizer N.

Methods Inf Med. 2005;44(1):44-56. Erratum in: Methods Inf Med. 2005;44(3):III.

PMID:
15778794
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk