Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 101

Related Citations for PubMed (Select 21679896)

1.

Gadolinium can depict area at risk and myocardial infarction: a double-edged sword?

Arai AE.

JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Jun;4(6):619-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.04.006. No abstract available.

2.

Peri-infarct zone on early contrast-enhanced CMR imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Matsumoto H, Matsuda T, Miyamoto K, Shimada T, Mikuri M, Hiraoka Y.

JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Jun;4(6):610-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.03.015.

3.

Infarcted myocardium in pigs: MR imaging enhanced with slow-interstitial-diffusion gadolinium compound P760.

Kroft LJ, Doornbos J, van der Geest RJ, Benderbous S, de Roos A.

Radiology. 1999 Aug;212(2):467-73.

PMID:
10429705
4.

Macrocyclic contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging of chronic myocardial infarction: intraindividual comparison of gadobutrol and gadoterate meglumine.

Wagner M, Schilling R, Doeblin P, Huppertz A, Luhur R, Schwenke C, Maurer M, Hamm B, Taupitz M, Durmus T.

Eur Radiol. 2013 Jan;23(1):108-14. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2563-6. Epub 2012 Jul 8.

PMID:
22772150
5.

Assessment of acute myocardial infarction in man with magnetic resonance imaging and the use of a new paramagnetic contrast agent gadolinium-BOPTA.

Holman ER, van Rossum AC, Doesburg T, van der Wall EE, de Roos A, Visser CA.

Magn Reson Imaging. 1996;14(1):21-9.

PMID:
8656987
6.

Correction with blood T1 is essential when measuring post-contrast myocardial T1 value in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Choi EY, Hwang SH, Yoon YW, Park CH, Paek MY, Greiser A, Chung H, Yoon JH, Kim JY, Min PK, Lee BK, Hong BK, Rim SJ, Kwon HM, Kim TH.

J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013 Jan 19;15:11. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-15-11.

7.

Distribution of intracellular, extracellular, and intravascular contrast media for magnetic resonance imaging in hearts subjected to reperfused myocardial infarction.

Wendland MF, Saeed M, Geschwind JF, Mann JS, Brasch RC, Higgins CB.

Acad Radiol. 1996 Aug;3 Suppl 2:S402-4. No abstract available.

PMID:
8796614
8.

Image. Cardiac magnetic resonance for diagnosis of lipomatous metaplasia of chronic myocardial infarction.

Garot J, Barbou F, Morice MC.

Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2009 Jun-Jul;102(6-7):589-90. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2009.04.005. Epub 2009 Jun 18. No abstract available.

9.

Sequential analysis of infarcted and normal myocardium in piglets using in vivo gadolinium-enhanced MR images.

van Dijkman PR, Höld KM, van der Laarse A, Holman ER, Ozdemir HI, van der Nat TH, de Roos A, van der Wall EE.

Magn Reson Imaging. 1993;11(2):207-18.

PMID:
8455431
10.

Magnetic resonance imaging of myocardial infarction using gadolinium-based contrast agent.

Thomas B, Tavares NJ.

Rev Port Cardiol. 2004 Nov;23(11):1399-405.

11.

Myocardial area at risk after ST-elevation myocardial infarction measured with the late gadolinium enhancement after scar remodeling and T2-weighted cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Lønborg J, Engstrøm T, Mathiasen AB, Vejlstrup N.

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Aug;28(6):1455-64. doi: 10.1007/s10554-011-9952-9. Epub 2011 Oct 5.

PMID:
21971845
12.

Evaluation of techniques for the quantification of myocardial scar of differing etiology using cardiac magnetic resonance.

Flett AS, Hasleton J, Cook C, Hausenloy D, Quarta G, Ariti C, Muthurangu V, Moon JC.

JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Feb;4(2):150-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.11.015.

13.

[Determining myocardial viability in myocardial infarct. Comparison of single and multisclice MRI techniques with TurboFlash and TrueFISP sequences].

Huber A, Schönberg SO, Spannagl B, Rieber J, Klauss V, Reiser MF.

Radiologe. 2004 Feb;44(2):146-51. German.

PMID:
14991133
14.
15.

Cell therapy in reperfused acute myocardial infarction does not improve the recovery of perfusion in the infarcted myocardium: a cardiac MR imaging study.

Robbers LF, Nijveldt R, Beek AM, Hirsch A, van der Laan AM, Delewi R, van der Vleuten PA, Tio RA, Tijssen JG, Hofman MB, Piek JJ, Zijlstra F, van Rossum AC; HEBE Investigators.

Radiology. 2014 Jul;272(1):113-22. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14131121. Epub 2014 Mar 8.

PMID:
24617731
16.

Impact of microvascular obstruction and infarct size on left ventricular remodeling in reperfused myocardial infarction: a contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging study.

Lombardo A, Niccoli G, Natale L, Bernardini A, Cosentino N, Bonomo L, Crea F.

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Apr;28(4):835-42. doi: 10.1007/s10554-011-9901-7. Epub 2011 Jun 5.

PMID:
21643941
17.

Blood pool contrast agent CMD-A2-Gd-DOTA-enhanced MR imaging of infarcted myocardium in pigs.

Kroft LJ, Doornbos J, van der Geest RJ, de Roos A.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999 Aug;10(2):170-7.

PMID:
10441021
18.

Dynamic T1 measurement using snapshot-FLASH MRI.

Jivan A, Horsfield MA, Moody AR, Cherryman GR.

J Magn Reson. 1997 Jul;127(1):65-72.

PMID:
9245631
19.

Binding of gadobenate dimeglumine to proteins extravasated into interstitial space enhances conspicuity of reperfused infarcts.

Cavagna FM, Marzola P, Daprà M, Maggioni F, Vicinanza E, Castelli PM, de Haën C, Luchinat C, Wendland MF, Saeed M, et al.

Invest Radiol. 1994 Jun;29 Suppl 2:S50-3. No abstract available.

PMID:
7928270
20.

Myocardium at risk in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction comparison of T2-weighted edema imaging with the MR-assessed endocardial surface area and validation against angiographic scoring.

Fuernau G, Eitel I, Franke V, Hildebrandt L, Meissner J, de Waha S, Lurz P, Gutberlet M, Desch S, Schuler G, Thiele H.

JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Sep;4(9):967-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.02.023.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk