Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 150

1.

Is computer aided detection (CAD) cost effective in screening mammography? A model based on the CADET II study.

Guerriero C, Gillan MG, Cairns J, Wallis MG, Gilbert FJ.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Jan 17;11:11. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-11.

2.

Comparison of computer-aided detection to double reading of screening mammograms: review of 231,221 mammograms.

Gromet M.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Apr;190(4):854-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2812.

PMID:
18356428
3.

Cost-effectiveness analysis for breast cancer screening: double reading versus single + CAD reading.

Sato M, Kawai M, Nishino Y, Shibuya D, Ohuchi N, Ishibashi T.

Breast Cancer. 2014 Sep;21(5):532-41. doi: 10.1007/s12282-012-0423-5. Epub 2012 Oct 27.

PMID:
23104393
4.

Mammographic features of breast cancers at single reading with computer-aided detection and at double reading in a large multicenter prospective trial of computer-aided detection: CADET II.

James JJ, Gilbert FJ, Wallis MG, Gillan MG, Astley SM, Boggis CR, Agbaje OF, Brentnall AR, Duffy SW.

Radiology. 2010 Aug;256(2):379-86. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10091899.

PMID:
20656831
5.

Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms.

Skaane P, Kshirsagar A, Stapleton S, Young K, Castellino RA.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Feb;188(2):377-84.

PMID:
17242245
6.

Early detection of breast cancer: overview of the evidence on computer-aided detection in mammography screening.

Houssami N, Given-Wilson R, Ciatto S.

J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2009 Apr;53(2):171-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2009.02062.x. Review.

PMID:
19527363
7.

Invasive breast cancers detected by screening mammography: a detailed comparison of computer-aided detection-assisted single reading and double reading.

Cawson JN, Nickson C, Amos A, Hill G, Whan AB, Kavanagh AM.

J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2009 Oct;53(5):442-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2009.02100.x.

PMID:
19788479
8.

Mammography screening using independent double reading with consensus: is there a potential benefit for computer-aided detection?

Skaane P, Kshirsagar A, Hofvind S, Jahr G, Castellino RA.

Acta Radiol. 2012 Apr 1;53(3):241-8. doi: 10.1258/ar.2011.110452. Epub 2012 Jan 27.

PMID:
22287148
9.
10.

Single reading with computer-aided detection and double reading of screening mammograms in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Program.

Gilbert FJ, Astley SM, McGee MA, Gillan MG, Boggis CR, Griffiths PM, Duffy SW.

Radiology. 2006 Oct;241(1):47-53.

PMID:
16990670
11.

Blinded comparison of computer-aided detection with human second reading in screening mammography.

Georgian-Smith D, Moore RH, Halpern E, Yeh ED, Rafferty EA, D'Alessandro HA, Staffa M, Hall DA, McCarthy KA, Kopans DB.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Nov;189(5):1135-41.

PMID:
17954651
12.

Computer-aided detection in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Programme: prospective study.

Khoo LA, Taylor P, Given-Wilson RM.

Radiology. 2005 Nov;237(2):444-9.

PMID:
16244252
13.
14.
15.

Single reading with computer-aided detection for screening mammography.

Gilbert FJ, Astley SM, Gillan MG, Agbaje OF, Wallis MG, James J, Boggis CR, Duffy SW; CADET II Group.

N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 16;359(16):1675-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0803545. Epub 2008 Oct 1.

16.

Does computer-aided detection have a role in the arbitration of discordant double-reading opinions in a breast-screening programme?

James JJ, Cornford EJ.

Clin Radiol. 2009 Jan;64(1):46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2008.07.008. Epub 2008 Sep 4.

PMID:
19070697
17.

Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters.

Duijm LE, Groenewoud JH, Fracheboud J, de Koning HJ.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Aug 1;99(15):1162-70. Epub 2007 Jul 24.

18.

Incremental cost-effectiveness of double-reading mammograms.

Leivo T, Salminen T, Sintonen H, Tuominen R, Auerma K, Partanen K, Saari U, Hakama M, Heinonen OP.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1999 Apr;54(3):261-7.

PMID:
10445425
19.

Effectiveness of computer-aided detection in community mammography practice.

Fenton JJ, Abraham L, Taplin SH, Geller BM, Carney PA, D'Orsi C, Elmore JG, Barlow WE; Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Aug 3;103(15):1152-61. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr206. Epub 2011 Jul 27.

20.

Computer-aided detection for computed tomographic colonography screening: a prospective comparison of a double-reading paradigm with first-reader computer-aided detection against second-reader computer-aided detection.

Iussich G, Correale L, Senore C, Hassan C, Segnan N, Campanella D, Bert A, Galatola G, Laudi C, Regge D.

Invest Radiol. 2014 Mar;49(3):173-82. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000009.

PMID:
24442160
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk