Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 273

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 21669366)

1.

Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 1.

Jansen JP, Fleurence R, Devine B, Itzler R, Barrett A, Hawkins N, Lee K, Boersma C, Annemans L, Cappelleri JC.

Value Health. 2011 Jun;14(4):417-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.04.002.

PMID:
21669366
2.

Conducting indirect-treatment-comparison and network-meta-analysis studies: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 2.

Hoaglin DC, Hawkins N, Jansen JP, Scott DA, Itzler R, Cappelleri JC, Boersma C, Thompson D, Larholt KM, Diaz M, Barrett A.

Value Health. 2011 Jun;14(4):429-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.01.011.

PMID:
21669367
3.

Conjoint analysis applications in health--a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force.

Bridges JF, Hauber AB, Marshall D, Lloyd A, Prosser LA, Regier DA, Johnson FR, Mauskopf J.

Value Health. 2011 Jun;14(4):403-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.11.013. Epub 2011 Apr 22.

PMID:
21669364
4.

Indirect treatment comparison/network meta-analysis study questionnaire to assess relevance and credibility to inform health care decision making: an ISPOR-AMCP-NPC Good Practice Task Force report.

Jansen JP, Trikalinos T, Cappelleri JC, Daw J, Andes S, Eldessouki R, Salanti G.

Value Health. 2014 Mar;17(2):157-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.01.004.

PMID:
24636374
5.

Indirect comparisons of competing interventions.

Glenny AM, Altman DG, Song F, Sakarovitch C, Deeks JJ, D'Amico R, Bradburn M, Eastwood AJ; International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group.

Health Technol Assess. 2005 Jul;9(26):1-134, iii-iv.

6.

The ISPOR Good Practices for Quality Improvement of Cost-Effectiveness Research Task Force Report.

McGhan WF, Al M, Doshi JA, Kamae I, Marx SE, Rindress D.

Value Health. 2009 Nov-Dec;12(8):1086-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00605.x. Epub 2009 Sep 10.

PMID:
19744291
7.

Taking conjoint analysis to task.

Ryan M.

Value Health. 2011 Jun;14(4):401-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.04.001. No abstract available.

PMID:
21669363
8.

Bayesian meta-analysis of multiple treatment comparisons: an introduction to mixed treatment comparisons.

Jansen JP, Crawford B, Bergman G, Stam W.

Value Health. 2008 Sep-Oct;11(5):956-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00347.x. Epub 2008 May 16. Review.

PMID:
18489499
9.

Good research practices for cost-effectiveness analysis alongside clinical trials: the ISPOR RCT-CEA Task Force report.

Ramsey S, Willke R, Briggs A, Brown R, Buxton M, Chawla A, Cook J, Glick H, Liljas B, Petitti D, Reed S.

Value Health. 2005 Sep-Oct;8(5):521-33. Review.

PMID:
16176491
10.

Principles of good practice for budget impact analysis: report of the ISPOR Task Force on good research practices--budget impact analysis.

Mauskopf JA, Sullivan SD, Annemans L, Caro J, Mullins CD, Nuijten M, Orlewska E, Watkins J, Trueman P.

Value Health. 2007 Sep-Oct;10(5):336-47.

PMID:
17888098
11.

[Indirect comparison and network meta-analyses--new tools for the assessment of evidence on the relative efficacy of drugs].

Peura P, Asseburg C, Turunen J, Purmonen T, Martikainen J.

Duodecim. 2011;127(9):900-10. Review. Finnish.

PMID:
21648163
12.

Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report.

Coons SJ, Gwaltney CJ, Hays RD, Lundy JJ, Sloan JA, Revicki DA, Lenderking WR, Cella D, Basch E; ISPOR ePRO Task Force.

Value Health. 2009 Jun;12(4):419-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00470.x. Epub 2008 Nov 11.

PMID:
19900250
14.

Using real-world data for coverage and payment decisions: the ISPOR Real-World Data Task Force report.

Garrison LP Jr, Neumann PJ, Erickson P, Marshall D, Mullins CD.

Value Health. 2007 Sep-Oct;10(5):326-35.

PMID:
17888097
16.

Graphical exploration of network meta-analysis data: the use of multidimensional scaling.

Chung H, Lumley T.

Clin Trials. 2008;5(4):301-7. doi: 10.1177/1740774508093614.

PMID:
18697844
17.

Incorporating multiple interventions in meta-analysis: an evaluation of the mixed treatment comparison with the adjusted indirect comparison.

O'Regan C, Ghement I, Eyawo O, Guyatt GH, Mills EJ.

Trials. 2009 Sep 21;10:86. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-86.

18.

Principles of good practice for decision analytic modeling in health-care evaluation: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Good Research Practices--Modeling Studies.

Weinstein MC, O'Brien B, Hornberger J, Jackson J, Johannesson M, McCabe C, Luce BR; ISPOR Task Force on Good Research Practices--Modeling Studies.

Value Health. 2003 Jan-Feb;6(1):9-17.

PMID:
12535234
19.

Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.

Higashida RT, Furlan AJ, Roberts H, Tomsick T, Connors B, Barr J, Dillon W, Warach S, Broderick J, Tilley B, Sacks D; Technology Assessment Committee of the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology; Technology Assessment Committee of the Society of Interventional Radiology.

Stroke. 2003 Aug;34(8):e109-37. Epub 2003 Jul 17. Erratum in: Stroke. 2003 Nov;34(11):2774.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk