Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 719

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 21727289)

1.

Personalizing mammography by breast density and other risk factors for breast cancer: analysis of health benefits and cost-effectiveness.

Schousboe JT, Kerlikowske K, Loh A, Cummings SR.

Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jul 5;155(1):10-20. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-1-201107050-00003.

2.

Benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of supplemental ultrasonography screening for women with dense breasts.

Sprague BL, Stout NK, Schechter C, van Ravesteyn NT, Cevik M, Alagoz O, Lee CI, van den Broek JJ, Miglioretti DL, Mandelblatt JS, de Koning HJ, Kerlikowske K, Lehman CD, Tosteson AN.

Ann Intern Med. 2015 Feb 3;162(3):157-66. doi: 10.7326/M14-0692.

PMID:
25486550
3.

Cost-effectiveness of screening women with familial risk for breast cancer with magnetic resonance imaging.

Saadatmand S, Tilanus-Linthorst MM, Rutgers EJ, Hoogerbrugge N, Oosterwijk JC, Tollenaar RA, Hooning M, Loo CE, Obdeijn IM, Heijnsdijk EA, de Koning HJ.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Sep 4;105(17):1314-21. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt203. Epub 2013 Aug 12.

4.

Benefits, harms, and costs for breast cancer screening after US implementation of digital mammography.

Stout NK, Lee SJ, Schechter CB, Kerlikowske K, Alagoz O, Berry D, Buist DS, Cevik M, Chisholm G, de Koning HJ, Huang H, Hubbard RA, Miglioretti DL, Munsell MF, Trentham-Dietz A, van Ravesteyn NT, Tosteson AN, Mandelblatt JS.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 May 28;106(6):dju092. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju092. Print 2014 Jun.

5.

Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography breast cancer screening.

Tosteson AN, Stout NK, Fryback DG, Acharyya S, Herman BA, Hannah LG, Pisano ED; DMIST Investigators.

Ann Intern Med. 2008 Jan 1;148(1):1-10.

6.

Cost-effectiveness of alternating magnetic resonance imaging and digital mammography screening in BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers.

Cott Chubiz JE, Lee JM, Gilmore ME, Kong CY, Lowry KP, Halpern EF, McMahon PM, Ryan PD, Gazelle GS.

Cancer. 2013 Mar 15;119(6):1266-76. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27864. Epub 2012 Nov 26.

7.

Cost-effectiveness of MRI compared to mammography for breast cancer screening in a high risk population.

Moore SG, Shenoy PJ, Fanucchi L, Tumeh JW, Flowers CR.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Jan 13;9:9. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-9.

8.

Evaluation of mammographic surveillance services in women aged 40-49 years with a moderate family history of breast cancer: a single-arm cohort study.

Duffy SW, Mackay J, Thomas S, Anderson E, Chen TH, Ellis I, Evans G, Fielder H, Fox R, Gui G, Macmillan D, Moss S, Rogers C, Sibbering M, Wallis M, Warren R, Watson E, Whynes D, Allgood P, Caunt J.

Health Technol Assess. 2013 Mar;17(11):vii-xiv, 1-95. doi: 10.3310/hta17110.

9.

Retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of screening mammography.

Stout NK, Rosenberg MA, Trentham-Dietz A, Smith MA, Robinson SM, Fryback DG.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 Jun 7;98(11):774-82.

10.

Tipping the balance of benefits and harms to favor screening mammography starting at age 40 years: a comparative modeling study of risk.

van Ravesteyn NT, Miglioretti DL, Stout NK, Lee SJ, Schechter CB, Buist DS, Huang H, Heijnsdijk EA, Trentham-Dietz A, Alagoz O, Near AM, Kerlikowske K, Nelson HD, Mandelblatt JS, de Koning HJ.

Ann Intern Med. 2012 May 1;156(9):609-17. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-9-201205010-00002.

11.

Effects of mammography screening under different screening schedules: model estimates of potential benefits and harms.

Mandelblatt JS, Cronin KA, Bailey S, Berry DA, de Koning HJ, Draisma G, Huang H, Lee SJ, Munsell M, Plevritis SK, Ravdin P, Schechter CB, Sigal B, Stoto MA, Stout NK, van Ravesteyn NT, Venier J, Zelen M, Feuer EJ; Breast Cancer Working Group of the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network.

Ann Intern Med. 2009 Nov 17;151(10):738-47. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-10-200911170-00010. Erratum in: Ann Intern Med. 2010 Jan 19;152(2):136.

12.

Cost-effectiveness of annual versus biennial screening mammography for women with high mammographic breast density.

Pataky R, Ismail Z, Coldman AJ, Elwood M, Gelmon K, Hedden L, Hislop G, Kan L, McCoy B, Olivotto IA, Peacock S.

J Med Screen. 2014 Dec;21(4):180-8. doi: 10.1177/0969141314549758. Epub 2014 Sep 3.

PMID:
25186116
13.

Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging.

Plevritis SK, Kurian AW, Sigal BM, Daniel BL, Ikeda DM, Stockdale FE, Garber AM.

JAMA. 2006 May 24;295(20):2374-84.

PMID:
16720823
14.

Cost-effectiveness of MRI for breast cancer screening in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.

Pataky R, Armstrong L, Chia S, Coldman AJ, Kim-Sing C, McGillivray B, Scott J, Wilson CM, Peacock S.

BMC Cancer. 2013 Jul 10;13:339. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-339.

15.

[Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].

Paci E, Mantellini P, Giorgi Rossi P, Falini P, Puliti D; TBST Working Group.

Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Jul-Oct;37(4-5):317-27. Italian.

PMID:
24293498
16.

Cost-effectiveness of population screening for BRCA mutations in Ashkenazi jewish women compared with family history-based testing.

Manchanda R, Legood R, Burnell M, McGuire A, Raikou M, Loggenberg K, Wardle J, Sanderson S, Gessler S, Side L, Balogun N, Desai R, Kumar A, Dorkins H, Wallis Y, Chapman C, Taylor R, Jacobs C, Tomlinson I, Beller U, Menon U, Jacobs I.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Nov 30;107(1):380. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju380. Print 2015 Jan.

17.

Outcomes of screening mammography by frequency, breast density, and postmenopausal hormone therapy.

Kerlikowske K, Zhu W, Hubbard RA, Geller B, Dittus K, Braithwaite D, Wernli KJ, Miglioretti DL, O'Meara ES; Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

JAMA Intern Med. 2013 May 13;173(9):807-16. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.307.

18.

Program-specific cost-effectiveness analysis: breast cancer screening policies for a safety-net program.

Melnikow J, Tancredi DJ, Yang Z, Ritley D, Jiang Y, Slee C, Popova S, Rylett P, Knutson K, Smalley S.

Value Health. 2013 Sep-Oct;16(6):932-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.06.013.

PMID:
24041343
19.

Cost effectiveness of the NHS breast screening programme: life table model.

Pharoah PD, Sewell B, Fitzsimmons D, Bennett HS, Pashayan N.

BMJ. 2013 May 9;346:f2618. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f2618. Erratum in: BMJ. 2013;346:f3822.

20.

Cost-effectiveness of breast MR imaging and screen-film mammography for screening BRCA1 gene mutation carriers.

Lee JM, McMahon PM, Kong CY, Kopans DB, Ryan PD, Ozanne EM, Halpern EF, Gazelle GS.

Radiology. 2010 Mar;254(3):793-800. doi: 10.1148/radiol.09091086.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk