Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 119

Related Citations for PubMed (Select 20723619)

1.

Accelerometer use in a physical activity intervention trial.

Napolitano MA, Borradaile KE, Lewis BA, Whiteley JA, Longval JL, Parisi AF, Albrecht AE, Sciamanna CN, Jakicic JM, Papandonatos GD, Marcus BH.

Contemp Clin Trials. 2010 Nov;31(6):514-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2010.08.004. Epub 2010 Aug 17.

2.

How many days of monitoring predict physical activity and sedentary behaviour in older adults?

Hart TL, Swartz AM, Cashin SE, Strath SJ.

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 Jun 16;8:62. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-62.

3.

Feasibility and validity of accelerometer measurements to assess physical activity in toddlers.

Van Cauwenberghe E, Gubbels J, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Cardon G.

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 Jun 26;8:67. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-67.

4.

Discrepancies between methods of identifying objectively determined physical activity.

Ham SA, Reis JP, Strath SJ, Dubose KD, Ainsworth BE.

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Jan;39(1):52-8.

PMID:
17218884
5.

Comparison of 3 accelerometer data reduction approaches, step counts, and 2 self-report measures for estimating physical activity in free-living adults.

Umstattd Meyer MR, Baller SL, Mitchell SM, Trost SG.

J Phys Act Health. 2013 Sep;10(7):1068-74. Epub 2012 Nov 5.

PMID:
23134811
6.
7.

Actigraph accelerometer interinstrument reliability during free-living in adults.

McClain JJ, Sisson SB, Tudor-Locke C.

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Sep;39(9):1509-14.

PMID:
17805082
8.

Accelerometer-determined physical activity in adults and older people.

Hansen BH, Kolle E, Dyrstad SM, Holme I, Anderssen SA.

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012 Feb;44(2):266-72. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31822cb354.

PMID:
21796052
9.

Comparison of self-reported versus accelerometer-measured physical activity.

Dyrstad SM, Hansen BH, Holme IM, Anderssen SA.

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014 Jan;46(1):99-106. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182a0595f.

PMID:
23793232
10.

Study protocol of physical activity and sedentary behaviour measurement among schoolchildren by accelerometry--cross-sectional survey as part of the ENERGY-project.

Yıldırım M, Verloigne M, de Bourdeaudhuij I, Androutsos O, Manios Y, Felso R, Kovács É, Doessegger A, Bringolf-Isler B, te Velde SJ, Brug J, Chinapaw MJ.

BMC Public Health. 2011 Mar 25;11:182. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-182.

11.

Comparison of the IPAQ-A and actigraph in relation to VO2max among European adolescents: the HELENA study.

Ottevaere C, Huybrechts I, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Sjöström M, Ruiz JR, Ortega FB, Hagströmer M, Widhalm K, Molnár D, Moreno LA, Beghin L, Kafatos A, Polito A, Manios Y, Mártinez-Gómez D, De Henauw S.

J Sci Med Sport. 2011 Jul;14(4):317-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2011.02.008. Epub 2011 Mar 27.

PMID:
21444243
12.

Mechanical and free living comparisons of four generations of the Actigraph activity monitor.

Ried-Larsen M, Brønd JC, Brage S, Hansen BH, Grydeland M, Andersen LB, Møller NC.

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 Sep 12;9:113. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-113.

13.

Randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention by primary care nurses to increase walking in patients aged 60-74 years: protocol of the PACE-Lift (Pedometer Accelerometer Consultation Evaluation - Lift) trial.

Harris T, Kerry S, Victor C, Ekelund U, Woodcock A, Iliffe S, Whincup P, Beighton C, Ussher M, David L, Brewin D, Adams F, Rogers A, Cook D.

BMC Public Health. 2013 Jan 4;13:5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-5.

14.

Comparison of two ActiGraph accelerometer generations in the assessment of physical activity in free living conditions.

Vanhelst J, Mikulovic J, Bui-Xuan G, Dieu O, Blondeau T, Fardy P, Béghin L.

BMC Res Notes. 2012 Apr 25;5:187. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-187.

15.

Validity of physical activity intensity predictions by ActiGraph, Actical, and RT3 accelerometers.

Rothney MP, Schaefer EV, Neumann MM, Choi L, Chen KY.

Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008 Aug;16(8):1946-52. doi: 10.1038/oby.2008.279. Epub 2008 May 29.

16.

The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of exercise referral schemes: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Pavey TG, Anokye N, Taylor AH, Trueman P, Moxham T, Fox KR, Hillsdon M, Green C, Campbell JL, Foster C, Mutrie N, Searle J, Taylor RS.

Health Technol Assess. 2011 Dec;15(44):i-xii, 1-254. doi: 10.3310/hta15440. Review.

17.

Everything you wanted to know about selecting the "right" Actigraph accelerometer cut-points for youth, but…: a systematic review.

Kim Y, Beets MW, Welk GJ.

J Sci Med Sport. 2012 Jul;15(4):311-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2011.12.001. Epub 2012 Feb 4. Review.

PMID:
22306372
18.

Reliability and validity of YRBS physical activity items among middle school students.

Troped PJ, Wiecha JL, Fragala MS, Matthews CE, Finkelstein DM, Kim J, Peterson KE.

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Mar;39(3):416-25.

PMID:
17473767
19.

Preliminary evidence of physical activity levels measured by accelerometer in Spanish adolescents: the AFINOS Study.

Martínez-Gómez D, Welk GJ, Calle ME, Marcos A, Veiga OL; AFINOS Study Group.

Nutr Hosp. 2009 Mar-Apr;24(2):226-32.

20.

Physical activity patterns assessed by accelerometry in older people.

Davis MG, Fox KR.

Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007 Jul;100(5):581-9. Epub 2006 Oct 25.

PMID:
17063361
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk