Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 211

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 21610539)

2.
4.

The effect of plate rotation on the stiffness of femoral LISS: a mechanical study.

Khalafi A, Curtiss S, Hazelwood S, Wolinsky P.

J Orthop Trauma. 2006 Sep;20(8):542-6.

PMID:
16990725
5.

A biomechanical comparison of locked plate fixation with percutaneous insertion capability versus the angled blade plate in a subtrochanteric fracture gap model.

Crist BD, Khalafi A, Hazelwood SJ, Lee MA.

J Orthop Trauma. 2009 Oct;23(9):622-7. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181a2a31d.

PMID:
19897982
6.

Biomechanical comparison of bicortical versus unicortical screw placement of proximal tibia locking plates: a cadaveric model.

Dougherty PJ, Kim DG, Meisterling S, Wybo C, Yeni Y.

J Orthop Trauma. 2008 Jul;22(6):399-403. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318178417e.

PMID:
18594304
7.

Biomechanical comparison of flexible stainless steel and titanium nails with external fixation using a femur fracture model.

Mani US, Sabatino CT, Sabharwal S, Svach DJ, Suslak A, Behrens FF.

J Pediatr Orthop. 2006 Mar-Apr;26(2):182-7.

PMID:
16557131
8.

Biomechanical comparison of stainless steel and titanium nails for fixation of simulated femoral fractures.

Mahar AT, Lee SS, Lalonde FD, Impelluso T, Newton PO.

J Pediatr Orthop. 2004 Nov-Dec;24(6):638-41.

PMID:
15502562
9.

Biomechanical comparison of polyaxial-type locking plates and a fixed-angle locking plate for internal fixation of distal femur fractures.

Otto RJ, Moed BR, Bledsoe JG.

J Orthop Trauma. 2009 Oct;23(9):645-52. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181a567c8.

PMID:
19897986
10.

Medial malleolar fractures: a biomechanical study of fixation techniques.

Fowler TT, Pugh KJ, Litsky AS, Taylor BC, French BG.

Orthopedics. 2011 Aug 8;34(8):e349-55. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20110627-09.

PMID:
21815575
11.

Distal femoral fixation: a biomechanical comparison of trigen retrograde intramedullary (i.m.) nail, dynamic condylar screw (DCS), and locking compression plate (LCP) condylar plate.

Heiney JP, Barnett MD, Vrabec GA, Schoenfeld AJ, Baji A, Njus GO.

J Trauma. 2009 Feb;66(2):443-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31815edeb8.

PMID:
19204519
12.

Biomechanical evaluation of fracture fixation constructs using a variable-angle locked periprosthetic femur plate system.

Hoffmann MF, Burgers TA, Mason JJ, Williams BO, Sietsema DL, Jones CB.

Injury. 2014 Jul;45(7):1035-41. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.02.038. Epub 2014 Mar 11.

PMID:
24680467
14.

Fixation of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures occurring at the tip of the stem: a biomechanical study of 5 techniques.

Dennis MG, Simon JA, Kummer FJ, Koval KJ, DiCesare PE.

J Arthroplasty. 2000 Jun;15(4):523-8.

PMID:
10884215
15.

The effects of screw length on stability of simulated osteoporotic distal radius fractures fixed with volar locking plates.

Wall LB, Brodt MD, Silva MJ, Boyer MI, Calfee RP.

J Hand Surg Am. 2012 Mar;37(3):446-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.12.013. Epub 2012 Feb 2.

16.

Biomechanical analysis of bicortical versus unicortical locked plating of mid-clavicular fractures.

Hamman D, Lindsey D, Dragoo J.

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011 Jun;131(6):773-8. doi: 10.1007/s00402-010-1212-2. Epub 2010 Nov 11.

PMID:
21069362
17.

Polyaxial locking plate fixation in distal femur fractures: a biomechanical comparison.

Wilkens KJ, Curtiss S, Lee MA.

J Orthop Trauma. 2008 Oct;22(9):624-8. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31818896b3.

PMID:
18827592
18.
19.

Biplanar fixation of a locking plate in the diaphysis improves construct strength.

Denard PJ, Doornink J, Phelan D, Madey SM, Fitzpatrick DC, Bottlang M.

Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2011 Jun;26(5):484-90. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.12.005. Epub 2011 Jan 8.

PMID:
21216509
20.
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk