Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 97

1.

Statistically robust measurement of evoked response onset latencies.

Letham B, Raij T.

J Neurosci Methods. 2011 Jan 15;194(2):374-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.10.016. Epub 2010 Oct 23.

PMID:
20974175
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
2.

Cerebral magnetic responses to noise bursts and pauses of different durations.

Joutsiniemi SL, Hari R, Vilkman V.

Audiology. 1989;28(6):325-33.

PMID:
2597096
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

Parallels between timing of onset responses of single neurons in cat and of evoked magnetic fields in human auditory cortex.

Biermann S, Heil P.

J Neurophysiol. 2000 Nov;84(5):2426-39.

PMID:
11067985
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
4.

Systematic latency variation of the auditory evoked M100: from average to single-trial data.

Salajegheh A, Link A, Elster C, Burghoff M, Sander T, Trahms L, Poeppel D.

Neuroimage. 2004 Sep;23(1):288-95.

PMID:
15325376
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

Timing of pure tone and noise-evoked responses in macaque auditory cortex.

Lakatos P, Pincze Z, Fu KM, Javitt DC, Karmos G, Schroeder CE.

Neuroreport. 2005 Jun 21;16(9):933-7.

PMID:
15931064
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

Fully complex magnetoencephalography.

Simon JZ, Wang Y.

J Neurosci Methods. 2005 Nov 30;149(1):64-73. Epub 2005 Jul 18.

PMID:
16026851
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

MEG reveals different contributions of somatomotor cortex and cerebellum to simple reaction time after temporally structured cues.

Martin T, Houck JM, Bish JP, Kicić D, Woodruff CC, Moses SN, Lee DC, Tesche CD.

Hum Brain Mapp. 2006 Jul;27(7):552-61.

PMID:
16247784
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Neural response correlates of detection of monaurally and binaurally created pitches in humans.

Chait M, Poeppel D, Simon JZ.

Cereb Cortex. 2006 Jun;16(6):835-48. Epub 2005 Sep 8.

PMID:
16151180
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
9.

Influence of evoked response latency and amplitude on stimulus artifact removal.

Oyama AM, Itiki C.

Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2010;2010:6091-4. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5627635.

PMID:
21097131
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Mismatch responses to randomized gradient switching noise as reflected by fMRI and whole-head magnetoencephalography.

Mathiak K, Rapp A, Kircher TT, Grodd W, Hertrich I, Weiskopf N, Lutzenberger W, Ackermann H.

Hum Brain Mapp. 2002 Jul;16(3):190-5.

PMID:
12112773
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Parametric merging of MEG and fMRI reveals spatiotemporal differences in cortical processing of spoken words and environmental sounds in background noise.

Renvall H, Formisano E, Parviainen T, Bonte M, Vihla M, Salmelin R.

Cereb Cortex. 2012 Jan;22(1):132-43. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhr095. Epub 2011 May 25.

PMID:
21613467
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
12.

Direct contrasts between experimental conditions may yield more focal oscillatory activations than comparing pre- versus post-stimulus responses.

Kaiser J, Rahm B, Lutzenberger W.

Brain Res. 2008 Oct 15;1235:63-73. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.06.031. Epub 2008 Jun 19.

PMID:
18602906
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

A graphical model for estimating stimulus-evoked brain responses from magnetoencephalography data with large background brain activity.

Nagarajan SS, Attias HT, Hild KE 2nd, Sekihara K.

Neuroimage. 2006 Apr 1;30(2):400-16. Epub 2005 Dec 19.

PMID:
16360320
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
14.

The M100 component of evoked magnetic fields differs by scaling factors: implications for signal averaging.

Zacharias N, Sielużycki C, Kordecki W, König R, Heil P.

Psychophysiology. 2011 Aug;48(8):1069-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01183.x. Epub 2011 Feb 22.

PMID:
21342204
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

Somatosensory evoked magnetic fields: relation to pre-stimulus mu rhythm.

Nikouline VV, Wikström H, Linkenkaer-Hansen K, Kesäniemi M, Ilmoniemi RJ, Huttunen J.

Clin Neurophysiol. 2000 Jul;111(7):1227-33.

PMID:
10880798
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Line-source modeling and estimation with magnetoencephalography.

Yetik IS, Nehorai A, Muravchik CH, Haueisen J.

IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2005 May;52(5):839-51.

PMID:
15887533
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

MEG in the macaque monkey and human: distinguishing cortical fields in space and time.

Zumer JM, Nagarajan SS, Krubitzer LA, Zhu Z, Turner RS, Disbrow EA.

Brain Res. 2010 Jul 23;1345:110-24. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.05.037. Epub 2010 May 20.

PMID:
20493828
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
18.

The analysis of simple and complex auditory signals in human auditory cortex: magnetoencephalographic evidence from M100 modulation.

Jenkins J 3rd, Idsardi WJ, Poeppel D.

Ear Hear. 2010 Aug;31(4):515-26. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181d99a75.

PMID:
20445455
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

Localization of human supratemporal auditory areas from intracerebral auditory evoked potentials using distributed source models.

Yvert B, Fischer C, Bertrand O, Pernier J.

Neuroimage. 2005 Oct 15;28(1):140-53. Epub 2005 Jul 21.

PMID:
16039144
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Spatiotemporal mapping of cortical activity accompanying voluntary movements using an event-related beamforming approach.

Cheyne D, Bakhtazad L, Gaetz W.

Hum Brain Mapp. 2006 Mar;27(3):213-29.

PMID:
16037985
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk